Moving Toward Online-Based Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing and Treatment Services for Young People: Who Will Use It and What Do They Want?

BACKGROUND: The market for online sexually transmitted infection (STI) services is rapidly expanding. Online health services often have unequal uptake among different demographics of the population. There is a need to understand how different online delivery options for STI testing may appeal to different groups of young people, particularly young people who have higher rates of STI diagnoses. METHODS: An online survey of young Australians aged 16 to 29 years was conducted to understand service preferences regarding consultation (telehealth, fully automated questionnaire), testing (electronic pathology form, at-home self-sampling), and treatment (e-prescriptions, mailed oral tablets). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression examined associations between user characteristics and service preferences, and adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. RESULTS: Among 905 respondents, rural youth were more likely to prefer fully automated questionnaires (aRRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.5) over telehealth consultations, whereas culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) youth were less likely (aRRR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7). Rural youth preferred at-home self-sampling kits (aRRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7) over electronic forms for on-site collection at pathology centers, with the opposite for CALD youth (aRRR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.0). Receiving oral antibiotics by mail was preferred by rural youth (aRRR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6) over for in-clinic treatment, but not for CALD youth (aRRR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that rural youth tend to prefer self-navigated and automated options, whereas CALD prefer options with greater provider engagement. Online STI service providers should consider how different service options may affect equitable uptake across the population and implications for addressing disparities in testing and treatment.

Web-Based STI/HIV Testing Services Available for Access in Australia: Systematic Search and Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates continue to rise in Australia, and timely access to testing and treatment is crucial to reduce transmission. Web-based services have been viewed as a way to improve timely access to STI/HIV testing and have proliferated in recent years. However, the regulation of these services in Australia is minimal, leading to concerns about their quality. The purpose of this review was to systematically identify web-based STI/HIV testing services available in Australia and assess them on aspects of quality, reliability, and accessibility. OBJECTIVE: We aim to systematically identify and assess web-based STI/HIV testing services available in Australia. METHODS: A Google search of Australian web-based services was conducted in March 2022 and repeated in September 2022 using Boolean operators and search terms related to test services (eg, on the internet or home), STIs (eg, chlamydia or gonorrhea), and test type (eg, self-test). The first 10 pages were assessed, and services were categorized as self-testing (ST; test at home), self-sampling (SS; sample at home and return to laboratory), or self-navigated pathology (SNP; specimens collected at pathology center). Website reliability was assessed against the Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct, and service quality was assessed using a scorecard that was developed based on similar reviews, Australian guidelines for in-person services, and UK standards. Additionally, we looked at measures of accessibility including cost, rural access, and time to test results. RESULTS: Seventeen services were identified (8 ST, 2 SS, and 7 SNP). Only 4 services offered recommended testing for all 4 infections (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV) including genital, anorectal, and oropharyngeal sites, and 5 offered tests other than those recommended by Australian testing guidelines (eg, Ureaplasma). Nine services (1 SNP, 8 self-test) had no minimum age requirements for access. Reliability scores (scale 0-8) were similar between all services (range 4.75-8.0). Quality weighted scores (scale 0-58) were similar between SNP and SS services (average 44.89, SD 5.56 and 44.75, SD 1.77, respectively) but lower for ST services (22.66, SD 8.93; P=.002). Government-funded services were of higher quality than private services (43.54, SD 6.71 vs 29.43, SD 13.55; P=.03). The cost for services varied between SNP (Aus $0-$595; ie, US $0-$381.96), self-sample (Aus $0; ie, US $0), and ST (Aus $0-$135; ie, US $0-$86.66). The time to test results was much shorter for SNP services (~4 days) than for SS (~12 days) and ST (~14 days). CONCLUSIONS: This review identified considerable variability in the quality and reliability of the web-based STI/HIV testing services in Australia. Given the proliferation and use of these services will likely increase, it is imperative that Australia develops national standards to ensure the standard-of-care offered by web-based STI/HIV testing services is appropriate to protect Australian users from the impact of poorly performing and inappropriate tests.

High burden of sexually transmitted infections among under-resourced populations in the Dominican Republic.

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a major health issue, exacerbated by limited financial and infrastructural resources in developing countries. Methods: Prevalence of STIs was assessed in two urban centers of the Dominican Republic (DR) among populations at high risk for STIs: pregnant youth, men who have sex with men (MSM), trans women (TG), batey residents, female sex workers, and people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We conducted a cross-sectional survey and biological specimen collection to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhea, Mycoplasma genitalium, Trichomonas vaginalis (trichomoniasis), Treponema pallidum (syphilis), HIV, hepatitis B and C, and human papillomavirus (HPV) among at-risk populations between 2015 and 2018. Ureaplasma urealyticum testing was also conducted even though it is not considered a STI. A non-probability community sample was recruited. Descriptive statistics examined the prevalence of STIs by population. Results: A total of 1991 subjects participated in the study. The median age was 26 years (range: 18-65). Most participants were female (65.3%), heterosexual (76.7%), and were not partnered (55.7%). Most of the participants reported unprotected vaginal sex in the last 6 months (54%); among MSM and TG almost half of the participants reported unprotected anal sex in the last 6 months and 17.6% reported drug use in the last 6 months. Almost half of the participants (49%) tested positive for one or more STIs. The most prevalent STI was Chlamydia trachomatis (12.8%), and human papillomavirus (11.9%). Among transgender women, 65.3% tested positive for an STI, 64.8% of female sex workers tested positive for an STI, and 53.8% of pregnant adolescents tested positive for an STI. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of STIs among key and under resourced populations in the DR. Our findings highlight the need to conduct further research to optimize prevention and care strategies for structurally vulnerable and under resourced populations in the DR.