RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary, patient-centred approach aimed at expediting recovery, improving clinical outcomes, and reducing healthcare costs. Initially developed for colorectal surgery, ERAS principles have been successfully applied across various surgical specialties, including cardiac surgery. This study outlines the implementation and certification process of the ERAS program in a tertiary cardiac surgical centre within the Heart-Vessel Department at Lausanne University Hospital. METHODS: The implementation involved forming a multidisciplinary team, including cardiac surgeons, anaesthesiologists, intensivists, a cardiologist, clinical nurse specialists and physiotherapists. The ERAS nurse coordinator played a central role in organizing meetings, promoting the program, developing protocols, and collecting data. The certification process required adherence to ERAS guidelines, structured training and external evaluation. Key phases included pre-ERAS data collection, protocol dissemination, inclusion of the 1st patients, followed by analysis and full implementation. RESULTS: Achieving certification required maintaining a compliance rate of over 70% with established protocols. The process involved overcoming various barriers, such as inconsistent practices and the need for multidisciplinary collaboration. In this paper, we provide some solutions to these challenges, including team education, regular meetings and continuous feedback loops. Preliminary data from the initial cohort showed improvements in early mobilization, opioid use, respiratory complications and shorter hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: The successful implementation of the ERAS program at our institution demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of a structured, multidisciplinary approach in cardiac surgery. Continuous self-assessment and adherence to guidelines are essential for sustained improvement in patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) has been described in intensive care (ICU) survivors, being present in 50% of patients surviving 12 months, with well-defined risk factors. Severely burned patients combine many of these risk factors, but the prevalence of PICS has not yet been documented in burns. The study aimed to answer this question and identify associations of PICS with clinical characteristics. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study of major burn survivors admitted to the burn ICU between 2013 and 2019. Main inclusion criteria: major burns>20 %BSA and ICU admission. The PICS components were assessed using three questionnaires: 1) Physical with Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B); 2) Cognitive health with MacNair Cognitive Difficulties Self-Rating Scale (CDS); 3) Mental health with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. PICS was considered present if at least one component out of three was abnormal. Data as mean±SD. RESULTS: Among the 288 patients admitted during the period, 132 met the inclusion criteria: 53 patients were finally enrolled. They were aged 44 ± 18 years at the time of injury and burned 24 ± 20 BSA % and stayed 25 ± 44 days in the ICU. PICS was identified in 35 patients (66 %): more than one component was altered in 21 patients (60 %). Principal risk factors were more than 3 general anesthetics, prolonged mechanical ventilation (>4 days), ICU stay (>8 days), and hospital stay (>25 days) CONCLUSION: PICS occurred in 66 % of major burns with two or three components affected simultaneously in 60 %, i.e. more frequently than in general ICU patients.
