The effect of mechanical bowel preparation on postoperative complications in laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess whether full bowel preparation affects 30-day surgical outcomes in laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all elective laparoscopic right colectomies performed for colonic adenocarcinoma between Jan 2011 and Dec 2021. The cohort was divided into two groups-no bowel preparation (NP) group and patients who received full bowel preparation (FP), including oral and mechanical cathartic bowel preparation. All anastomoses were extracorporeal stapled side-to-side. The two groups were compared at baseline and then were matched using propensity score based on demographic and clinical parameters. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative complication rate, mainly anastomotic leak (AL) and surgical site infection (SSI) rate. RESULTS: The original cohort included 238 patients with a median age of 68 (SD 13) and equal M:F ratio. Following propensity score matching, 93 matched patients were included in each group. Analysis of the matched cohort showed a significantly higher overall complication rate in the FP group (28 vs 11.8%, p = 0.005) which was mostly due to minor type II complications. There were no differences in major complication rates, SSI, ileus, or AL rate. Although operative time was significantly longer in the FP group (119 vs 100 min, p ≤ 0.001), length of stay was significantly shorter in the FP group (5 vs 6 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Aside from a shorter hospital stay, full mechanical bowel preparation for laparoscopic right colectomy does not seem to have any benefit and may be associated with a higher overall complication rate.

Enhanced Recovery Deviation and Failure After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Causative Factors and Impact.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is popular and safe. This study aimed to describe the incidence, causative factors, and clinical impact of deviation from and failure of an ERAS protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort analysis of elective PD patients managed according to an ERAS protocol between October 2015 and June 2018 was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified variables associated with protocol deviation and failure. The relationship between protocol deviation and failure was also explored. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were identified comprising of 46 females and 51 males. The median age was 68 y (range 17-85). Twenty-one patients (21.6%) suffered serious complications, whereas two (2.1%) died perioperatively. The median length of stay (LoS) was 14 d (6-36). In total, 73 (75.3%) patients deviated, whereas 39 (40.2%) failed the protocol. On univariate analysis, protocol deviation was associated with male gender, surgery time ≥270 min, and prolonged LoS. On multivariate analysis only prolonged LoS remained significant. Only serious complications were associated with protocol failure on multivariate analysis. Protocol deviation was not associated with significant complications nor ERAS protocol failure. CONCLUSIONS: ERAS protocol deviation does not alter the course of those destined to protocol failure. Greater understanding into the causative factors of either protocol deviation or failure may be the only way to personalize care and realize the maximal benefit of ERAS in this specific group of patients.