"We want to be heard": Perspectives on mental health care among patients at a federally qualified health center.

Context: Depression is a debilitating condition associated with significant medical, social, and economic costs for individuals and communities. Despite its widespread prevalence, depression is typically under-identified and under-treated, particularly for people of color and lower socioeconomic status. Primary care settings such as federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) offer an ideal opportunity to rectify this gap for underserved communities. Objective: From 2020-2021, we conducted a phone-based, qualitative assessment to understand what factors hindered and helped patients diagnosed with depression at a FQHC in receiving needed mental healthcare. Study Design: Qualitative study employing inductive (i.e., grounded theory) and deductive techniques to identify core themes. Setting: Patients of a single FQHC in Minneapolis with major depressive disorder or dysthymia (per ICD-10 diagnosis) were included. Patients with other mood disorders or receiving palliative care were excluded. Population Studied: 906 FQHC patients were eligible in the overall sample, and a purposive sampling approach was used to interview 34 patients with diverse functional status, race/ethnicity, and insurance status. The analytic sample was majority non-White (32% Black, 24% Latinx, 15% Other), 20% Spanish-speaking, and 60% publicly insured. Results: Interviews revealed multiple barriers (factors that impeded access) and facilitators (factors that enabled access) to the uptake of mental healthcare that patients encountered, from first presentation for care, initial depression diagnosis, all the way through to remission of depression symptoms. Salient barriers included feeling dismissed by providers, cost concerns, internal and external communication breakdowns, gaps in provider continuity, the patient portal, and perceptions of mental health among certain sub-populations (e.g., Black community). Salient facilitators included the clinic organization's, staff friendliness and warmth, strategies to provide care in light of patients' financial situation, existing provider relationships for physical health needs, language concordance, the option for telehealth visits, and the clinic's overall social mission. Conclusion: The identified factors cast light on opportunities at multiple levels for community-based outpatient clinics to better support patients with mental health needs, and ultimately narrow persistent gaps in access.

An Exploration of Methods for Rating Children's Productions of Sibilant Fricatives.

This paper examines three methods for providing ratings of within-category detail in children's productions of /s/ and /ʃ/. A group of listeners (n=61) participated in a rating task in which a forced-choice phoneme identification task was followed by one of three measures of phoneme goodness: visual analog scaling, direct magnitude estimation, or a Likert scale judgment. All three types of ratings were similarly correlated with sounds' acoustic characteristics. Visual analog scaling and Likert scale judgments had higher intra-rater reliability than did direct magnitude estimation. Moreover, both of them elicited a wider range of judgments than did direct magnitude estimation. Based on our evaluation, Likert scale judgments and visual analog scaling are equally useful tasks for eliciting within-category judgments. Of these two, visual analog scaling may be preferable because it allows for more distinct levels of response.

Ruptured subcapsular liver hematoma in pregnancy: a case report of nonsurgical management.

Ruptured subcapsular liver hematoma in pregnancy is a rare condition that is usually managed surgically. Recently, however, surgical and obstetric literature has discussed conservative management. We describe successful conservative management of ruptured subcapsular liver hematoma in a woman with preeclampsia who had hemoperitoneum seen at cesarean section.