Nocturnal hypoxia indexes are associated with left ventricular remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with heart derangements detected at echocardiography as higher left ventricular mass index (LVMI), higher left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and impaired diastolic function. However, the currently used parameter to define OSA diagnosis and severity, the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), poorly predicts cardiovascular damage, cardiovascular events, and mortality. Our study aimed to assess if other polygraphic indices of OSA presence and severity, in addition to AHI, might better predict echocardiographic cardiac remodeling. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled two cohorts of individuals referred for suspected OSA to the outpatient facilities of the IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milano, and of the Clinica Medica 3, Padova. All patients underwent home sleep apnea testing and echocardiography. Based on the AHI the cohort was divided into no-OSA (AHI<15 events/hour) and moderate-severe OSA (AHI≥15 events/hour). We recruited 162 patients and found that compared to patients with no-OSA, those with moderate-severe OSA showed higher LV remodeling [left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) 48.4 ± 11.5 ml/m2 vs. 54.1 ± 14.0 ml/m2, respectively, p = 0.005] and lower LVEF (65.3 ± 5.8% vs. 61.6 ± 7.8%, respectively, p = 0.002), whereas we could not find any difference in LVMI and early and late ventricular filling velocity ratio (E/A). At multivariate linear regression analysis two polygraphic hypoxic burden-related markers were independent predictors of LVEDV and E/A, i.e., the percentage of time with O2 saturation below 90% (ß = 0.222) and ODI (ß = -0.422), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that nocturnal hypoxia-related indexes were associated with left ventricular remodeling and diastolic dysfunction in OSA patients.

Chest X-ray Does Not Predict the Risk of Endotracheal Intubation and Escalation of Treatment in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Noninvasive Respiratory Support.

Forms of noninvasive respiratory support (NIRS) have been widely used to avoid endotracheal intubation in patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19). However, inappropriate prolongation of NIRS may delay endotracheal intubation and worsen patient outcomes. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess whether the CARE score, a chest X-ray score previously validated in COVID-19 patients, may predict the need for endotracheal intubation and escalation of respiratory support in COVID-19 patients requiring NIRS. From December 2020 to May 2021, we included 142 patients receiving NIRS who had a first chest X-ray available at NIRS initiation and a second one after 48-72 h. In 94 (66%) patients, the level of respiratory support was increased, while endotracheal intubation was required in 83 (58%) patients. The CARE score at NIRS initiation was not predictive of the need for endotracheal intubation (odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.06) or escalation of treatment (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.07). In conclusion, chest X-ray severity, as assessed by the CARE score, did not allow predicting endotracheal intubation or escalation of respiratory support in COVID-19 patients undergoing NIRS.