Effect of Hepatic Preconditioning with the Use of Methylene Blue on the Liver of Wistar Rats Submitted to Ischemia and Reperfusion.

BACKGROUND: The liver may be injured in situations where it is submitted to ischemia, such as partial hepatectomy and liver transplantation. In all cases, ischemia is followed by reperfusion and, although it is essential for the reestablishment of tissue function, reperfusion may cause greater damage than ischemia, an injury characterized as ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) damage. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of ischemic preconditioning with the use of methylene blue (MB; 15 mg/kg) 5 or 15 minutes before I/R (IRMB5' and IRMB15', respectively) on the hepatic injury occurring after I/R. METHODS: Twenty-eight male Wistar rats were used, and liver samples submitted to partial ischemia (IR) or not (NI) were obtained from the same animal. The samples were divided into 7 groups. Data were analyzed statistically by means of the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon Matched test, with the level of significance set at 5% (P < .05). RESULTS: The rate of oxygen consumption by state 3 mitochondria was inhibited in all ischemic groups compared with the sham group (SH vs IR: P = .0052; SH vs IRMB5': P = .0006; SH vs IRMB15': P = .0048), which did not occur in the nonischemic contralateral portion of the same liver (SH vs NI: P = .7652; SH vs NIMB5': P = .059; SH vs NIMB15': P = .3153). The inhibition of the rate of oxygen consumption by state 3 mitochondria was maintained in the presence of MB (IR vs IRMB5': P = .4563; IR vs IRMB15': P = .9021). The respiratory control ratio was reduced in all ischemic groups compared with the sham group, owing to the inhibition of oxygen consumption in state 3 (SH vs IR: P = .0151; SH vs IRMB5': P = .005; SH vs IRMB15': P = .0007). CONCLUSIONS: Methylene blue had no effect on the mitochondrial respiratory parameters studied, but was able to reduce lipid peroxidation, preventing the production of reactive oxygen species (SH vs IRMB15': P = .0210).

Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and associated liver metastases: a systematic review.

As many as 25 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have liver metastases at presentation. However, the optimal strategy for resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastasis remains controversial. Despite the increasing use of laparoscopy in colorectal and liver resections, combined laparoscopic resection of the primary CRC and synchronous liver metastasis is rarely performed. The potential benefits of this approach are the possibility to perform a radical operation with small incisions, earlier recovery, and reduction in costs. The aim of this study was to review the literature on feasibility and short-term results of simultaneous laparoscopic resection. We conducted a systematic search of all articles published until February 2013. Search terms included: hepatectomy [Mesh], "liver resection," laparoscopy [Mesh], hand-assisted laparoscopy [Mesh], surgical procedures, minimally invasive [Mesh], colectomy [Mesh], colorectal neoplasms [Mesh], and "colorectal resections." No randomized trials are available. All data have been reported as case reports, case series, or case-control studies. Thirty-nine minimally invasive simultaneous resections were identified in 14 different articles. There were 9 (23 %) major hepatic resections. The most performed liver resection was left lateral sectionectomy in 26 (67 %) patients. Colorectal resections included low rectal resections with total mesorectal excision, right and left hemicolectomies, and anterior resections. Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, the laparoscopic combined procedure appeared to be feasible and safe, even with major hepatectomies. Good patient selection and refined surgical technique are the keys to successful simultaneous resection. Simultaneous left lateral sectionectomy associated with colorectal resection should be routinely proposed.