A 10-year analysis of 214 HEMS backcountry hoist rescues.

BACKGROUND: Few published studies on civilian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) hoist programs exist. This study provides a demographic analysis of hoist rescue operations performed by the only FAA Part 135 hoist-approved civilian HEMS operator in the United States. METHODS: All persons hoisted between May 29, 2001, and May 28, 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, 212 of 214 victims were hoisted. The most common indications were fall injuries (38%) and being stranded (21%). Victim demographics showed an average age of 35 ± 17years, predominantly male (79%), often associated with trauma (66%), with a majority (68%) of all victims requiring subsequent transport to a hospital by ground ambulance (24%) or flown by Life Flight (44%). Hoists occurred most often in the afternoon (14:07 ± 3:47 hours), during the weekend (53%), in the months of May-September (71%), at an altitude of 7,488 ± 1487 feet, with the seat harness (39%) being the most common mode of victim extraction. Hoist insertion of search and rescue (SAR) personnel occurred infrequently (5%). CONCLUSION: The results from this demographic study on hoist operations can provide important demographic information for HEMS contemplating backcountry hoist operations and programs that interface with SAR agencies.

Difficult airway simulator intubation success rates using Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport systems training standards.

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate difficult airway simulator intubation success rates using Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems (CAMTS) initial and maintenance intubation training standards on transport-RN novice intubators over a 1-year period. METHODS: Twelve transport nurses were blinded to and randomly assigned five or six of 64 different difficult airway simulator scenarios. Intubation success rates were measured 1 month before training, 1 month after training, and 1 year later, following CAMTS initial and maintenance intubation standards. Outcome measurements included first attempt intubation rate, overall intubation success rate, number of attempts to intubation, time per attempt, time to intubation, and time between attempts. During the study, participants received no additional training or opportunities to intubate. RESULTS: First-attempt intubation rates significantly improved (P 5 .022) from 19% 1 month before training to 36% 1 month after training, but did not significantly change (P > .999) 1 year later following CAMTS maintenance standards (34%). Mean cumulative success rates did not significantly improve after four attempts or after 3.5 minutes. The overall mean time per attempt and time between attempts declined with subsequent intubation attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Using initial and maintenance CAMTS standards, simulator difficult airway intubation success rates are low in novice intubators. Our results suggest that one intubation/quarter may be enough to maintain difficult airway intubation success rates. Training significantly improves intubation rates. Little advantage occurs in intubation rates after four attempts or 3.5 minutes.

Air medical transport personnel experiences with and opinions about research.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined air medical transport (AMT) personnel's experiences with and opinions about prehospital and AMT research. METHODS: A Web-based questionnaire was sent to eight randomly selected AMT programs from each of six Association of Air Medical Services (AAMS) regions. Responders were defined by university association (UA) and AMT professional role. RESULTS: Forty-eight of 54 (89%) contacted programs and 536 of 1,282 (42%) individuals responded. Non-UA responders (74%) had significantly more work experience in emergency medical services (EMS) (13.5 +/- 8.5 vs. 10.8 +/- 8.3 years, P = .002) and AMT (8.3 +/- 6.3 vs. 6.8 +/- 5.7 years, P = .008), whereas UA responders (26%) had more research training (51% vs. 37%, P = .006), experience (79% vs. 59%, P < .001), and grants (7% vs. 2%, P = .006). By AMT role, administrators had the most work experience, and physicians had the most research experience. Research productivity of responders was low, with only 9% having presented and 10% having published research; and UA made no difference in productivity. A majority of responders advocated research: EMS (66%) and AMT (68%), program (53%). Willingness to participate in research was high for both EMS research (87%) and AMT research (92%). CONCLUSIONS: Although AMT personnel were strong advocates of and willing to participate in research, few had research knowledge. For AMT personnel, disparity exists between advocating for and producing research.

The usefulness of design of experimentation in defining the effect difficult airway factors and training have on simulator oral-tracheal intubation success rates in novice intubators.

