Timing of Alveolar Bone Graft and Barriers to Care.

OBJECTIVE: The current standard timing for alveolar bone grafting (ABG) occurs during mixed dentition, typically between the ages of six and twelve. A delay in receiving this operation is associated with an increase in graft loss and an overall thinner maxilla. This study aims to determine whether socioeconomic barriers are associated with a delay in timely ABG. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients who received ABG at our institution since 2012. Patient demographics, cleft classifications, operative details, and surgical dates were examined. A logistic regression model was created using socioeconomic variables to predict patients receiving delayed ABG. Significant variables were then included in a backwards selection logistic regression, followed by a final analysis of maximum likelihood estimates. SETTING: Single-institution, primary cleft care center. PATIENTS: 202 patients with cleft palates who underwent ABG. INTERVENTIONS: ABG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Timing in which patients received ABG: standard (6-12 years) and delayed (>12 years). RESULTS: Female sex was a protective factor in the timing of ABG in our initial univariate analysis (OR = 0.44; p = .015). Socioeconomic factors resulting in delayed presentation for ABG include median income (OR = 1.0; p = .018) and public insurance status (OR = 3.75; p < .001). Median income, sex, and driving distance to the cleft clinic were not significant following backward elimination, however, private insurance status remained significant (OR = 3.71; p = .0001). CONCLUSION: Patients with public insurance are approximately 3.75 times more likely to receive ABG during permanent dentition. Multidisciplinary teams should work closely with patients on public insurance to ensure timely delivery of ABG.Level of Evidence III, Retrospective.

Pharyngeal Airway Changes Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis as Evaluated with Laryngoscopy.

PURPOSE: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) may improve airway grade in patients with Robin Sequence (RS), but little is known about the response of the oropharyngeal airway to the distraction process in cases of tongue base obstruction (TBAO). This study used drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) to evaluate the impact of MDO on the oropharynx. METHODS: RS patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were prospectively enrolled, and underwent DISE prior to MDO, and at the time of distractor removal. Laryngoscopy views, glossoptosis degree, polysomnography (PSG) results, oxygen saturations and airway measurements were compared pre- and post-MDO. RESULTS: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. At the time of distractor placement, a grade II laryngoscopic view was most frequently observed (63%), and one patient (5%) had a grade I view. Median obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI) improved after MDO (49.1 [30.2-74.0] to 9.1, [3.9-18.0], p ≤ .001). Median oxygen saturation nadir also improved (preoperative 69% [60-76] to 85% [82-91], p ≤ .001). At distractor removal, mean laryngoscopic view improved (p ≤ .002) with no views that were grade 3 or higher. Median intraoperative oropharyngeal width improved, (3.1 mm [2.8-4.4] to 6.0 mm [4.4-6.8], p ≤ .021), as did median cephalometric anteroposterior oropharyngeal width (3.5 mm [2.7-4.1] to 6.3 mm [5.6-8.2], p ≤ .002). CONCLUSION: Following MDO, RS patients with TBAO have an approximate doubling of oropharyngeal width and an improvement in laryngoscopic grade. These findings likely contribute to improved oxygenation, OAHI and ease of intubation.

Double-Reversed Costal Cartilage Graft for Nasal Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: Costal cartilage provides the ideal graft for reconstruction of the nasal dorsum and tip given its abundant supply and flexural strength. Nevertheless, autologous costal cartilage grafts can be plagued by warping. Several techniques have been devised to offset the intrinsic warping effects of cartilage, but current techniques have several disadvantages. Herein, we present a multimedia demonstration of the double-reversed technique for costal cartilage reconstruction. This strategy is unique in its dual axis of rotation to offset warp in all dimensions. This technique can be performed with conventional instruments, does not introduce foreign material, and provides robust support to counteract the often scarred and contracted soft tissue envelope.

Long-term aesthetic and photogrammetric outcomes in non-syndromic unicoronal synostosis: comparison of fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis and fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling.

