State of the National Emergency Department Workforce: Who Provides Care Where?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the current US emergency medicine workforce in terms of clinician type and examine rural and urban emergency medicine workforce differences. METHODS: Using the 2014 Medicare Public Use Files, we performed a cross-sectional study of all clinicians receiving reimbursement for evaluation and management (E/M) services (levels 1 to 5) to Medicare fee-for-service Part B beneficiaries in the emergency department. Providers were defined as emergency physicians, nonemergency physicians, or advanced practice providers, corresponding with the Medicare Public Use Files data set. The primary outcome was the number of clinicians providing greater than 10 E/M claims tabulated as a distinct encounter. Urbanicity data were obtained from the National Bureau of Economic Research. RESULTS: Of 58,641 unique emergency medicine clinicians, 35,856 (61.1%) were classified as emergency physicians, 8,397 (14.3%) as nonemergency physicians, and 14,360 (24.5%) as advanced practice providers. Among nonemergency physicians categorized as emergency medicine clinicians, family practice and internal medicine predominated (41.7% and 19.9%, respectively). Among advanced practice providers, physician assistants (68.4%) and nurse practitioners (31.5%) predominated. A total of 58,565 emergency medicine clinicians were mapped to 2,291 US counties or equivalents. Urban counties had a higher proportion of emergency physicians (63.9%) compared with rural counties (44.8%); 27.1% of counties had no emergency medicine clinicians and 41.4% of counties had no emergency physicians reimbursed by Medicare fee-for-service Part B. CONCLUSION: This work establishes a new baseline estimate of the emergency care workforce, encompassing nearly 60,000 emergency medicine clinicians, of whom fewer than 2 in 3 were emergency physicians. Notable differences exist in the type of clinician staffing of emergency care between urban and rural communities.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2017-2018).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine-sponsored residency and fellowship programs, as well as the residents and fellows training in those programs. We present the 2018 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency and Fellowship Training Information (2016-2017).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents training in those programs. We present the 2017 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.

American Board of Emergency Medicine Report on Residency Training Information (2015-2016).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents training in those programs. We present the 2016 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.

The American Board of Emergency Medicine Maintenance of Certification Summit.

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) convened a summit of stakeholders in Emergency Medicine (EM) to critically review the ABEM Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Program. OBJECTIVE: The newly introduced American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) 2015 MOC Standards require that the ABMS Member Boards, including ABEM, "engage in continual quality monitoring and improvement of its Program for MOC …" ABEM sought to have the EM community participate in the quality improvement process. DISCUSSION: A review of the ABMS philosophy of MOC and requirements for MOC were presented, followed by an exposition of the ABEM MOC Program. Roundtable discussions included strengths of the program and opportunities for improvement; defining, teaching, and assessing professionalism; identifying and filling competency gaps; and enhancing relevancy and adding value to the ABEM MOC Program. CONCLUSIONS: Several suggestions to improve the ABEM MOC Program were discussed. ABEM will consider these recommendations when developing its next revision of the ABEM MOC Program.

American Board of Emergency Medicine report on residency training information (2014-2015).

The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency programs and the residents in those programs. We present the 2015 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.

Emergency department quality improvement activity: an inventory from the American Board of Emergency Medicine Maintenance of Certification program.

OBJECTIVES: The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program requires every ABEM-certified physician to attest to participating in a quality improvement (QI) activity every 5 years. Understanding the type and frequency of these QI activities could inform the emergency medicine community about the variety of QI activities in which emergency physicians (EPs) are involved. These QI activities could provide ideas for the development of additional quality measures. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study of self-reported QI activity attestations from the ABEM MOC program during 2013. Attestations were provided by ABEM-certified EPs using the ABEM MOC website. The type, number, and cumulative frequency of activities are reported. RESULTS: ABEM received 9,380 attestations for QI activities in 91 different categories. The three most commonly reported activities were acute myocardial infarction-percutaneous coronary intervention within 90 minutes of arrival (includes door-to-balloon time), door-to-doctor times, and throughput time measures. These three activities comprised 36.4% of attestations. More than half (54.4%) of the attestations were captured by the five most frequently attested activities, 67.1% by the top seven categories, and 89.9% by the top 21 categories. Of these 21 categories, 10 involved clinical protocols, nine were time-centered measures, and two were patient-centered activities. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates that diverse QI activities occur in emergency departments (EDs) across the United States. The majority of reported projects are nested in a few categories, following recognized areas of emphasis in emergency care, particularly in areas using time-sensitive metrics.

Report on residency training information (2011-2012), American Board of Emergency Medicine.

The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) gathers extensive background information on emergency medicine residency training programs and the residents in those programs. We present the 2012 annual report on the status of US emergency medicine training programs.

Professional organizations in the emergency department.

It is not so important the specific professional organizations to which one belongs, but rather one's activity in the organization and his or her willingness to get involved and contribute to it. The relevance of a professional organization to a member of the ED staff is only as valid as the level of participation by that member in the professional organization. Membership in any organization, including a professional organization, is a contractual two-way street. The individual or the group of individuals gives something to the professional organization and the professional organization gives something back to the individual or the group of individuals. The relationship is only as strong a link as the effort that both parties are willing to commit. There are also many instances in which individuals in the ED are passive beneficiaries or recipients of activities and functions of a professional organization because the professional organization provides benefits to all members of a class without requiring membership. An excellent example of this is national legislation and the regulations that follow, such as EMTALA and Medicare funding. Professional organizations can play many roles in the EDs of America. Their relative applicability and need depends entirely on the unique characteristics of each ED and its staff.