Understanding experiences of cognitive decline and cognitive assessment from the perspectives of people with glioma and their caregivers: A qualitative interview study.

Background: Despite the impact of cognitive decline during brain cancer care, implementing routine cognitive assessment can be challenging. Effective implementation of cognitive assessment necessitates an understanding of implementation from the patient perspective. However, little is known about how people with glioma and their caregivers experience cognitive changes, assessment and support. Objective: To understand the lived experiences of changes in cognition for people with glioma and their caregivers including experiences of: i) perceived or objectively measured cognitive decline (or absence of decline); ii) cognitive assessment following diagnosis, and; iii) met and unmet cognition-related supportive care needs. Design: Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with people with gliomas and support persons and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Settings: Two Australian cancer services. Participants: 18 people with glioma and caregivers. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with people with gliomas and caregivers and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: People with glioma (n = 5) and caregivers (n = 13) completed interviews. Four themes were identified: Cognition needs to be considered within the context of glioma diagnosis and treatment; concerns about cognition were initially subordinate to survival but become important; there are challenges identifying and communicating about people with gliomas' changes in cognition; cognition-related supportive care can be helpful but challenging for people with glioma and caregivers to identify and access. Conclusions: Changes to cognition can have considerable impacts of people with glioma and their caregivers which may be overshadowed by treatment and survival. A multi-disciplinary approach to timely cognitive screening, structured referral pathways, and communication with caregivers may provide opportunities for support. Registration: n/a. Tweetable abstract: Identifying cognitive changes in people with glioma is important and challenging. A multidisciplinary approach and inclusion of care coordination and caregivers can help.

Thyroid cancer patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice: analysing acceptability and optimizing recruitment.

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) can provide valuable metrics in clinical trials and cancer registries. To ensure relevance, patient participation must be optimized and PROMs be highly acceptable to patients. There are few data reporting methods to maximize recruitment and a lack of consensus regarding appropriate PROMs for thyroid cancer survivors. METHODS: All patients with a new diagnosis of thyroid (excluding micropapillary and anaplastic) cancer within a single Australian health district between January 2020 and December 2021 were invited to complete PROMs electronically, and self-report ease of use and comprehensiveness of each tool. Participants completed Short Form-12 (SF-12), European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC-QLQ-C30), City of Hope Quality of Life-Thyroid Version (COH-TV) and Thyroid Cancer Quality of Life Survey (ThyCaQoL). Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews explored patient priorities. An enhanced, multimodal recruitment strategy was instituted after 12 months due to low response rates. RESULTS: Survey completion improved under enhanced recruitment (37/62, 60% versus 19/64, 30%, P = 0.0007) with no differences in demographic or clinical characteristics. Few (4%-7%) respondents rated surveys as difficult to complete. No single PROM comprehensively captured health-related quality of life, with disease-specific tools performing marginally better (54% ThyCaQoL and 52% CoH-TV) compared to generic tools (38% SF-12 and 42% EOROTC-QLQ-C30). Qualitative data suggested that concurrent diagnoses, and survey invitation prior to surgery, made surveys more difficult to complete. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive and representative assessment of PROMs in thyroid cancer survivors requires the use of multiple survey tools and specialized staff to maximize recruitment.

Hearing the Voices of Australian Thyroid Cancer Survivors: Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Semistructured Interviews Identifies Unmet Support Needs.

Background: Most thyroid cancer survivors regain their physical health-related quality of life, but psychological and social deficits persist. The nature of these detriments remains poorly understood and they are insufficiently captured by survey data alone. To address this, qualitative data exploring the breadth and depth of thyroid cancer survivors' experiences and priorities for supportive care are required. Methods: Twenty semistructured interviews were undertaken with a purposive, maximum variation sample of thyroid cancer survivors. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded independently by two researchers. A hybrid model of inductive and realistic codebook analysis was undertaken with themes developed. Results: Patient experiences centered around three themes: (1) impact of diagnosis and treatment, (2) thyroid cancer does not happen in isolation, and (3) role of clinicians and formalized support structures. The word "cancer" had negative connotations, but for many, the reality of their experience was more positive. Despite feeling "lucky" at the relative low-risk nature of thyroid cancer, many patients reported fatigue, weight gain, and difficulty returning to usual activities; concerns that were largely dismissed or minimized by clinicians. Few were offered any support beyond their treating doctors; where patients attempted to access formalized supportive care, little was available or appropriate. Life stage and concurrent family and social stressors greatly impacted patients' ability to cope with diagnosis and treatment. Addressing thyroid cancer in isolation felt inappropriate without appreciating the broader context of their lives. Interactions with clinicians were largely positive, particularly where information was communicated as a means of empowering patients to participate in shared decision-making and where clinicians "checked in" emotionally with patients. Information about initial treatments was largely adequate but information on longer term effects and follow-up was lacking. Many patients felt that clinicians focused on physical well-being and scan results, missing opportunities to provide psychological support. Conclusions: Thyroid cancer survivors can struggle to navigate their cancer journey, particularly with regard to psychological and social functioning. There is a need to acknowledge these impacts at the time of clinical encounters, as well as develop information resources and support structures that can be individualized to optimize holistic well-being for those in need.

Acceptability and feasibility of cognitive assessments with adults with primary brain cancer and brain metastasis: A systematic review.

