Joint space predicts THA after hip arthroscopy in patients 50 years and older.

BACKGROUND: All patients considering joint-preserving hip arthroscopy should be educated on the risk of THA after arthroscopy. The degree of radiographic osteoarthritis predicts subsequent THA. To provide patients with the best information, the best radiographic measure that predicts THA after hip arthroscopy should be identified. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined if Tönnis grade, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, or joint space narrowing was superior in predicting THA after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 203 patients 50 years of age or older treated with hip arthroscopy between March 2007 and October 2010. Of these, 96 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Sixty-five did not undergo THAs during the followup time (non-THA group) and 31 patients did (THA group). We determined Tönnis grade, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and/or joint space narrowing before arthroscopy. The median followup for the non-THA group was 54 months (95% confidence interval, 49.9-58.9 months). RESULTS: In 81% of the patients, joint space accurately predicted THA or non-THA, whereas Kellgren-Lawrence was accurate in 73% and Tönnis grade was accurate in 65%. On binary logistic regression, the only predictor (r(2) = 0.45) of THA was joint space of 2 mm or less. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring joint space by determining if any measurement is 2 mm or less predicts patients progressing to THA after hip arthroscopy approximately 80% of the time. At this early time point, joint space measurements were the most accurate predictor of THA and should be used in patient education to define the risk of early failure from hip arthroscopy.

Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters of adult hip structural anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic evaluation of the hip is extremely important in the diagnosis and treatment decisionmaking process for pre-arthritic hip disease. Many different radiographic measurements have been described as indicators of underlying structural hip deformity. The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of various musculoskeletal physicians in performing selected measurements of adult structural hip anatomy. METHODS: A blinded review of 45 sets of radiographs from patients with developmental dysplasia, femoro-acetabular impingement, and normal anatomy was performed. Data points included the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), vertical-center-anterior angle (VCA), head-neck offset ratio (UNO), alpha angle, Tönnis angle, Tönnis osteoarthritis grade and a radiographic diagnosis. One orthopaedic fellow, two orthopaedic residents, and two attending musculoskeletal physiatrists analyzed radiographs on two separate occasions. One sports medicine orthopaedic attending physician completed a single analysis of the image sets. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability was established using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for continuous variables. Agreement regarding categorical variables was performed using the kappa coefficient RESULTS: Excellent intraobserver reliability was found for the following: LCEA (ICC = 0.88), VCA (0.88), Tönnis angle (0.83), HNO on the frog lateral (0.78), alpha angle on the frog lateral (0.76), HNO on the cross-table lateral (0.75), and angle alpha on the cross-table lateral (0.76). Intraobserver reliability for osteoarthritis grade was poor (weighted kappa = 0.57). For all data points, interobserver reliability was considerably worse, with 95% confidence intervals spanning below 0.55. CONCLUSIONS: While the described measurements of adult structural hip anatomy provide excellent reliability for a given reader, these measurements are less reliable across readers. Taken in isolation, these measurements, as performed by observers with varied clinical experience and clinical backgrounds, are limited in determining a consistent radiographic diagnosis.

Comparative systematic review of the open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement.

PURPOSE: To analyze the current approaches to the surgical management of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS: Thirteen relevant queries were used in four search engines (PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and the Cochrane Review) with a resultant 5,856 articles. Eighteen peer-reviewed treatment outcome studies met the inclusion criteria with minimum 1-year follow-up of the surgical treatment of skeletal pathoanatomy and associated chondrolabral pathology in skeletally mature patients with FAI. RESULTS: There were 6 open surgical dislocation, 4 mini-open, and 8 arthroscopic studies, all with Levels of Evidence III or IV. The only prospective studies were in the arthroscopic category. Outcome data were extracted and analyzed with respect to surgical efficacy, failure rates, and complications. CONCLUSIONS: The open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic methods for treating symptomatic FAI are effective in improving pain and function in short-term to midterm studies and are relatively safe procedures. The historical gold standard of open dislocation surgery had a comparatively high major complication rate primarily because of trochanteric osteotomy-related issues. The mini-open method showed comparable efficacy but a significant incidence of iatrogenic injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve in some studies. The arthroscopic method had surgical outcomes equal to or better than the other methods with a lower rate of major complications when performed by experienced surgeons.

