Humoral and T Cell Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and T cell response after a two-dose regimen of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this observational study, patients with RA who are ≥18 years of age and vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2 according to the Argentine National Health Ministry's vaccination strategy were included. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies (ELISA-COVIDAR test), neutralizing activity (cytotoxicity in VERO cells), and specific T cell response (IFN-γ ELISpot Assay) were assessed after the first and second dose. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients with RA were included. Mostly, homologous regimens were used, including Gam-COVID-Vac (27.5%), ChAdOx1 (24.2%), and BBIBP-CorV (22.5%). The most frequent combination was Gam-COVID-Vac/mRNA-1273 (21.7%). After the second dose, 81.7% presented with anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, 70.0% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65.3% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV and treatment with abatacept (ABA) and rituximab (RTX) were associated with undetectable antibodies and no neutralizing activity after two doses. BBIBP-CorV was also associated with the absence of T cell response. The total incidence of adverse events was 357.1 events per 1,000 doses, significantly lower with BBIBP-CorV (166.7 events per 1,000 doses, P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this RA cohort vaccinated with homologous and heterologous regimens against COVID-19, 2 out of 10 patients did not develop anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 70% presented with neutralizing activity, and 65% presented with specific T cell response. The use of BBIBP-CorV was associated with deficient humoral and cellular response, whereas treatment with ABA and RTX resulted in an impaired anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG formation and neutralizing activity.

Estudio descriptivo de las adaptaciones de la consulta reumatológica durante la pandemia de COVID-19 / Descriptive study of the adaptations of the rheumatological consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introducción: la pandemia de COVID-19 tuvo un gran impacto en la sociedad en general. El aislamiento impuesto modificó las relaciones interpersonales, incluyendo las consultas médicas. Objetivos: describir las consultas reumatológicas en el Servicio de Reumatología del Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP) durante la pandemia por COVID-19, y compararlas con las recibidas durante 2019. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se registraron las consultas recibidas durante marzo-septiembre de 2020. Se recolectaron datos sociodemográficos, número y motivo de las consultas realizadas por paciente. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de regresión logística múltiple para estimar las variables asociadas a la consulta presencial. Resultados: se registraron 1.703 consultas; 798 pacientes consultaron al menos una vez, la mediana de consulta por paciente fue de 3 (RIC 1-12). La principal vía de consulta fue por correo electrónico (57%), solo el 13% fue de forma presencial. El principal motivo fue la solicitud de recetas (60%) seguido por consultas por la enfermedad (23%). Se observó una reducción del total de las consultas con respecto al año previo del 57% (3.961) y una reducción mayor del 94% en el número de consultas presenciales (224). La consulta médica presencial durante la pandemia se asoció independientemente con el sexo masculino (OR: 2.4 IC 95% 1,6-3,6), la consulta por enfermedad de base (OR: 5.8 IC 95% 4,1-8,3) y la ausencia de cobertura social (OR: 2.3 IC 95% 1,6-3,3). Conclusiones: las consultas reumatológicas, especialmente las presenciales, disminuyeron sustancialmente durante la pandemia.

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic had a great impact on society in general. The imposed isolation modified interpersonal relationships, including medical consultations. Objectives: describe the rheumatologic consultations in the Rheumatology Service from Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica (IREP) during the COVID-19 pandemic and compare them with those received the previous year. Materials and methods: observational study. Consultations during March-September 2020 were recorded. Sociodemographics, numbers, and reasons for consultations made per patient were collected. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate variables associated with the in-person consultation. Results: 1,703 consultations were registered. 798 patients consulted at least 1 time, and the median number of consultations per patient was 3 (IQR 1-12). The main method of consultation was by email (57%); only 13% were in person. The main reason was requesting prescriptions (60%) followed by consultations for the disease (23%). We observed a reduction in the total number of consultations compared to the same period in 2019 of 57% (3,961 consultations) and an even greater reduction of 94% in the number of in-person consultations (224 consultations). In-person medical consultation during the pandemic was independently associated with male sex (OR: 2,4, 95%CI 1,6-3,6), consultation due to illness (OR: 5,8, 95%CI 4,1-8,3) and lack of social coverage (OR: 2,3. 95%CI 1,6-3,3). Conclusions: rheumatologic consultations, especially in-person, were substantially reduced during the pandemic.

