RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pain in the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is very common, yet the underlying etiology remains unknown. Previous clinical research and biomechanical research has implicated stenosing flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendonitis as a possible cause. The hypothesis of this study was that treatment solely focusing on alleviating restricted FHL excursion would be beneficial in patients with hallux MTPJ pain. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of those treated in the Foot & Ankle Division between January 2009, and December 2018, who were diagnosed with FHL tendonitis with associated pain in the hallux MTPJ. Demographics, comorbidities, examination findings, imaging results, pain scores, treatment instituted, and outcome was obtained from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the improvement in the pain score (visual analog scale [VAS]). The surgical patients were included if their procedure was solely related to the FHL (posteromedial ankle release ± os trigonum resection). The decision to have surgery was analyzed by univariate and multivariable statistics using demographics, comorbidities, and clinical findings as potential factors (P < .05). RESULTS: In 75% (59 of 79 feet), nonoperative treatment of FHL stenosis resulted in a decrease in pain scores that the patients felt was satisfactory. The operative group that had an FHL release showed decreased pain in 90% (18 of 20 feet). Multivariable analysis identified the need for immobilization (OR 9.8, 95% CI 1.8-55.2, P = .009), participating in athletics (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.8-42.2, P = .007), and higher initial VAS (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.3, P < .001) as being associated with the decision for surgery. CONCLUSION: Previous biomechanical studies have suggested that stenosing FHL synovitis can cause increased intraarticular loading in the hallux MTPJ. The current clinical study supports this hypothesis, demonstrating that treatment focused on relieving restricted FHL excursion can ameliorate pain in the hallux MTPJ in select cases.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the feasibility of integrating palliative care consultation into the routine management of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Additionally, we sought to describe patient-reported outcomes from the palliative care and vascular literature in patients with CLTI receiving a palliative care consultation at our institution. METHODS: This was a single-institution, prospective, observational study that aimed to assess feasibility of incorporating palliative care consultation into the management of patients admitted to our tertiary academic medical center with CLTI by looking at utilization of palliative care before and after implementation of a protocol-based palliative care referral system. A survey comprised of patient-reported outcomes from the palliative care literature was administered to patients before and after palliative consultation. Length of stay and mortality were compared between our study cohort and a historic cohort of patients admitted with CLTI. RESULTS: Over a 14-month enrollment period, 44% of patients (n = 39) with CLTI (rest pain, 36%; tissue loss, 64%) admitted to the vascular service received palliative care consultation, compared with 5% of patients (n = 4) who would have met criteria over the preceding 14 months before our protocol was instituted. The mean age was 69 years, 23% were female, 92% were white, and 49% were able to ambulate independently. Revascularization included bypass (46%), peripheral vascular intervention (23%), and femoral endarterectomy (21%). Additional procedures included minor amputation or wound debridement (26%) and major amputation (15%). No patients received medical management alone. After receiving palliative care consultation, patients reported experiencing less emotional distress than before consultation (P = .03). They also reported being less bothered by uncertainty regarding what to expect from the course of their illness (P = .002). Fewer patients reported being unsure of the purpose of their medical care after palliative care consultation (8%) vs before (18%), although this was not statistically significant (P = .10). Median length of stay was longer in the study group compared with the historic cohort (8 vs 7 days; P = .02). There was no difference in 30-day mortality (3% vs 8%; P = .42) between the study group and the historic cohort (n = 77). CONCLUSIONS: Integrating inpatient palliative care consultation into the routine management of patients with CLTI is feasible and may improve emotional domains of health-related quality of life. This study laid the foundation for future studies on longer term outcomes of patients with CLTI undergoing palliative care consultation as well as the benefit of outpatient palliative care consultation in patients with CLTI.