Clinical and radiographic predictors of intra-articular hip disease in arthroscopy.

BACKGROUND: The arthroscopic treatment of intra-articular hip disease and associated structural abnormalities continues to evolve. Nevertheless, contemporary diagnostic tools have significant limitations in predicting severity of disease preoperatively. HYPOTHESIS: Clinical characteristics and radiographic parameters correlate with and predict intra-articular disease patterns in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In sum, 355 hips in 338 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical characteristics and radiographic findings (on anteroposterior pelvis and frog lateral radiographs) of mild dysplasia, cam, and pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement were compared with intraoperative labral and chondral disease patterns. RESULTS: Labral tears were present in 90.1% of hips, and acetabular cartilage lesions were present in 67.3%, including 41.7% with grade 3 or 4 chondromalacia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found male sex, older age (<30, 30-50, >50 years old), Tönnis osteoarthritis grade, and alpha angle >50° on frog lateral radiograph to be independently associated with increased risk of grade 3 or 4 acetabular chondromalacia (all P < .001). Insidious onset of pain (in contrast to acute onset) was independently associated with the presence of acetabular chondromalacia (P = .002). Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (alpha angle >50°) was strongly associated with more severe labral disease (P < .001). Findings of acetabular dysplasia and pincer femoroacetabular impingement did not remain significantly associated with acetabular chondral disease in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Several clinical and radiographic characteristics--most notably, male sex, older age, Tönnis grade, and elevated alpha angle--are associated with more severe intra-articular hip disease. The recognition of these associations between clinical and radiographic characteristics and hip disease patterns is important for patient selection, surgical planning, and patient counseling.

Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability.

Radiographic evaluation provides essential information regarding the diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. We evaluated the ability of hip specialists to reliably identify important radiographic features and to make a diagnosis based on plain radiographs alone. Five hip specialists and one fellow performed a blinded radiographic review of 25 control hips, 25 hips with developmental dysplasia (DDH), and 27 with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). On two separate occasions, readers assessed acetabular version, inclination and depth, position of the femoral head center, head sphericity, head-neck offset, Tönnis grade, and joint congruency. Observers made a diagnosis categorizing each hip as normal, dysplastic, FAI, or combined DDH and FAI (features of both). Reliability was determined using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Intraobserver values were highest for acetabular inclination (kappa = 0.72) and determination of femoral head center position (kappa = 0.77). Interobserver reliability values were highest for acetabular inclination (kappa = 0.61) and Tönnis osteoarthritis grade (kappa = 0.59). All other measurements, including diagnosis, had kappa values less than 0.55. We concluded many of the standard radiographic parameters used to diagnose DDH and/or FAI are not reproducible. Accordingly, a more clear set of definitions and measurements must be developed to allow for more reliable diagnosis of early hip disease.

Upper extremity injuries in the National Football League: part II: elbow, forearm, and wrist injuries.

