Prediction of prolonged treatment course for depressive and anxiety disorders in an outpatient setting: The Leiden routine outcome monitoring study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to improve clinical identification of patients with a prolonged treatment course for depressive and anxiety disorders early in treatment. METHOD: We conducted a cohort study in 1.225 adult patients with a depressive or anxiety disorders in psychiatric specialty care setting between 2007 and 2011, with at least two Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) assessments within 6 months. With logistic regression, we modelled baseline age, gender, ethnicity, education, marital status, housing situation, employment status, psychiatric comorbidity and both baseline and 1st follow-up BSI scores to predict prolonged treatment course (>2 years). Based on the regression coefficients, we present an easy to use risk prediction score. RESULTS: BSI at 1st follow-up proved to be a strong predictor for both depressive and anxiety disorders (OR = 2.17 (CI95% 1.73-2.74); OR = 2.52 (CI95% 1.86-3.23)). The final risk prediction score included BSI 1st follow-up and comorbid axis II disorder for depressive disorder, for anxiety disorders BSI 1st follow-up and age were included. For depressive disorders, for 28% of the patients with the highest scores, the positive predictive value for a prolonged treatment course was60% (sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.81). For anxiety disorders, for 35% of the patients with the highest scores, the positive predictive value for a prolonged treatment course was 52% (sensitivity 0.55, specificity 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: A high level of symptoms at 2-6 months of follow-up is a strong predictor for prolonged treatment course. This facilitates early identification of patients at risk of a prolonged course of treatment; in a relatively easy way by a self-assessed symptom severity.

A Validation Study of the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ) Compared With the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus).

BACKGROUND: There is a need for brief screening methods for psychiatric disorders in clinical practice. This study assesses the validity and accuracy of a brief self-report screening questionnaire, the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ), in detecting psychiatric disorders in a study group comprising the general population and psychiatric outpatients aged 18 years and older. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the WSQ is an adequate test to screen for the presence of depressive and anxiety disorders in clinical practice. METHODS: Participants were 1292 adults (1117 subjects from the general population and 175 psychiatric outpatients), aged 18 to 65 years. The discriminant characteristics of the WSQ were examined in relation to the ("gold standard") Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Plus (MINI-Plus) disorders, by means of sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs). RESULTS: The specificity of the WSQ to individually detect depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, and alcohol abuse or dependence ranged from 0.89 to 0.97 for most disorders, with the exception of post-traumatic stress disorder (0.52) and specific phobia (0.73). The sensitivity values ranged from 0.67 to 1.00, with the exception of depressive disorder (0.56) and alcohol abuse or dependence (0.56). Given the low prevalence of separate disorders in the general population sample, NPVs were extremely high across disorders (≥0.97), whereas PPVs were of poor strength (range 0.02-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this study group, the WSQ was a relatively good screening tool to identify individuals without a depressive or anxiety disorder, as it accurately identified those unlikely to suffer from these disorders (except for post-traumatic stress disorders and specific phobias). However, in case of a positive WSQ screening result, further diagnostic procedures are required.

Characteristics of suicidal outpatients with mood, anxiety and somatoform disorders: The role of childhood abuse and neglect.

BACKGROUND: The most prevalent psychiatric disorders are mood, anxiety and somatoform (MAS) disorders which show high mutual comorbidity, childhood trauma and elevated risk of suicidality. So far, no studies have compared suicide risk in a secondary care population with comorbid MAS disorders. This gap was taken as starting point for the study. AIMS: In comparing suicidal and non-suicidal MAS patients, the following was examined: suicide risk in the three disorder groups, socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, occurrence of childhood trauma types and contribution of childhood trauma to suicidality. METHODS: This cross-sectional study compared suicidal (n = 316) versus non-suicidal comorbid MAS outpatients (n = 929) by means of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus (MINI-Plus), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36), Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Short Form (DAPP-SF) and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). RESULTS: Compared to non-suicidal MAS patients, suicidal MAS patients mostly had mood disorders (single/comorbid), multiple diagnoses, worse functioning, more personality pathology (self-harm) and more childhood neglect and abuse. CONCLUSION: Especially (comorbid) depressed patients are at risk for suicide, and routine screening and monitoring of childhood trauma and suicidality in them are recommended, along with the timely deployment of appropriate trauma-focused psychotherapy.