BACKGROUND: Fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR) is among the most common surgical approaches for unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS), although some data demonstrate failure to achieve long-term aesthetic normalcy, leading some to seek alternative treatment paradigms such as fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO). This study compares long-term aesthetic outcomes of patients with UCS treated with FOAR and FODO. METHODS: Twenty patients (four males) with non-syndromic UCS presenting to our institution and undergoing distraction were compared to a matched cohort of 20 patients (six males) undergoing FOAR. Clinical photographs and ImageJ were used to quantify periorbital anatomy including palpebral fissures, pupil-to-brow distance (PTB), and margin-reflex distance (MRD1) in pixels. Whitaker classification was blindly assigned by craniofacial surgeons. RESULTS: Photogrammetric analysis and Mann-Whitney U tests demonstrated significantly improved postoperative symmetry in distraction patients for palpebral width (p = 0.020), MRD1 (p = 0.045), and canthal tilt (p = 0.010). Average Whitaker classification scores between FOAR (1.94) and distraction (1.79) cohorts were similar (p = 0.374). CONCLUSIONS: UCS patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in periorbital symmetry, with distraction patients demonstrating superior results in palpebral width and canthal tilt. FOAR and FODO patients achieved similar Whitaker classification scores. These cohorts will be followed until craniofacial maturity prior to making any definitive conclusions.

A Longitudinal Study of Improvement in Nasal Airway Obstruction after Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Nasal airway obstruction is an increasingly recognized phenomenon in patients with cleft lip and/or palate and has the potential to significantly affect quality of life in this patient population. To date, the effect of secondary cleft rhinoplasty on cleft-related nasal airway obstruction has not been studied. METHODS: Patients undergoing secondary cleft rhinoplasty at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia from 2015 to 2021 were identified. Preoperative and postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores were recorded. Alterations in scores were evaluated for variation depending on patient characteristics, operative maneuvers, and postoperative nasal stenting. RESULTS: Nasal airway obstruction was present in mild to moderate severity in patients before secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Postoperatively, obstruction improved or resolved in the domains of nasal blockage/obstruction, trouble breathing through the nose, and ability to get enough air through the nose during exertion (P < 0.05). Overall composite Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scores improved (P < 0.05). Lateral crural strut grafting was associated with improvement in nasal blockage, whereas alar revision and tip sutures were associated with worsening in specific nasal symptoms. Patients who underwent nasal stenting were found to report less trouble breathing after surgery than patients who did not (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal airway obstruction is present in mild to moderate severity in patients with cleft lip and/or palate, and the subjective severity of obstruction is decreased by secondary cleft rhinoplasty. Specific operative maneuvers are associated with alterations in nasal airway obstructive symptoms, and nasal stenting is associated with an improvement in trouble breathing after secondary cleft rhinoplasty. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Racial Disparities in the Timing of Alveolar Bone Grafting.

Standard bone grafting between ages 6 and 12 has become the preferred treatment of choice for alveolar clefts. Given the importance of surgical timing in complete cleft palate repairs, it is important to identify any populations at-risk for delayed alveolar bone grafting. The purpose of this study is to identify whether a racial disparity is present nationally in the timing of alveolar bone grafting.Retrospective analysis Setting: Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).Inclusion criteria involved patients who underwent alveolar bone grafting identified by current procedure terminology (CPT) code 42210 between years 2012 and 2019. Patients were stratified by age at time of operation based on the following parameters: early bone grafting (before 6 years of age), standard bone grafting (between 6 and 12 years of age), and late bone grafting (after 12 years of age).Racial and ethnic differences in the age of patients at the time of alveolar bone grafting.Overall, 20.28% of the cohort received alveolar bone graft after 12 years of age. African American (29.33%) and Hispanic (24.42%) patients received late alveolar bone grafting more frequently than other racial and ethnic groups (P < .001).Racial and ethnic disparities are present in the frequency at which patients receive late alveolar bone grafting for complete cleft palates. Given the suboptimal surgical results of late compared to standard alveolar bone grafting it is important to further investigate the driving factors of these disparities.