BACKGROUND: Very little information is available regarding the incidence, causative mechanisms, and expected duration of time lost following upper extremity injuries in professional American football players. HYPOTHESES: (1) Upper extremity injuries in professional American football players are a common cause of missed time from practice and game participation. (2) The effect of upper extremity injuries differs as a function of the site involved and the athlete's position. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study. METHODS: A retrospective review of all documented injuries to the elbow, forearm, and wrist sustained by all players in the National Football League over a 10-year period (1996-2005) was performed using the League's injury surveillance database. An injury was considered significant if it resulted in premature cessation of (or absence from) at least 1 practice, game, or training event. The data were analyzed from multiple perspectives, with emphasis on the type of injury, athlete position, and activity at the time of injury. RESULTS: There were 859 total injuries over the 10-year period: 58% involved the elbow, 30% involved the wrist, and 12% involved the forearm. Ligamentous injuries were the most common diagnosis in the elbow and wrist, with wrist sprains the most common of all diagnoses. Fractures were the most common injury occurring in the forearm. For all 3 anatomic locations, game injuries were much more common than practice injuries by a factor of 2.8 to 1. Forearm injuries led to a mean of 42 days lost, wrist injuries led to a mean of 27 days lost, and elbow injuries led to an average of 22 days lost. Fractures and dislocations led to the greatest amount of time lost (47 days and 53 days, respectively). Tackling was the activity most often (24%) implicated as causing injuries to the elbow, forearm, and wrist. Offensive and defensive linemen were most commonly injured. Elbow injuries were the most common at these positions, constituting approximately 75% of all injuries. Defensive backs sustained the greatest number of forearm injuries, approximately double the total number at any other position. CONCLUSION: Upper extremity trauma is a significant issue for professional football players. In particular, the high incidence rates of elbow injuries in linemen and forearm injuries in defensive backs warrant further scrutiny.

Upper extremity injuries in the National Football League: part I: hand and digital injuries.

BACKGROUND: Very little has been published regarding the incidence of and duration of time lost after hand injuries in professional American football players. HYPOTHESES: (1) Hand, first ray, and finger injuries in professional American football players represent a common cause of missed time from practice and game participation. (2) The effect of upper extremity injuries differs as a function of the anatomic site involved, injury type, and athlete's position. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiologic study. METHODS: A retrospective review of all documented injuries to the hand, first ray, and fingers sustained by American football players in the National Football League over a 10-year period (1996-2005) was performed using the League's injury surveillance database. The data were analyzed from multiple perspectives, with emphasis on the type of injury, athlete position, and activity at the time of injury. RESULTS: A total of 1385 injuries occurred to the hand, first ray, and fingers over the 10 seasons studied. Of these injuries, 48% involved the fingers, 30% involved the first ray, and 22% involved the hand, with game injuries more common than practice injuries at each location. Metacarpal fractures and proximal interphalangeal joint dislocations were the 2 most common injuries. Offensive and defensive linemen were the most likely to sustain a hand injury; 80% of hand injuries were metacarpal fractures. The most common injuries to the first ray were fractures (48%) and sprains (36%), which occurred most often in athletes playing a defensive secondary position. Finger injuries were most commonly dislocations at the level of the proximal interphalangeal joint, typically involving the ulnar 2 digits. Finger injuries were most common in wide receivers and defensive secondary players. The act of tackling produced the most injuries (28%). CONCLUSION: Upper extremity trauma, especially injury to the hand, first ray, and fingers, is a significant source of morbidity for professional football players. The results of this study may be used to implement preventive measures to help minimize these injuries.

Technical considerations in revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Revision ACL surgery is a technically demanding enterprise that requires meticulous preoperative planning and tempered postoperative expectations on the patient's part. Despite the complexities of the procedure, it is becoming more common as an increasing number of primary ACL reconstructions are being performed, expanding the pool of patients at risk for failure. Candidates for revision surgery should be selected carefully, focusing on those patients with recurrent instability rather than pain as their primary complaint. A thorough history and physical examination is essential, taking care to identify additional patholaxity that might contribute to a failed ACL reconstruction. To optimize outcomes, surgeons must take care to avoid common pitfalls in index and revision procedures. Femoral and tibial tunnels should be positioned anatomically, and staged bone grafting procedures should be considered if revision graft fixation may be compromised by tunnel defects. The type of graft must be carefully selected, appropriately tensioned, and securely fixed. Surgeons should have a number of techniques and instruments at their disposal for performing each of these steps, as the highly variable presentation of failed ACL reconstructions demands a versatile approach. Ultimately, with cautious rehabilitation, these techniques will allow for restoration of knee stability and, in many cases, an improvement in activity level.