Impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) confers a variety of metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors on GIP levels in T2DM patients. Methods: Medline (PubMed), CENTER (Cochrane Library), and Embase (Ovid) were searched and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels were obtained. For postprandial GIP, only studies with the data of GIP changes reported as the total area under the curve (AUCGIP) using a meal or oral glucose tolerance test were included. A random-effects model was used for data pooling after incorporating heterogeneity. Results: Overall, 14 RCTs with 541 T2DM patients were included. Compared to placebo/no treatment, the use of DPP4 inhibitors significantly increased the fasting GIP level (standard mean difference [SMD]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-1.05, P<0.001; I2 = 52%) and postprandial AUCGIP (SMD: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02-1.64, P<0.001; I2 = 65%). Influence analysis by excluding one dataset at a time showed consistent results. Sensitivity analyses only including studies with radioimmunoassay showed also consistent results (fasting GIP: SMD: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.51-1.00, P<0.001; I2 = 0%; and postprandial AUCGIP: SMD: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18-1.78, P<0.001; I2 = 54%). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated that the influence of DPP4 inhibitors on fasting and postprandial GIP levels in T2DM patients was not significantly changed by study characteristics such as study design, patient mean age, baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration, body mass index (BMI), background treatment, treatment duration, or method for postprandial GIP measurement (all P for subgroup effects <0.05). Conclusion: The use of DPP4 inhibitors effectively increases the fasting and postprandial GIP concentrations in T2DM patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022356716.

Effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on postprandial glucagon level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Hyperglucagonemia occurs in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this meta-analysis, we summarized the effects of DPP4 inhibitors on glucagon levels in patients with T2DM. Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the influence of DPP4 inhibitors on circulating glucagon levels with placebo or other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in patients with T2DM were identified by searches of Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and CENTER (Cochrane Library). Only studies reporting changes in glucagon level presented as total area under the curve (AUCglucagon) using a meal or oral glucose tolerance test were included. Results were combined using a random-effects model that incorporated potential heterogeneity among the included studies. Results: A total of 36 RCTs with moderate to high quality were included. Overall, the numbers of T2DM patients included for the meta-analyses comparing DPP4 inhibitors with placebo and other OADs were 4266 and 1652, respectively. Compared to placebo, DPP4 inhibitors significantly reduced circulating glucagon levels (standard mean difference [SMD]: -0.32, 95% CI: -0.40 to -0.24, P<0.001; I2 = 28%). Analysis of subgroups revealed that study characteristics had no significant effect on results, such as study design (parallel group or crossover), number of patients, mean patient age, proportion of men, baseline HbA1c, duration of diabetes, background therapy, treatment duration, or methods for glucagon measurement (all P for subgroup differences >0.05). Moreover, DPP4 inhibitors significantly reduced glucagon levels compared to other OADs (SMD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.16, P<0.001; I2 = 66%), and the reduction in glucagon was greater in comparison with insulin secretagogues than in comparison with non-insulin secretagogues (P for subgroup difference =0.03). Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202280104. Conclusions: DPP4 inhibitors are effective at reducing the circulating postprandial glucagon level in T2DM patients.

Influence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: The influence of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors on glycemic variability compared to other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), measured based on the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), has not been comprehensively analyzed. The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the effects of DPP4 inhibitors on MAGE with other OADs in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients without concurrent insulin treatments. Methods: The Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and CENTER (Cochrane Library) databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Study characteristics and outcome data were independently extracted by two authors. A random-effect model was used to combine the results. Results: Fourteen studies with 855 patients were included. Compared to other OADs, DPP4 inhibitors significantly reduced MAGE (mean difference [MD]: -0.69 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.95 to -0.43, P<0.001) with mild heterogeneity (I2 = 28%). Predefined subgroup analyses suggested that DPP4 inhibitors were more effective in reducing MAGE compared to insulin secretagogues (MD: -0.92 mmol/L, P<0.001) and non-secretagogues (MD: -0.43 mmol/L, P=0.02), as well as compared to sulfonylureas (MD: -0.91 mmol/L, P<0.001) and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (MD: -0.67 mmol/L, P=0.03). Conclusions: DPP4 inhibitors may significantly reduce glycemic variability compared to other oral anti-diabetic drugs, as evidenced by MAGE in T2DM patients with no concurrent insulin treatment. Systematic review registration: INPLASY, registration number: INPLASY2021120113.

