Longitudinal Resilience and Risk Factors in Pediatric Postoperative Pain (LORRIS): Protocol for a Prospective Longitudinal Swiss University Children's Hospitals-Based Study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is defined as pain that persists after a surgical procedure and has a significant impact on quality of life. Previous studies show the importance of psychological factors in CPSP, yet the majority of studies focused solely on negative emotions. This longitudinal observational study aims to broaden this knowledge base by examining the role of emotional state, emotion variability, emotion regulation and emotion differentiation on the child and the parent level for the development CPSP, and to describe pain and emotion-related trajectories following surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We intend to include 280 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years with a planned orthopaedic surgery and their parents. A total of five assessment time points is planned: 3 weeks before surgery (baseline), 2 weeks after surgery (post) and 3 months (follow-up (FU) 1), 6 months and 12 months after surgery. At baseline and post only, children and parents are asked to complete a daily diary thrice a day for a week where they rate their current emotional state and their pain severity (children only). Emotional state ratings will be used to calculate indices of emotion variability, emotion regulation and emotion differentiation. Children and parents will complete questionnaires at each time point, including measures on quality of life, social support, sleep, and symptoms of anxiety and depression.To predict development of CPSP, generalised linear regression models will be used, resulting in ORs and 95% CIs. Pearson product-moment correlations between predictors and outcomes will be evaluated at each time point. The primary outcome of the prediction model is CPSP at FU1. For the trajectory analysis, the classification method K-means for longitudinal data will be used to determine clusters in the data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Ethics Committee of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, has approved the study (ID: 2023-01475). Participants will be compensated, and a dissemination workshop will be held. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05816174.

3D planning and patient specific instrumentation for intraarticular corrective osteotomy of trapeziometacarpal-, metacarpal and finger joints.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular malunions of the finger can lead to deformity and loss of function and can be treated with intra-articular corrective osteotomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographic joint congruency, feasibility and functional outcome of three-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) for corrective osteotomies at the trapeziometacarpal and finger joints. METHODS: Computer-tomography (CT) scans were acquired preoperatively for standard 3D planning, which was followed by calculation of cutting planes and the design of individualized bone surface contact drilling, sawing and reposition guides. Follow-up CT scans and clinical examinations (range of motion, grip strength) were performed. Postoperative complications were documented and patient-reported outcome measurements were assessed (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ)). RESULTS: Ten patients (mean age 28.4 ± 12.8,range 13.8-51.3) years) were included with a mean follow-up of 21 ± 18 (3-59) months including seven osteotomies at the trapeziometacarpal or metacarpophalangeal joints and three at the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP). All radiographic follow-up examinations showed the planned correction with good joint congruency and regular osseous consolidation. At the latest follow-up, the range of motion (ROM) increased and the average grip strength recovered to the level of the contralateral side. No postoperative complication was detected. The mean SANE score improved from 44 ± 23 (0-70) to 82 ± 12 (60-90) after a mean of 72 ± 20 (44-114) months. The mean postoperative brief MHQ was 92 ± 8 (71-98). CONCLUSION: The use of 3D PSI in treating intra-articular malunions at the trapeziometacarpal and finger joints restored articular congruency accurately. ROM and grip strength improved postoperatively comparable to the healthy contralateral side and patient-reported outcome measures improved after medium-term follow-up.

Longitudinal observational study of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction: results after 15 years.

HYPOTHESIS: This study investigated the hypothesis that functional outcome remains significantly improved over the preoperative state beyond 15 years of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction. METHODS: Operations were performed on 22 shoulders at a mean age of 68 (range, 54-77) years. The patients could personally be reviewed clinically and radiographically in intervals of 2 to 5 years and with a final follow-up examination at no less than 15 years (mean, 16.1; range, 15-19 years). The RTSA was a primary procedure in 7 procedures, and 15 patients had undergone at least 1 previous nonarthroplasty procedure. RESULTS: The mean absolute Constant score (CS) had improved from 23 ± 11 to 58 ± 19 points (P < .001) and the relative CS (rCS) from 30% ± 13% to 73% ± 23% (P < .001) at final follow-up. Significant improvements were seen in mean pain scores (4 to 12 points; P < .001), active anterior elevation (53° to 101°; P = .001), abduction (55° to 86°; P = .005), and Subjective Shoulder Value (27% to 78%; P = .001). The mean rCS and Subjective Shoulder Value did not significantly deteriorate over 15 years, but mean active abduction was significantly reduced over time (P = .018). One or more complications were recorded in 13 patients (59%), with 6 failed RTSAs (27%).The mean rCS of patients with complications (explantations excluded) was not significantly inferior compared with that of patients without complications (62% vs. 81%; P = .090). CONCLUSIONS: This early series of RTSA shows a substantial complication and failure rate. If, however, complications can be treated without removal of the implants, outcome is not compromised. Overall shoulder function and subjective outcome remained significantly improved and highly satisfactory during the entire study period.