Modified sympathicotomy in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and structural heart disease: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Modified cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) with stellate ganglion (SG) sparing is a novel technique for cardiac neuromodulation in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to describe the mid- to long-term clinical outcome of the modified CSD with SG sparing in a series of patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and refractory VT. METHODS: All consecutive patients with SHD and refractory VT undergoing modified CSD were enrolled. Baseline clinical characteristics and periprocedural data were collected for all patients. The primary outcome was any recurrence of sustained VT. RESULTS: We enrolled 15 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.9 years; male 100%) undergoing modified CSD. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 37 ± 11% and all patients had an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD); the underlying cardiomyopathy was non-ischemic in 73.3% of them. At least one previous ablation had been attempted in 66.6% of cases. The 73.3% of patients underwent bilateral CSD and the mean effective surgical time was 10.8 ± 2.4 min per side; no major periprocedural complication occurred. After a median follow-up time of 15 months (IQR: 8.5-24.5 months), the primary outcome occurred in 47.6% of cases. All patients experienced a reduction of ICD shocks after CSD (3.1 ICD shocks/patient before vs. 0.3 ICD shocks/patient after CSD; p-value: 0.001). Bilateral CSD and a VT cycle length < 340 ms were associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A modified CSD approach with stellate ganglion sparing appears to be safe, fast, and effective in the treatment of patients with SHD and refractory VTs.

Ventricular Electrograms Duration Map to Detect Ventricular Arrhythmia Substrate: the VEDUM Project Study.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of the wave-front activation patterns is crucial for the comprehension and treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). The ventricular electrograms duration map (VEDUM) is a potential method to identify areas (VEDUM area) with slow and inhomogeneous activation. There is no available data on the characteristics and the arrhythmogenic role of VEDUM areas identified during sinus/paced rhythm. METHODS: Patients referred for VT ablation were enrolled at 3 different centers. VEDUM maps during sinus/paced rhythm as well as substrate and functional maps were created; activation mapping was performed for all hemodynamically tolerated VT. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (mean age:70.1±9.4 years; males 93.8%) were enrolled. The VEDUM approach was achieved in all patients and the mean size of the VEDUM area was 12.1±6.9 cm2 (interquartile range, 7.8-14.9 cm2). A significative difference was observed between the electrogram duration in the VEDUM area and the normal tissue (163.7 ms [interquartile range, 142.3-199.2 ms]; versus 65.5 ms [interquartile range, 59.5-76.2 ms]; P<0.001). The VEDUM area was visualized in a dense scar (<0.5 mV) in 19 (59.4%) patients. A deceleration zone and late potentials were recorded inside the VEDUM area in 56.3% and 81.3%, respectively. When a complete VT activation mapping was available, the isthmus projected in the VEDUM area in 93.5% of patients; 8 of them had multiple VTs mapped and in the 87.5% all VT isthmuses were included in the VEDUM area. CONCLUSIONS: VEDUM maps allow the identification of discrete areas of inhomogeneous and slow conduction. They represent a potential target for VT ablation, including patients with multiple morphologies.

Cardiac sympathetic denervation for untreatable ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease. Strengths and pitfalls of evolving surgical techniques.

Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) is a valuable option in the setting of refractory ventricular arrhythmias in patient with structural heart disease. Since the procedure was introduced for non structural heart disease patients the techniques evolved and were modified to be adopted in several settings. In this state-of-the-art article we revised different techniques, their rationale, strengths, and pitfalls.

Acute atrial ischemia associates with early but not late new-onset atrial fibrillation in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI: relationship with in-hospital outcomes.

BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF), both early (EAF) or late (LAF), may complicate ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The mechanisms underlying EAF or LAF are poorly described. We investigated atrial branch occlusion and EAF or LAF onset in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including 155 STEMI patients. Patients were divided into 3 groups: sinus rhythm (SR), EAF, or LAF. Clinical characteristics, angiographic features including occlusion of atrial branches, namely ramus ostia cavae superioris (ROCS), atrio-ventricular node artery (AVNA), right intermediate atrial artery (RIAA), and left intermediate atrial artery, were assessed. We also investigated in-hospital adverse events (AEs) and death. RESULTS: Mean age was 63.8±11.9 years; 78.7% were men. NOAF was detected in 22 (14.2%) patients: 10 (6.4%) EAF and 12 LAF (7.7%). Compared to EAF, LAF patients were older (p=0.013), with higher GRACE risk score (p=0.014) and Killip class (p=0.015), depressed ejection fraction (p=0.007), elevated filling pressures (p=0.029), higher C-reactive protein (p=0.014) and more with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow <3 (p=0.015). Compared to SR, EAF was associated with higher prevalence of occluded ROCS (p=0.010), AVNA (p=0.005), and RIAA (p<0.001). Moreover, EAF patients had more frequently ≥2 diseased atrial branches than SR (19.5%, p<0.001) and LAF (25%, p<0.030) patients. LAF patients had a higher in-hospital AEs (p=0.019 vs SR; p=0.029 vs EAF) and death (p=0.004 vs SR). CONCLUSIONS: The occlusion of atrial branches is associated with EAF but not LAF following STEMI. LAF patients had worse in-hospital AEs and mortality.