Clinical utility and prognostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in patients with hematologic malignancies.

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to determine the performance characteristics of the galactomannan (GM) assay in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Patients were classified as proven, probable, possible, or no invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), according to international guidelines. A total of 173 BAL samples from 145 patients were included. There were 5 proven, 7 probable, and 35 possible cases of IPA. Using a GM index cutoff of ≥ 0.5, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) of the BAL GM assay were 100%, 78%, 26%, and 100%, respectively. Using a GM index cutoff of ≥ 2.0, the sensitivity and NPV remained 100%, but specificity and PPV increased to 93% and 50%, respectively. The BAL GM assay is a highly sensitive screening test for IPA in patients with hematologic malignancies. Increasing the cutoff value to 2.0 would improve the performance of this assay.

Is severe intestinal chronic graft-versus-host disease an indication for surgery? A report of two cases.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) frequently complicates allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but small bowel involvement with obstruction is rarely observed. We report two patients who underwent allogeneic sibling HSCT and developed severe cGVHD involving the small bowel, causing unremitting obstructive symptoms and malnutrition despite maximal immunosuppression. Both patients underwent ileal resection and stricturoplasties. The first patient promptly improved, and remains asymptomatic 32 months after transplant. Three weeks after the resection of 90 cm of small bowel, the second patient developed leaking stricturoplasty and peritonitis, with a relapse of chronic myelogenous leukemia in accelerated phase. Later, an enterocutaneous fistula required additional small bowel resection and ileostomy. The patient subsequently died from pulmonary infection a few weeks after the last surgical procedure. Similar to inflammatory bowel disease, these two cases highlight that surgery may be a valuable option in patients who present with obstructive severe cGVHD refractory to aggressive immunosuppression.

The hemodynamically unstable patient in the intensive care unit: hemodynamic vs. transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Transesophageal echocardiography is a diagnostic and monitoring modality. The objectives of our study were to compare the diagnoses obtained with continuous transesophageal echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit, to determine interobserver variability of diagnosis obtained with both modalities, and to evaluate its impact. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Consecutive hemodynamically unstable patients after cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: At admission, unstable patients were monitored during 4 hrs with transesophageal echocardiography and standard hemodynamic monitoring. The critical care physician evaluated the patients based on all information except the transesophageal echocardiography at 0, 2, and 4 hrs and formulated a hypothesis on the most likely cause of hemodynamic instability. Transesophageal echocardiography information was provided after each evaluation. To evaluate interobserver variability, all the hemodynamic and echocardiographic information was gathered, randomized, and evaluated by five clinicians for the hemodynamic data and five echocardiographers for the transesophageal echocardiography data. The evaluators were blinded to all other information. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate agreement. Impact of transesophageal echocardiography was assessed retrospectively by using the Deutsch scale. RESULTS: Twenty patients qualified for the study. The agreement between the hemodynamic and echocardiographic diagnosis showed a kappa at admission, 2 hrs, and 4 hrs of 0.33, 0.47, and 0.28. The interobserver agreement for the initial diagnosis (p =.014) and between all evaluators (p <.001) was significantly higher in the echocardiographic compared with the hemodynamic group. The transesophageal echocardiographic information was considered retrospectively to be essential in 34% and valuable in 34% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: These observations support the belief that transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring in the intensive care unit is associated with higher interobserver agreement in diagnosing and excluding significant causes of hemodynamic instability for postoperative cardiac surgical patients.