Valine pyrrolidide preserves intact glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and improves abnormal glucose tolerance in minipigs with reduced beta-cell mass.

The incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important in blood glucose regulation. However, both incretin hormones are rapidly degraded by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV). The concept of DPPIV inhibition as a treatment for type 2 diabetes was evaluated in a new large animal model of insulin-deficient diabetes and reduced beta-cell mass, the nicotinamide (NIA) (67 mg/kg) and streptozotocin (STZ) (125 mg/kg)-treated minipig, using the DPPIV inhibitor, valine pyrrolidide (VP) (50 mg/kg). VP did not significantly affect levels of intact GLP-1 but increased levels of intact GIP (from 4543 +/- 1880 to 9208 +/- 3267 pM x min; P <.01), thus improving glucose tolerance (area under the curve [AUC] for glucose reduced from 1904 +/- 480 to 1582 +/- 353 mM x min; P =.05). VP did not increase insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) but increased the insulinogenic index in normal animals (from 83 +/- 42 to 192 +/- 108; P <.05), but not after NIA + STZ, possibly because of less residual insulin secretory capacity in these animals. GIP seems to contribute to the antihyperglycemic effect of VP in this model; however, additional mechanisms for the effect of DPPIV inhibition cannot be excluded. The authors conclude that DPPIV inhibitors may be useful to treat type 2 diabetes, even when this is due to reduced beta-cell mass.

High-fat high-energy feeding impairs fasting glucose and increases fasting insulin levels in the Göttingen minipig: results from a pilot study.

High-fat diet and obesity are known to be of major importance for development of type 2 diabetes in humans. High-fat feeding can induce syndromes of glucose intolerance and/or insulin resistance in several species, and the Göttingen minipig might be a useful model for studying the effect of dietary high-fat intake and obesity on glucose homeostasis and the susceptibility to diabetes. The present study was designed as a pilot study to investigate the effects of obesity caused by high-fat high-energy feeding on oral and intravenous glucose tolerance. Male Göttingen minipigs were fed a control diet (CD) or a high-fat high-energy diet (HFD) for 3 months. Body weight (32.6 +/- 2.4 kg vs. 24.9 +/- 0.5 kg, p < 0.001) and total (13.2 +/- 3.2% vs. 6.1 +/- 0.5%, p = 0.002) and truncal (11.0 +/- 3.9% vs. 1.8 +/- 1.1%, p = 0.001) fat percent were increased significantly, whereas relative lean body mass was decreased (84.8 +/- 3.3% vs. 91.9 +/- 0.5%, p = 0.002) in the HFD group compared to CD. Fasting plasma glucose (4.3 +/- 0.4 mM vs. 3.6 +/- 0.3 mM, p = 0.023) and insulin (80 +/- 23 pM vs. 23 +/- 21 pM, p = 0.012) were increased in the HFD group compared to CD, but oral glucose tolerance was not significantly changed. Insulin responses to intravenous glucose were increased (6741 +/- 2538 vs. 3938 +/- 771 pM 3 min, p = 0.050), while glucose clearance was not changed by HFD vs. CD, thus indicating insulin resistance. In conclusion, changes in body weight and composition, resulting in minor abnormalities in glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, characterized by slight hyperglycemia and compensatory hyperinsulinemia, can be induced in the male Göttingen minipig by high-fat high-energy feeding for 3 months. This approach seems to be an interesting and promising method for establishment of a nonrodent model of insulin resistance or type 2 diabetes.