Multimodal Treatment of Robin Sequence Utilizing Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure.

Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may each have a role in effectively treating tongue-based airway obstruction (TBAO) in Robin sequence (RS). This study describes longitudinal outcomes after treatment of TBAO with CPAP and/or MDO.Retrospective cohort study.Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.A total of 129 patients with RS treated with CPAP and/or MDO from 2009 to 2019 were reviewed. Subjects receiving baseline and at least one follow-up polysomnogram were included. 55 who underwent MDO ± CPAP and 9 who received CPAP-only treatment were included.Patient characteristics, feeding, and polysomnographic data were compared and generalized linear mixed modeling performed.Baseline obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) was greater in the MDO-treated group (median x˜ = 33.7 [interquartile range: 26.5-54.5] than the CPAP-treated group (x˜ = 20.3[13.3-36.7], P ≤ .033). There was significant reduction in OAHI following treatment with CPAP and MDO modalities, P ≤ .001. SpO2 nadir after MDO was lower in syndromic (x˜ = 85.0[81.0-87.9] compared to nonsyndromic patients (x˜ = 88.4[86.8-90.5], P ≤ .005.) CPAP was utilized following MDO in 2/24 (8.3%) of nonsyndromic and 16/31 (51.6%) of syndromic subjects (P ≤ .001,) for a median duration of 414 days. Three patients (5%) underwent tracheostomy, all had MDO. Nasogastric tube feeding at hospital discharge was more common following MDO (44, 80%) than CPAP-only (4, 44.4%, P ≤ .036), but did not differ at 6-month follow-up (P ≥ .376).CPAP appears to effectively reduce obstructive apnea in patients with RS and moderate TBAO and be a useful adjunct in syndromic patients following MDO with improved but persistent obstruction.

Cleft Palate Repair in Robin Sequence following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Compared to Tongue-Lip Adhesion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the timing and safety of cleft palate (CP) repair in patients with Robin sequence (RS) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) or tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) for airway obstruction. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary Pediatric Hospital during 2004-2020. PATIENTS: 148 patients with RS underwent MDO, 66 met inclusion by having MDO and followed by palatoplasty. 26 patients with RS underwent TLA, 14 met inclusion by having TLA and followed by palatoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, hospital/operative details, postoperative complications, and polysomnographic (PSG) data were compared. RESULTS: Groups were well-matched except more patients with syndromes underwent MDO (N = 27, 41%, P ≤ .002). In the MDO and TLA cohorts, mean CP repair age was 12.8 ± 1.9 months and 14.6 ± 1.6 months, respectively (P ≤ .002). Despite the earlier CP repair in the MDO group, there were no differences in peri-operative complication rates after palatoplasty in either group. All sleep respiratory parameters improved after MDO/TLA prior to palatoplasty P ≤ .050. All PSG parameters remained significantly improved after palatoplasty compared to preoperative values, P ≤ .043. Obstructive apnea hypopnea index and Oxygen saturation nadir further improved after palatoplasty within the MDO group, P ≤ .050, while no changes in the TLA group, P ≥ .500. CONCLUSIONS: MDO was associated with earlier age at palatoplasty than TLA with a similar perioperative risk profile. In those patients with pre- and post-palatoplasty PSG data, palatoplasty was not associated with a deterioration in PSG parameters, and in fact in the MDO group, PSG data improved.

