The Effect of Thyrotropin Suppression on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Long-term management of intermediate- and high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) involves thyrotropin (TSH) suppression with thyroid hormone to prevent potential stimulation of TSH receptors on DTC cells, leading to tumor growth. However, the current guidelines recommending TSH suppression are based on low- to moderate-quality evidence. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the role of TSH suppression in intermediate- and high-risk DTC patients (≥18 years) treated as per regional guideline-based therapy with a follow-up duration of 5 years (PROSPERO #252396). TSH suppression was defined as "below normal reference range" or, when known, <0.5 mIU/L. Primary outcome measures included (i) composite of progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse-free survival (RLFS), and (ii) composite of disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcome included a composite of cardiac or skeletal adverse events. All outcomes and comparisons were represented as TSH suppression versus TSH nonsuppression. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies were included for analysis. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using random-effects model. Results: Abstract screening was performed on 6,369 studies. After the exclusion of irrelevant studies and full-text screening, nine studies were selected for the final meta-analysis. Based on seven studies (3,591 patients), the composite outcome of PFS, DFS, and RLFS was not significantly different between TSH suppression and nonsuppression groups (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.48-1.17; I2 = 76%). Similarly, a DSS and OS composite outcome assessment based on four studies (3,616 patients) did not favor TSH suppression (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.31-1.52; I2 = 88%). Even after excluding studies of lower quality, the primary outcomes were not significantly different between the TSH suppression and nonsuppression cohorts. The secondary outcome, obtained from two studies (1,294 patients), was significantly higher in the TSH-suppressed groups (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.30-2.55; I2 = 0%). Significant study heterogeneity was noted for primary outcomes. Conclusion: TSH suppression in intermediate- and high-risk DTC may not improve survival outcomes but may increase the risk of secondary complications. However, the limited evidence and study heterogeneity warrant cautious interpretation of our findings. Registration: PROSPERO #252396.

The "Partial Innocence" Effect: False Guilty Pleas to Partially Unethical Behaviors.

Although research has focused on the "innocence problem," "partial innocence" may also plague individuals who plead guilty to crimes they did not commit, but that are either comparable, more severe, or less severe than their actual crimes. Using a high-stake experimental paradigm and an immersive role-playing paradigm, we examined the psychology of partial innocence. Students were randomly induced (or imagined themselves) to be innocent, guilty, or partially innocent of committing an academic transgression and then given the choice to accept or reject a deal to avoid disciplinary sanction. Across three studies (Ns = 88, 75, 746), partially innocent students pled to cheating nearly as often as guilty students and vastly more often than innocent students. Partially innocent students-not unlike guilty students-experienced greater feelings of guilt than did innocent students. In turn, these feelings of guilt, but not shame, were associated with taking responsibility for a range of transgressions not committed.

Advice and perspectives from navigating the couples match in otolaryngology: A qualitative pilot study.

Introduction: There is a lack of qualitative analysis of the personal experiences within Couples Matching. In this qualitative study, we aim to record personal attitudes, reflections, and advice on experiences with the Couples Match process. Methods: Our survey, consisting of two open-ended questions regarding the experience of Couples Matching, was distributed from January 2022 to March 2022 via email to 106 otolaryngology program directors across the nation. Survey responses were analyzed iteratively using the constructivist grounded theory to construct themes related to pre-match priorities, match-related stressors, and post-match satisfaction. Themes were developed inductively and refined iteratively as the dataset evolved. Results: 18 Couples Match residents responded. In response to the first question: "What was the most difficult part of the process for you and/or your partner?", we identified the following themes: cost and financial burden, increased stress on the relationship, sacrificing top choices, and finalizing the match list. In response to the second question: "Using your experience as a previous applicant, what advice would you give to another couple planning on couples matching?", we identified four common themes: compromise, advocacy, dynamic conversations, and applying broadly. Conclusion: We sought to understand the Couples Match process through the perspective of previous applicants. Analyzing the views and attitudes of Couples Match applicants, our study captures the most challenging aspects of the experience and highlights possible areas to improve advising for couples, including important factors to consider when applying, ranking, and interviewing.

Symptom profiles and illness course among Anabaptist and Non-Anabaptist adults with major mood disorders.

BACKGROUND: Anabaptists comprise large and growing Amish and Mennonite populations with a unique genetic heritage and cultural background. Little is known about the symptoms and course of major mood disorders in Anabaptists. Even less is known about the impact of potential moderators on symptom severity and course. METHODS: A sample of Amish and Mennonite participants with bipolar, recurrent unipolar, or schizoaffective bipolar disorder (n = 155) were systematically evaluated with a well-validated instrument. Cases were compared with non-Anabaptist participants (n = 155) matched for age, sex, and psychiatric diagnosis and evaluated by the same methods. RESULTS: Despite substantial cultural differences, the profile of manic and depressive symptoms during illness episodes did not significantly differ between the two groups. Alcohol use disorder (AUD) was significantly less frequent among Anabaptists, and was associated with more major depressive episodes and more hospitalizations for major depression in Anabaptist, but not non-Anabaptist participants. Lifetime history of head injury showed a trend toward association with more episodes of major depression in both Anabaptist and non-Anabaptist groups that did not withstand multiple test correction. CONCLUSIONS: The presentation of a highly heritable psychiatric illness such as bipolar disorder does not differ in cases drawn from genetically unique Anabaptist populations. However, alcohol comorbidity, head injury, and their effects on illness course suggest some differences that deserve further investigation.

Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Neurocognitive deficits are present in bipolar disorder (BD) patients and their unaffected (nonbipolar) relatives, but it is not clear which domains are most often impaired and the extent of the impairment resulting from shared genetic factors. In this literature review, we address these issues and identify specific neurocognitive tasks most sensitive to cognitive deficits in patients and unaffected relatives. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline and PsycINFO databases. RESULTS: Fifty-one articles assessing cognitive functioning in BD patients (23 studies) and unaffected relatives (28 studies) were examined. Patients and, less so, relatives show impairments in attention, processing speed, verbal learning/memory, and verbal fluency. CONCLUSION: Studies were more likely to find impairment in patients than relatives, suggesting that some neurocognitive deficits may be a result of the illness itself and/or its treatment. However, small sample sizes, differences among relatives studied (e.g., relatedness, diagnostic status, age), and differences in assessment instruments may contribute to inconsistencies in reported neurocognitive performance among relatives. Additional studies addressing these issues are needed.