RESUMO
Based on the available data of feeding behaviour habits (FBHs), this work aimed to discuss which type of pig, according to its FBHs, performs better and is more efficient. As pigs grow, average daily feed intake, meal size, and feeding rate increase, whereas small variations or even decreases in time spent eating and daily feeder visits have been reported. Moreover, the sex, breed, space allowance, feeder design, feed form, diet composition, and environmental conditions modify FBHs. On the other hand, the literature indicates the existence of four types of pigs: pigs that eat their daily feed intake in many short meals (nibblers) or in few large meals (meal eaters) combined with eating fast (faster eaters) or slow (slow eaters). The available scientific literature about ad libitum fed pigs suggests that pigs eating faster with bigger meals eat more, gain more weight, and are fatter than pigs eating less, slower, and with smaller meals. However, the feeding rate and the meal size do not influence feed efficiency. In conclusion, studies comparing growing-finishing pigs with similar feed intake, but different feeding rate and meal size are needed to better understand the influence of FBHs on feed efficiency.
RESUMO
Five porcine genetic lines which represent a high proportion of European pig production were fully characterized for meat quality parameters and muscle biochemical characteristics (Longissimus thoracis, LT, and Semimembranosus, SM). The line characterisation was based on 100 animals each representing Large White, Landrace, Duroc, Piétrain (Halothane negative) and Meishan (a Meishan/Large White crossbred line) prevalent genetic backgrounds. Different meat quality parameters (pH 45min, pH ultimate, electrical conductivity, and colour measurements), as well as muscle water holding capacity, muscle metabolic and contractile traits, fibre type, size and frequencies were measured and their relationships studied. The main differences in the LT were found between the Meishan and Piétrain genetic lines, in relation to the muscle fibre size (larger in Piétrain). The Duroc line was characterized by the muscle oxidative traits and the Landrace by the high percentage of fast glycolytic fibres. In SM, Duroc and Piétrain were distinguished from Landrace and Meishan according to the metabolic and contractile characteristics of this muscle. Large White tended to lie between the other breeds for many of the traits. The measured muscle characteristics were related to differences in drip loss and marbling values and could thereby influence the eating quality of pork. Overall the results show differences between the genetic lines for a number of muscle traits which could have impact on consumer appeal and eating quality. The present findings should serve to emphasise the importance of including eating quality as a trait in breed selection.
RESUMO
The relationship between muscle biochemical traits, myosin heavy chain I and meat quality of longissimus thoracis was studied using gilts from five divergent porcine lines (A to E) (carcass weight: 83.7±8.7 kg). Intramuscular fat (IMF) and haem pigments content as well as myosin heavy chain 1 (MyHC I) percentage and the activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) were determined. Only group E, a well conformed line of pigs, included the halothane positive genotype. The presence of the Hal gene in this line resulted in meat of poorer quality in terms of meat of higher exudate compared to line D, also a well conformed line of predominantly Pietrain origin but being halothane gene free. Line C presented the highest IMF content (2.02%) as well as high oxidative characteristics (MyHC I, 10.0%; LDH/ICDH, 1.92 µmol nmol(-1); ICDH activity, 1.78 nmol min(-1) g(-1)) and the lowest drip losses (5.3%). According to a principal component analysis including MyHC I, biochemical traits and meat quality parameters, line C was characterized by a high IMF content and oxidative traits, and line B by a high glycolytic metabolism. Line E was distinguished by high drip losses and by low pH(45) and pH(u). In conclusion, several observed differences in muscle metabolism between lines free of the halothane gene (A, B, C and D) must be caused by other "genetic background" factors.