OBJECTIVES: This exploratory study examined novice intubators and the effect difficult airway factors have on pre- and posttraining oral-tracheal simulation intubation success rates. METHODS: Using a two-level, full-factorial design of experimentation (DOE) involving a combination of six airway factors (curved vs. straight laryngoscope blade, trismus, tongue edema, laryngeal spasm, pharyngeal obstruction, or cervical immobilization), 64 airway scenarios were prospectively randomized to 12 critical care nurses to evaluate pre- and posttraining first-pass intubation success rates on a simulator. Scenario variables and intubation outcomes were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed-effects model to determine two-way main and interactive effects. RESULTS: Interactive effects between the six study factors were nonsignificant (p = 0.69). For both pre- and posttraining, main effects showed the straight blade (p = 0.006), tongue edema (p = 0.0001), and laryngeal spasm (p = 0.004) significantly reduced success rates, while trismus (p = 0.358), pharyngeal obstruction (p = 0.078), and cervical immobilization did not significantly change the success rate. First-pass intubation success rate on the simulator significantly improved (p = 0.005) from pre- (19%) to posttraining (36%). CONCLUSIONS: Design of experimentation is useful in analyzing the effect difficult airway factors and training have on simulator intubation success rates. Future quality improvement DOE simulator research studies should be performed to help clarify the relationship between simulator factors and patient intubation rates.

Sleep and cognitive performance of flight nurses after 12-hour evening versus 18-hour shifts.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate rest can result in disastrous medical and aviation errors. Using a prospective within-subjects design, this study compared the amount of daily sleep and the cognitive performance in flight nurses working 12-hour evening versus 18-hour shifts during a 72-hour duty schedule. METHODS: Ten flight nurses who worked two different duty schedules participated in the study. The first duty schedule consisted of three back-to-back 12-hour (7:00 pm to 7:00 am) evening shifts. The second duty schedule consisted of two 18-hour (7:00 am to 1:00 am) shifts separated by a 24-hour rest period. Pre- and duty sleep times were monitored using actigraphy. The flight nurses were tested using a battery of neuropsychological tests before and immediately after completing 12- and 18-hour duty schedules. After the conclusion of both duty schedules, nurses were asked to rate the 12- versus 18-hour duty schedules via questionnaire. RESULTS: Daily sleep times for the 12- versus 18-hour were not different for the pre-duty schedule (8.9 +/- 2.3 vs. 9.0 +/- 2.3 hours) or during duty schedule (7.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 6.9 +/- 1.3 hours). A significant decline was seen in the amount of pre- versus duty sleep for both the 12-hour (8.9 +/- 2.3 vs. 7.0 +/- 1.4 hours; P < .05) and the 18-hour (9.0 +/- 2.3 vs. 6.9 +/- 1.3 hours; P = .04) duty schedules. During the 72-hour duty schedule, the 12-hour vs. 18-hour duty schedules, the nurses had less pre-shift sleep (3.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 6.2 +/- 0.6; P = .001) and more on-shift (4.4 +/- 1.7 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.8; P = .002) sleep. Despite the decline in daily sleep during both duty schedules, no significant decline in the before versus after cognitive test scores were observed for either the 12- or 18-hour duty schedule. A questionnaire given to the 10 nurses indicated that the 18-hour duty schedule was more compatible with their non-work lifestyle (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Provided adequate daily sleep (at least 7 hours/day) is obtained, we found no difference or decline in the cognitive function of flight nurses working either a 12-hour evening or 18-hour shift during a 72-hour duty schedule. Eighteen-hour duty shifts may be a practical economical means of expanding the period of helicopter site coverage without adversely affecting cognitive performance in medical crewmembers. Actigraphy may be a useful tool for air medical programs that want to objectively assess whether adequate sleep is occurring in individuals working extended (>12 hours) or unusual duty shifts.