Is limited aortic resection more justified in elderly patients with type A acute aortic dissection?-insights from single center experience.

BACKGROUND: This study compared limited aortic repair (ascending, and /or hemi-arch replacement) versus extended-arch repair (ascending, arch and proximal descending aortic replacement) used for patients aged 65 or older, who had type A acute aortic dissection (AAD), analyzing the influence of the extent of aortic repair on outcomes. METHODS: From January, 2001 to December, 2015, 103 patients aged 65 or older underwent operation due to type A AAD in Nanjing First Hospital. The cohort was divided into two subgroups according to the surgical approaches, including limited aortic replacement (LAR, n = 41) and total arch replacement + stent elephant trunk implantation (TAR+SET, n = 62). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in gender, age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, PCI history, atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, aortic valve insufficiency (≥ moderate), shock situation before operation, and Euro-score II between the two groups except limb malperfusion and tear location. The cross-clamp time, CPB time, intubation time, ICU stay time and hospital time were all significantly less in the LAR group than in the TAR+SET group. A total of 89 patients were discharged home successfully after operation, with a difference of hospital mortality (P = 0.04). The overall survival rates at 5-year follow-up were 82.5 ± 6.0% in LAR group and 75.2 ± 5.6% in TAR+SET group, but with no difference (p = 0.151). The freedom from adverse aortic events at 5-year was 84.3 ± 6.5% in LAR group versus 97.9 ± 2.1% in TAR+SET group, with a statistical difference (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: These findings support limited aortic resection is acceptable for elderly patients with type A AAD if surgical principles allow.

Risk factors for early death in primary malignant cardiac tumors: An analysis of over 40 years and 500 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate risk factors contributing to early death in patients diagnosed with primary malignant cardiac tumors (PMCTs) and derive better understanding of these poorly characterized individuals. METHOD: Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) registries on 564 patients diagnosed with PMCTs between 1973 and 2014 were analyzed. Early death was defined as survival of ≤3 months from the time of diagnosis. Two-tailed χ2 or fisher's exact test were used for association between categorical variables and occurrence of early death. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent risk factors of early death. Time trends in early death rates of PMCTs were described using scatter plot. RESULTS: Of the 564 patients with PMCTs, early death was identified in 214 individuals (37.9%). Patients with unspecified soft tissue sarcomas and blood vessel tumors had the highest risk of early death. Age > 80 years and non-consent for surgery were strong predictors of early death in all PMCT subtypes. In sarcomas, disadvantaged income was associated with an increase in early mortality, while black race was associated with a reduction in early mortality. In mesotheliomas and others, male sex was a risk factor for early mortality, while Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a reduction in early mortality. Percentages of early death slightly decreased over the past 40 years. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of early death are primarily related to age older than 80 years, no surgery and specific histopathology types but also include disadvantaged socioeconomic status and male sex. Initiatives to identify those at risk and develop preventive interventions should be prioritized.