Virtual reality and critical care education in nursing: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The nursing care of a critically ill patient in the intensive care unit requires specific training. Virtual reality can facilitate the nursing assessment of critically ill patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of virtual reality as a tool for teaching nursing assessment of critically ill patients. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. SETTING: University of the Balearic Islands (Spain) during the 2022 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: Third-year nursing students. METHODS: A specific environment was designed for virtual reality immersion using a BNEXT head-mounted display. Data were collected using three questionnaires: perception of self-efficacy regarding skill-acquisition in the nursing care process; immersivity; utility and tool satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 111 undergraduated nursing students responded, 86.8 % of whom had no previous intensive care units experience. They rated the virtual reality experience positively for learning the nursing care process, emphasising the need for skin and mucosal hygiene, patient mobilisation and family care, as well as an understanding of the therapeutic technology required. A total of 67.6 % felt as though they were physically present. They reported a high degree of acceptance and satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality has facilitated the exposure of students to an unfamiliar environment such as the intensive care units, proving to be useful, satisfying, and motivating in teaching the nursing care process.

Use of simulation to improve nursing students' medication administration competence: a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: Medication administration errors are among the most important adverse events in healthcare systems. To minimise the risk of this occurring, nursing training programmes should emphasise the overriding priority of patient safety. In this respect, simulation can be a valuable resource in teaching procedures, for patient safety in general and safe medication administration in particular. In this study, we evaluate the use of a simulation-based activity for students to acquire skills in safe medication administration, and consider the students' perceptions of this activity. METHODS: Second-year nursing students enrolled in the subject of pharmacology at a Spanish university during the academic year 2018-2019 were invited to participate in this mixed-method study. Their acquisition of professional competencies via a simulation exercise was evaluated according to the 'six rights'. Before the simulation, each student completed a researcher-developed online questionnaire. The simulation was evaluated by the students' tutor, using a checklist. A descriptive analysis was made of the data obtained from the questionnaire and during the simulation. At the end of the semester, the students' opinions were recorded in the questionnaire, in response to an open question. A content analysis was made of the responses to the open question. RESULTS: The simulation exercise was performed by 179 students, of whom 73 had previously completed the questionnaire. Analysis showed that, in comparison with the pre-simulation questionnaire results, compliance with the six rights improved in all dimensions except data documentation: right patient (from 64.4% to 83.3%); right medication (from 60.3% to 95.8%); right dose (from 60.3% to 100%); right route (from 54.8% to 95.8%); right time (from 24.7% to 70.8%); the right documentation result fell from 54.8% to 45.8%. The students expressed their satisfaction with the simulation method, affirming that it brought them closer to the reality of health care. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation is a useful tool for the acquisition of skills in medication administration. The students were satisfied with the simulation capacity to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Moreover, simulation represents an added teaching resource in the nursing degree curriculum and is expected to enhance patient safety.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on ICU Healthcare Professionals: A Mixed Methods Study.

The large numbers of patients admitted to intensive care units due to COVID-19 has had a major impact on healthcare professionals. The incidence of mental health disorders among these professionals has increased considerably and their professional quality of life has suffered during the pandemic. This study aims to explore the impact of the provision of COVID-19 patient care on ICU healthcare professionals. A mixed methods study with an exploratory concurrent design was conducted between June and November 2020 in the Balearic Islands, Spain. Data were collected using a self-report online survey (n = 122) based on three validated questionnaires, and individual semi-structured in-depth online interviews (n = 11). Respondents scored 2.5 out of 5 on the moral distress scale, moderate/high on the compassion satisfaction scale, and moderate on the burnout and compassion fatigue subscales. Age was significantly and negatively related to professional quality of life but was positively related to workload and unavailability of protective equipment. Three main groups of themes relating to the impact of the pandemic emerged from the in-depth interviews: (a) clinical, (b) professional, and (c) personal and family impacts in the two waves. ICU healthcare professionals should be viewed as second victims of the COVID-19 pandemic as they have suffered significant psychological, professional, and moral harm.

The Use of Physical Restraints on Geriatric Patients: Culture and Attitudes among Healthcare Professionals at Intermediate Care Hospitals in Majorca. A Qualitative Study Protocol.

The use of physical restraints is a common practice in the care of hospitalised and institutionalised elderly people. This use is determined by factors related to the patients, their families, the healthcare professionals, the institution, and prevailing social values. Today, however, this practice is often questioned because of its physical, psychological, moral, ethical, and legal repercussions. The present study explores attitudes among healthcare professionals towards the physical restraint of geriatric patients in intermediate care hospitals in Majorca. This study is based on a qualitative design, combining an ethnomethodological approach with critical discourse analysis. The theoretical framework is drawn from Foucault's work in this field and from Haslam's theory of mechanisation. Individual interviews will be conducted with physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants at intermediate care hospitals in Majorca. The analysis will focus on these professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding the use of such measures, seeking to identify the factors, especially institutional factors, that determine the use of restraints. It is essential to determine the prevailing culture among healthcare professionals regarding the use of physical restraints on geriatric patients in order to design and propose a more dignified health care model in which such restraints are eliminated.

Students and teachers' satisfaction and perspectives on high-fidelity simulation for learning fundamental nursing procedures: A mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: High-fidelity clinical simulation enables skills to be acquired safely and securely by bridging the gap between theory and clinical practice. This method has traditionally been used to address complex clinical scenarios. Students often report high levels of satisfaction and self-confidence, as this method allows them to put techniques and procedures into practice in a safe environment. Most studies assess simulation solely from the students' perspective, disregarding the opinions of teaching staff. OBJECTIVES: To assess the implementation of high-fidelity simulation as a teaching tool for fundamental nursing procedures from the perspectives of students and teachers. DESIGN: A two-phase mixed-methods study. SETTING: A simulation centre environment at the University of the Balearic Islands (Spain) during the 2018 academic year. PARTICIPANTS: Second-year nursing students and staff teaching practical classes on basic patient assessment and monitoring of vital signs. METHODS: Satisfaction with clinical experience simulation scale, including an open-ended question for students, was used. A focus group session was also held with teachers. RESULTS: A total of 91 students completed the scale, yielding an overall satisfaction score of 9.3 out of 10. The practical dimension attained the highest scores. Motivation to attend class was the lowest-rated aspect of this dimension, although students' expectations and satisfaction increased during the class. In the open-ended question and the debriefing session, students described the simulation as a playful learning method allowing them to put their theoretical knowledge into practice and helping them to manage their fears before coming into contact with real care settings. In the focus group session, teachers analysed their own experiences and described how they perceived students' satisfaction and practical skills. CONCLUSIONS: High-fidelity simulation produces good academic outcomes and is highly satisfying for students and teachers.