Speech Outcomes following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Robin Sequence: Midchildhood Results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare midchildhood speech outcomes in patients with nonsyndromic Robin sequence with cleft palate (RSCP) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to patients with nonsyndromic Veau class I and Veau class II cleft palate (CP). METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients with nonsyndromic Robin sequence from 2000 to 2017, comparing those who underwent MDO to patients with nonsyndromic CP. Demographics, operative details, length of hospital stay, complications, and Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale scores were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria in the MDO group with 127 patients as controls. Despite similar median age (RSCP, 4.5 years; CP only, 4.6 years) and Veau cleft type at early evaluation, there was a significant increase in composite Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale score within the MDO cohort ( P ≤ 0.002); specifically, with worse visible nasal emission ( P ≤ 0.007), hypernasality ( P ≤ 0.001), and compensatory articulation ( P ≤ 0.015). However, these differences were not present at age-matched midchildhood evaluation (median, RSCP, 6.5; CP only, 7.1; P ≥ 0.092). Median age-matched follow-up was 6.4 years in the MDO group and 7.1 years in the control group ( P ≥ 0.136). There was also no difference in the rate of secondary speech surgery at midchildhood evaluation ( P ≥ 0.688). CONCLUSIONS: The authors' retrospective comparison of speech outcomes in RSCP versus CP only demonstrates no difference in midchildhood speech, conflicting with recent reports. Although patients with Robin sequence treated with MDO had worse visible nasal emission, hypernasality, and compensatory articulation in early childhood, this appears to have resolved in the interim without additional intervention. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to fully understand the speech ramifications of RSCP. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Facial Scars: Do Position and Orientation Matter?

BACKGROUND: This study tested the core tenets of how facial scars are perceived by characterizing layperson response to faces with scars. The authors predicted that scars closer to highly viewed structures of the face (i.e., upper lip and lower lid), scars aligned against resting facial tension lines, and scars in the middle of anatomical subunits of the face would be rated less favorably. METHODS: Volunteers aged 18 years and older from the United States were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk to complete a face rating survey. Scars were digitally added in different locations and orientations for a total of 14 unique scars added to each face. Each participant rated 50 different faces on confidence, friendliness, and attractiveness. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: A total of 88,850 ratings [82,990 scarred (93.4 percent)] for attractiveness, friendliness, and confidence were analyzed. In univariate linear mixed effects models, the presence of a facial scar did not significantly impact attractiveness (ß = 0.016, SE = 0.014, z = 1.089, p = 0.276). A second set of linear mixed effects models identified interactions between location, subunit placement, and orientation to facial tension lines. Scars located on the lower lid mid subunit perpendicular to facial tension lines were rated less attractive (ß = -0.065, SE = 0.028, z = -2.293, p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: On average, a single well-healed facial scar does not negatively affect first impressions of attractiveness, confidence, or friendliness. Specific scar location and orientation combinations, however, such as a perpendicular scar at the mid-lower eyelid, may result in lower perceived attractiveness, confidence, and friendliness. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Cleft Rhinoplasty: Does Timing and Utilization of Cartilage Grafts Affect Perioperative Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and perioperative complications of different reconstructive strategies to correct cleft nasal deformity, with particular attention paid to type and timing of cartilage grafting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted of cleft rhinoplasty performed between 2012 and 2017 in North America utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program- Pediatric hospital network. Medical/surgical complications, reoperations, and readmissions within 30 days postoperatively were analyzed with appropriate statistics. RESULTS: During the study interval, 3317 pediatric patients underwent cleft rhinoplasty, with 8.0% involving the use of cartilage grafts. Ear cartilage was significantly more commonly used for intermediate repair, whereas rib cartilage was more commonly used for late repair (P=0.006). Overall, rhinoplasties with ear cartilage grafts had shorter procedure durations than those without cartilage grafts (P=0.005), whereas those with rib cartilage grafts had increased procedure duration (P<0.001). The use of cartilage grafts was not associated with increased complications in either intermediate or late cleft rhinoplasty. Patients with bilateral clefts were more likely to undergo rhinoplasty with cartilage grafts overall (P=0.047) and with cartilage grafts for late reconstruction (P=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Ear cartilage is most frequently utilized for intermediate repair, whereas rib cartilage is most frequently utilized for late repair during cleft rhinoplasty. Ear cartilage grafts are associated with significantly decreased procedure duration, whereas rib cartilage grafts are associated with significantly increased procedure duration. Not surprisingly, cleft rhinoplasty is relatively safe, with a 2% overall short-term complication rate.

