Treatment characteristics, efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin analogues in routine management of primary immune thrombocytopenia.

: Thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RAs) have demonstrated good efficacy and tolerance in clinical trials in refractory chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) or chronic ITP with contraindication for splenectomy. No head-to-head study is available, and differences in trials design do not allow comparisons. Information on the use of TPO-RAs in nonchronic ITP is scant. We described our experience with TPO-RAs in ITP (chronic, persistent and newly diagnosed ITP) in routine clinical practice. Retrospective series of 100 adult ITP patients was analysed; 41 treated with eltrombopag, 37 with romiplostim and 22 with both. Response-related and safety variables were evaluated. With a median follow-up of 86.5 weeks (interquartile range, 34.3-128 weeks), no differences were found in response rate, time to response, stability of response or response duration based on the type of TPO-RA used. Of all, 25% of patients with newly diagnosed or persistent ITP and 7.2% with chronic responded and maintained their response when TPO-RAs were stopped. Regarding safety, two developed bone marrow fibrosis grade 3, with loss of response to both drugs. Incidence of vascular events was 7%. Both TPO-RAs may be useful in all types of ITP, not only chronic but also persistent and newly diagnosed. Similar results were noted in efficacy and safety variables for both drugs.

Preanalytical errors: a preliminary approach to the point of view of primary health care givers.

BACKGROUND: The presence of errors in the preanalytical phase is a widely studied topic. However, information regarding the perspective of those professionals involved is rather scant. METHODS: Two focus groups of professionals from Primary Care involved in the preanalytical phase (general practitioners [GP], community nurses [CN], and other auxiliary health workers, including administrative personnel [AHW]) were convened. A qualitative analysis with a phenomenological approach was performed by using the structure of SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis as a guide, and results were categorized by grouping the resultant dimensions according to this structure. RESULTS: Overall, 12 professionals (3 GP, 6 CN, and 3 AHW) were distributed in two groups. Age and gender distribution were similar between groups. The most commented strengths were organizational capability and teamwork. The main weakness was the workload increase (compared to the short time spent on sample collection). Opportunities were related to workload optimization through on-line analytical requests. Threats were related to the long time elapsed between sample drawing at Primary Care and delivery to the Central Laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: The phenomenological approach allows revealing those aspects that cannot be entirely elucidated by objective data measurement. Attitudes considered as positive can be exploited by the institution, whereas those considered as negative alert us to possible future problems. Primary Care professionals offered a different point of view to laboratory staff, but both recognized high workload as the main threat and on-line analytical request as the best opportunity. These perspectives may help to improve detection and decrease the number of errors.