Comparative effects of chronic ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blocked losartan on cardiac hypertrophy and renal function in hypertensive patients.

The present study describes the effects of losartan and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril on blood pressure, echocardiographically calculated left ventricular mass, renal function evaluated by glomerular filtration rate and quality of life. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is of importance for cardiovascular growth. There is substantial experimental documentation in animals that the angiotensin II antagonist, losartan, decreases the cardiac hypertrophy response caused by elevated arterial pressure as well as intravascular volume overload. However, data in humans is scarce. This is a 3-year, randomised, double-blind study with parallel group design in 50 patients with essential hypertension. The results show that both drugs reduced blood pressure equally effectively, and also left ventricular mass (P < 0.001). After 3 years of treatment glomerular filtration rate significantly increased with losartan (P < 0.005). Serum uric acid fell modestly although significantly, dose-dependent in losartan patients compared with an increase in enalapril patients. A fall in serum potassium from the pre-study period was observed in all patients. There was no difference between treatments in terms of patient satisfaction on quality of life. Both drugs have relatively similar hormonal and haemodynamic effect, with an excellent tolerability profile; they appear to induce comparable blood pressure falls in hypertensive patients in particular, therapy based on specific Ang II blockade may offer advantages in high risk hypertensives if left ventricular hypertrophy is present. Both enalapril and losartan, in improving the renal function attenuating the intrarenal effects of angiotensin II, might be able to reverse the pathophysiology of essential hypertensive kidney disease, and should be first-choice drugs in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Irbesartan effects on renal function in patients with renal impairment and hypertension: a drug-withdrawal study.

The blood-pressure lowering activity, tolerability, and safety of irbesartan was evaluated in 52 hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency. After a 3-week placebo period, once-daily irbesartan was administered for 12 weeks at a daily dose of 150 mg titrated to 300 mg. A second, non-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, antihypertensive drug was added after 8 weeks as needed. Twenty-four-hour creatinine clearance was determined and renal clearance studies of inulin and para-aminohippurate were done in a subset of 11 patients. Trough sitting blood pressures were reduced at the end of the first week in all groups. At weeks 4, 8, and 12 the reductions in systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure averaged -11.9/-8.7, -10.8/-9.4, and -14.7/-12.1 mm Hg in patients with mild renal insufficiency and -7.7/-6.3, -13.1/-11.8, and -14.1/-10.6 mm Hg in patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency. Creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, and effective renal plasma flow were stable. Irbesartan was withdrawn in only five patients because of adverse clinical or laboratory experience. Hyperkalemia (>6 mEq/l) requiring discontinuation of irbesartan occurred in only one patient. Once-daily irbesartan given as monotherapy at dose of 150-300 mg or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs is effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with chronic renal disease. Irbesartan regimens are well tolerated in all groups. In addition, the blood pressure-lowering effect of irbesartan is accompanied by a significant reduction in proteinuria in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Effects of enalapril and isradipine alone and in combination on blood pressure, renal function and echocardiographic parameters in mild hypertension.

AIMS AND METHODS: A study was carried out to evaluate the influence of antihypertensive treatment with combined low doses of enalapril plus isradipine (5+5 mg daily) compared with those of either drug at a higher dose level (10 mg daily) by double-blind, three-way crossover study (balanced Latin square design) in 102 subjects (mean age 51.9 +/- 7.42 years) with essential hypertension. Left ventricular mass and function were evaluated by M-B mode echocardiography, renal function by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and by serum and 24-h urinary Na+ and K+ during wash-out period and after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The supine blood pressure for subjects given placebo was 171/103 mmHg. After 24 weeks of treatment, systolic and diastolic supine blood pressure were significantly lower with 5 mg isradipine plus 5 mg enalapril (134/84 mmHg) than with 10 mg enalapril (137/84 mmHg) or with 10 mg isradipine (144/85 mmHg). Left ventricular posterior wall and septal thickness were significantly and similarly reduced in all groups. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic end diameters were not significantly changed. Left ventricular mass (LVM) was significantly reduced in E plus I group and enalapril group. GFR was not significantly altered. The 24-h urinary Na+ significantly increased with enalapril, more so than isradipine. The combination was tolerated better than either monotherapy. We observed no clinically significant changes in laboratory variables including blood lipoproteins. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of isradipine plus enalapril reduced blood pressure more effectively and was better tolerated than other drug alone. All three groups showed similar changes in echocardiographic indices and no change in renal function.