Routine cognitive assessment for adults with brain cancers is seldom completed but vital for guiding daily living, maintaining quality of life, or supporting patients and families. This study aims to identify cognitive assessments which are pragmatic and acceptable for use in clinical settings. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched to identify studies published in English between 1990 and 2021. Publications were independently screened by two coders and included if they: (1) were peer-reviewed; (2) reported original data relating to adult primary brain tumor or brain metastases; (3) used objective or subjective assessments; (4) reported assessment acceptability or feasibility. The Psychometric And Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale was used. Consent, assessment commencement and completion, and study completion were extracted along with author-reported acceptability and feasibility data. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42021234794. Across 27 studies, 21 cognitive assessments had been assessed for feasibility and acceptability; 15 were objective assessments. Acceptability data were limited and heterogeneous, particularly consent (not reported in 23 studies), assessment commencement (not reported in 19 studies), and assessment completion (not reported in 21 studies). Reasons for non-completion could be grouped into patient-factors, assessment-factors, clinician-factors, and system-factors. The three cognitive assessments with the most acceptability and feasibility data reported were the MMSE, MoCA, and NIHTB-CB. Further acceptability and feasibility data are needed including consent, commencement and completion rates. Cost, length, time, and assessor burden are needed for the MMSE, MoCA, and NIHTB-CB, along with potentially new computerized assessments suited for busy clinical settings.

The dynamic relationship between cancer and employment-related financial toxicity: an in-depth qualitative study of 21 Australian cancer survivor experiences and preferences for support.

BACKGROUND: People with a cancer diagnosis experience physical and emotional impacts that may affect employment. Alongside cancer care costs, reduced ability to generate an income is a key contributor to financial toxicity which is associated with poor emotional wellbeing, quality of life, treatment adherence and survival. This study aimed to explore people's experiences of changes to employment and their suggestions for how cancer survivors can be better supported. METHODS: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 cancer survivors identified as part of a larger study of emotional distress. Purposive sampling was used to include a diverse group of people across age, gender, tumour type, self-reported financial difficulties and employment status. Interviews were inductively and iteratively coded by two independent coders and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There is a dynamic relationship between a person's cancer treatment and their employment. For some, employment was disrupted due to physical or emotional impacts of cancer, or workplace stigma and discrimination. Others continued to work at the detriment of their health. Participants wished they had been made aware earlier how cancer might impact their capacity to work, their finances and their health. There was a lack of knowledge on the financial supports that may be available to them. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals may have a role in minimising the financial impact of a cancer diagnosis through early assessment, communication of patients' potential work capacity and appropriate referrals to occupational therapy to aid return to work or financial planning. A robust government social support system specifically for households experiencing cancer is urgently required.

A qualitative study investigating Australian cancer service outpatients' experience of distress screening and management: what is the personal relevance, acceptability and improvement opportunities from patient perspectives?

PURPOSE: People diagnosed with cancer experience high distress levels throughout diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. Untreated distress is associated with poor outcomes, including worsened quality of life and higher mortality rates. Distress screening facilitates need-based access to supportive care which can optimize patient outcomes. This qualitative interview study explored outpatients' perceptions of a distress screening process implemented in an Australian cancer center. METHODS: Adult, English-speaking cancer outpatients were approached to participate in face-to-face or phone interviews after being screened by a clinic nurse using the distress thermometer (DT). The piloted semi-structured interview guide explored perceptions of the distress screening and management process, overall well-being, psychosocial support networks, and improvement opportunities for distress processes. Thematic analysis was used. RESULTS: Four key themes were identified in the 19 interviews conducted. Distress screening was found to be generally acceptable to participants and could be conducted by a variety of health professionals at varied time points. However, some participants found "distress" to be an ambiguous term. Despite many participants experiencing clinical distress (i.e., DT ≥ 4), few actioned referrals; some noted a preference to manage and prevent distress through informal support and well-being activities. Participants' diverse coping styles, such as positivity, acceptance, and distancing, also factored into the perceived value of screening and referrals. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Screening models only measuring severity of distress may not be sufficient to direct care referrals, as they do not consider patients' varying coping strategies, external support networks, understanding of distress terminology, and motivations for accessing supportive care services.

Psychometric properties of leadership scales for health professionals: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The important role of leaders in the translation of health research is acknowledged in the implementation science literature. However, the accurate measurement of leadership traits and behaviours in health professionals has not been directly addressed. This review aimed to identify whether scales which measure leadership traits and behaviours have been found to be reliable and valid for use with health professionals. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, ABI/INFORMIT and Business Source Ultimate were searched to identify publications which reported original research testing the reliability, validity or acceptability of a leadership-related scale with health professionals. RESULTS: Of 2814 records, a total of 39 studies met the inclusion criteria, from which 33 scales were identified as having undergone some form of psychometric testing with health professionals. The most commonly used was the Implementation Leadership Scale (n = 5) and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (n = 3). Of the 33 scales, the majority of scales were validated in English speaking countries including the USA (n = 15) and Canada (n = 4), but also with some translations and use in Europe and Asia, predominantly with samples of nurses (n = 27) or allied health professionals (n = 10). Only two validation studies included physicians. Content validity and internal consistency were evident for most scales (n = 30 and 29, respectively). Only 20 of the 33 scales were found to satisfy the acceptable thresholds for good construct validity. Very limited testing occurred in relation to test-re-test reliability, responsiveness, acceptability, cross-cultural revalidation, convergent validity, discriminant validity and criterion validity. CONCLUSIONS: Seven scales may be sufficiently sound to be used with professionals, primarily with nurses. There is an absence of validation of leadership scales with regard to physicians. Given that physicians, along with nurses and allied health professionals have a leadership role in driving the implementation of evidence-based healthcare, this constitutes a clear gap in the psychometric testing of leadership scales for use in healthcare implementation research and practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (see Additional File 1) (PLoS Medicine. 6:e1000097, 2009) and the associated protocol has been registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Registration Number CRD42019121544 ).