How Low Should We Go? Safety and Craniometric Impact of the Low Occipital Osteotomy in Posterior Vault Remodeling.

BACKGROUND: A larger volume cranial vault expansion is likely facilitated by a low posterior cranial osteotomy beneath the torcula; however, this may impart an increased risk of venous bleeding. The authors compared the safety of infratorcular versus supratorcular osteotomy in patients undergoing posterior vault reconstruction or posterior vault distraction osteogenesis and analyzed volumetric changes. METHODS: Patients undergoing initial posterior vault reconstruction or distraction osteogenesis between 2009 and 2021 at the authors' institution were grouped by occipital osteotomy location and analyzed retrospectively. Craniometric analysis was performed if patients had high-resolution computed tomography scans available within 180 days preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were included: 106 (57 percent) who underwent posterior vault distraction osteogenesis and 81 (43 percent) who underwent posterior vault reconstruction. Infratorcular osteotomy was more common in reconstruction [ n = 65 (80 percent)] than in distraction osteogenesis [ n = 61 (58 percent); p < 0.002]. Blood transfused was similar between low and high osteotomy cohorts in the distraction osteogenesis ( p = 0.285) and reconstruction ( p = 0.342) groups. However, median transfused blood volume per kilogram of patient weight was greater in the low versus high osteotomy distraction osteogenesis ( p = 0.010) and reconstruction ( p = 0.041) cohorts. Intraoperative venous sinus injury was rare. In the distraction osteogenesis cohort, there was increased median intracranial volumetric gain in the low (263 ml) compared with the high osteotomy cohort (127 ml; p = 0.043); however, when controlled for distraction distance, only a trend was observed ( p = 0.221). Patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis showed a larger median intracranial volume increase (168 ml) compared with those undergoing reconstruction (73 ml; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Infratorcular osteotomy can be performed safely in most patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling and does not appear to be associated with greater hemodynamic instability or sinus injury. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Endoscope-Assisted Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis.

SUMMARY: Anterior cranial vault fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis is a promising treatment modality for children with unicoronal craniosynostosis. A minimally invasive, endoscope-assisted approach offers the additional potential benefits of less scalp scarring, decreased blood loss, and decreased scalp dissection. In this article, the authors present a novel technique for minimally invasive, endoscope-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis.

Utility of Preoperative Helmet Molding Therapy in Patients With Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to review our institution's experience using helmet molding therapy in children with isolated non-syndromic sagittal craniosynostosis before placement of cranial springs and provide objective measurements of craniometric changes to help determine its role in treatment.Patients who underwent preoperative helmet molding therapy for sagittal craniosynostosis were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional surface tomography scans were used to measure head circumference, cranial width, cranial length, cranial index (CI), and cranial vault asymmetry.Seventeen patients underwent orthotic helmeting therapy before spring mediated cranial vault expansion. Patients spent a median of 48 days (interquartile range [IQR] 32, 57) in preoperative orthotic helmeting therapy. There were increases in both cranial width and length post-helmeting (median: 107.5 mm [IQR 104.8, 110.4] versus 115.6 mm [IQR 114.5, 119.3]; P < 0.001) (median: 152.8 mm [IQR 149.2, 154.9] versus 156.8 mm [IQR 155.0, 161.5]; P < 0.001), respectively. There was a greater increase in cranial width (P = 0.015). Consequently, patients' CI improved after preoperative helmeting (median: 0.702 [IQR 0.693, 0.717] versus 0.739 [0.711, 0.752]; P < 0.001). There was no evidence of growth restriction from helmeting (pre-helmeting Head circumference [HC]: median 96.8 percentile [IQR 90.6, 99.9] versus post-helmeting HC: 98.7 percentile [IQR 94.7, 99.8]; P = 0.109).Preoperative helmeting in patients with non-syndromic isolated sagittal craniosynostosis can be used to improve CI before surgical correction. Significant benefits can be achieved in shorter preoperative helmeting durations than previously reported with no evidence of cranial growth restriction, which supports its feasibility and utility in children undergoing spring mediated cranial vault expansion.

