RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tissue diagnosis is mandatory prior to treatment of an abdominal or pelvic lesion in a child. OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic yield and complications of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and 1.2-mm needle core biopsy (NCB) for abdominal and pelvic lesions in children using US guidance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety consecutive abdominal or pelvic US-guided biopsies in 61 children; 53 FNAB procedures in 43 children and 37 NCB procedures in 34 children were retrospectively analysed. Fifty-seven biopsies were performed on malignant lesions and 33 on benign lesions. In 15 children, both FNAB and NCB were performed at the same occasion. RESULTS: FNAB was diagnostic in 41 (77 %) of 53 biopsies while NCB provided a correct diagnosis in 35 (95 %) of 37 biopsies. Results were similar in both malignant and benign conditions. Clinically important bleeding complicated three biopsies (3.3 %); in two after FNAB and in one after combined FNAB and NCB. CONCLUSION: If FNAB were to be replaced with 1.2-mm NCB using an automatic gun, the diagnostic yield for abdominal and pelvic focal lesions in children would improve significantly (P < 0.05) while the complication rate would remain low. NCB may reduce the need for diagnostic and staging surgery and repeated procedures.