Transverse Distraction Osteogenesis for Posterior Narrowing of the Cranial Vault.

SUMMARY: Although conventional posterior vault distraction osteogenesis is known to achieve the greatest improvement in intracranial volume, anteroposterior expansion of the cranial vault is not always ideal in certain head shapes. Transverse posterior vault distraction osteogenesis is an alternative reconstructive strategy in patients presenting with recalcitrant multisuture craniosynostosis resulting in scaphocephaly with posterior narrowing. The authors present a multimedia demonstration of placing the cranial hinge points at the superior anterior aspect of the bone segments in order to achieve increased intracranial volume and significant improvement in posterior head shape, while preserving normal anterior skull dimensions.

What is the Role of Midfacial Sutures in the Development of Maxillary Hypoplasia in Children With Cleft Palate?

ABSTRACT: Maxillary hypoplasia is common in patients with cleft lip and palate (CL/P), and its etiology is incompletely understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate facial suture patency in patients with CL/P and maxillary hypoplasia. The authors hypothesize that patients with CL/P will demonstrate higher rates of premature midfacial suture fusion in comparison to unaffected controls. Skeletally mature patients with CL/P and midface hypoplasia were identified, along with a cohort of unaffected age- and sex-matched controls. High-resolution facial computed tomography scans were evaluated for the presence of facial suture fusion. Utilizing a previously published suture fusion grading scale, the facial sutures were classified as open, partially open, closed, or pathologically absent. Thirty-one CL/P patients with midface hypoplasia were identified, with age and sex-matched controls. The frequency of intermaxillary suture fusion did not differ between patients with CL/P and unaffected controls (P  > 0.05.) Pathologic absence of the midpalatal suture was more commonly present in patients with CL/ P and midface hypoplasia in comparison to unaffected controls (P < 0.05.) The role of midfacial sutures in the development of midfacial hypoplasia seen in CLP has not previously been studied or described. Our data show that the midpalatal suture is frequently pathologically absent in patients with CL/P and maxillary hypoplasia. The authors did not identify statistically significant differences in other midfacial sutures between patients with CL/P and controls, leading us to conclude that midfacial sutures may not play a key role in the development of midfacial hypoplasia.

Nasal Obstruction Evaluation After LeFort I Osteotomy: A Pilot Study.

ABSTRACT: Previous literature has documented changes in nasal obstruction after acute LeFort I osteotomy. However, there is a paucity of studies that evaluate distraction-mediated LeFort I (DO-LFI) without concomitant intranasal interventions using the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale in Class III patients. The purpose of this study is to objectively evaluate nasal obstruction quality of life through the NOSE scale in patients undergoing DO-LFI. Inclusion into the study required both a preoperative (1 year ≤ date of service) and postoperative (≥6 months and ≤2 years) NOSE scale administration. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scales were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. There was a significant difference in composite NOSE scales, x̃ = 8.0 (interquartile range: 4.0-11.0), x̃ = 1.0 (interquartile range: 1.0-3.0), P < 0.017, preoperatively and postoperatively respectfully. Additionally, when looking at individual components of the NOSE scale, nasal congestion or stuffiness, and trouble breathing through nose were significantly improved after DO-LFI (P < 0.017). Nasal blockage or obstruction (P > 0.084) and trouble breathing when exercising (P > 0.076) trended towards significant improvement, as well. Trouble sleeping did not differ, P > 0.611. We elucidate, in this pilot study, that there is an association between DO-LFI and patient reported nasal obstructive symptoms. Future prospective studies utilizing the NOSE scale are needed to determine causality.

Endoscopic-Assisted Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis: Initial Patient Report.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce a novel endoscopic-assisted approach for creation of osteotomies and distractor hardware placement for unicoronal craniosynostosis. METHODS: Only three small incisions are performed, one at the anterior fontanelle, pterional region, and upper lateral blepharoplasty location. Unicoronal strip craniectomy and osteotomies in temporal bone, nasofrontal junction, lateral orbital rim, sphenoid wing, orbital roof, and contralateral frontal bone are performed through these incisions with the assistance of a 30° 5-mm endoscope. One linear cranial distractor is inserted through the pterional incision and fixated across the unicoronal suturectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis has been performed on 3 patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis. Median age at surgery was 5.4 months (95%CI 5.0-6.1). Median operative duration was 98 minutes (95%CI 91-112), and estimated blood loss was 25 mL (95%CI 15-150). Median length of distraction achieved was 25.7 mm (95%CI 21.9-28.0), based on lateral skull x-rays obtained on the last day of activation. Distractors were removed 2.3 months postoperatively (95%CI 2.1-3.1), and operative duration of distractor removal was 20 minutes (95%CI 19-29). There was 1 complication, a transient cerebrospinal fluid leak thought to have been caused by a pinpoint injury to the dura at the nasofrontal junction, which was managed expectantly and resolved spontaneously by the fourth postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic-assisted fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis is a promising treatment modality for children with unicoronal craniosynostosis combining the benefits of distraction osteogenesis with a minimally invasive approach. Additional experience and follow-up are needed to determine its utility, safety, and longevity.

Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Tongue-Based Airway Obstruction Without Micrognathia.

PURPOSE: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) effectively treats tongue-based airway obstruction (TBAO) in micrognathic patients with Robin Sequence. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis may also address TBAO in certain nonmicrognathic patients who have severe obstructive apnea, although there is no current literature to guide MDO use in these atypical patients. This study describes outcomes of MDO in a series of patients with TBAO without micrognathia. METHODS: Patients who underwent MDO for TBAO from 2013-20 were reviewed, and patients with micrognathia were excluded. Study subjects received baseline/follow up polysomnography. Polysomnography variables, including Obstructive Apnea Hypopnea Index, oxyhemoglobin saturation nadir (SpO2 nadir), percent sleep time end tidal CO2 greater than 50 mm Hg (%ETCO2 > 50), and respiratory-related arousals were compared before and after MDO. Demographics, syndromic/cleft palate status, airway anomalies, respiratory support, and feeding outcomes were collected. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-four patients underwent MDO during this study period; 5 were nonmicrognathic and included in analysis. Sixty percent (n = 3) of the cohort was syndromic: 1 patient each had Trisomy 9, Beckwith Wiedemann syndrome, and duplicated pituitary gland plus syndrome. Forty percent (n = 2) of patients had a cleft palate, 60% (n = 3) had laryngomalacia, and 40% had tracheomalacia. Median (range) age at MDO was 53 days (47-167 days), and median length of distraction was 16 mm (14-20 mm). After MDO, median Obstructive Apnea Hypopnea Index decreased from x̃ = 60.7/h (11.6-109.4) to x̃ = 5.3/h (3.5-19.3) (P = 0.034). SpO2 nadir increased (69% [58-74] to 85% [80-88], P = 0.011), and median %ETCO2 > 50 mm Hg decreased (5.8% [5.2-30.1] to 0.0% [0.0-1.3], P ≤ 0.043). Continuous positive airway pressure was used by all patients immediately after MDO, and at 6 months postoperatively, 1 patient remained on continuous positive airway pressure and 1 patient required supplemental oxygen. At last follow up, no patients had significant residual airway obstruction or required a tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can effectively treat severe TBAO in some patients without micrognathia that would otherwise be candidates for tracheostomy. When used in select patients, MDO significantly improves obstructive sleep apnea and reduces need for ventilatory support, although feeding support is still needed in most patients at 6 months. Further study in a larger cohort will help identify appropriate candidates for MDO and characterize outcomes of unique patient populations.