Frecuencia de comorbilidades en pacientes con artritis psoriásica y evaluación de la adherencia de los médicos a las recomendaciones de tratamiento de las Guías GRAPPA 2015 / Frequency of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis and evaluation of the adherence of physicians to the treatment recommendations of the GRAPPA 2015 Guidelines

Introducción: los pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) presentan más comorbilidades. Las guías del Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) establecen lineamientos para los tratamientos de acuerdo a ellas. Objetivos: describir la prevalencia de comorbilidades en pacientes con APs según el Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI), analizar el efecto sobre la enfermedad y estudiar la adherencia a las guías GRAPPA. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes con APs de la cohorte RAPSODIA. Se reportaron características sociodemográficas y clínicas. Las comorbilidades se valoraron por RDCI. Se estudiaron variables asociadas a RDCI ≥1 mediante análisis multivariado. Se analizó el cumplimiento de las recomendaciones de tratamiento en relación a las comorbilidades según las guías GRAPPA. Resultados: se incluyeron 170 pacientes. El 67,6% presentó al menos una comorbilidad (RDCI ≥1); estos eran de mayor edad (X 57,3±12,7 años vs. 48,2±13,2 años; p<0,0001), presentaban más sobrepeso u obesidad (84,3% vs. 67,3%; p=0,011) y peor calidad de vida (PsAQoL X 7,6±6,6 vs. 5,2±6; p=0,025). El análisis multivariado evidenció asociación de la edad y el uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINEs) con RDCI ≥1. Contrariamente a las recomendaciones de GRAPPA, el 70% de los pacientes con cardiopatía utilizaba AINEs, y la mitad de aquellos con enfermedades hepáticas o renales tomaba AINEs o metotrexato. Conclusiones: la prevalencia de comorbilidades en los pacientes con APs es alta. En algunos casos no se cumplían las recomendaciones de tratamiento en relación a las comorbilidades.

Introduction: comorbidities are common in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The GRAPPA (Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis) guidelines strengthen the choice of treatments according to them. Objetives: to describe the prevalence of comorbidities in patients with psoriatic arthritis according to Rheumatic Disease Comorbidity Index (RDCI) and to analyze the influence of them on disease activity, functional capacity and quality life and to assess adherence to GRAPPA 2015 treatment recommendations according to the presence of comorbidities. Materials and methods: adult patients with PsA (CASPAR criteria) from the RAPSODIA cohort were included. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, disease activity and current treatment were recorded. Comorbidities were assessed by the RDCI. Variables associated with RDCI≥1 were studied by multivariate analysis. Adherence to treatment recommendations in relation to the reported comorbidities was analyzed according to the 2015 GRAPPA guidelines. Results: a total of 170 patients were included. Patients with RDCI ≥1 were reported by 67.6%. These patients were older (57±13 years vs 48±13 years, p<0.0001), had a higher frequency of overweight or obesity (84.3% vs 67.3%, p=0.011), and had a poorer quality of life (PsAQoL 7.6±6.6 vs 5.2±6, p=0.025). The multivariate analysis showed an association between age and the use of NSAIDs with RDCI≥1. Contrary to GRAPPA recommendations, 70% of patients with heart disease were using NSAIDs. Moreover, about half of those with hepatic or kidney disease took NSAIDs or methotrexate. Conclusions: most patients with PsA presented at least one comorbidity. GRAPPA recommendations were not followed in a considerable number of patients.

Impacto de la presencia de depresión y ansiedad en pacientes con artritis psoriásica / Impact of depression and anxiety in patients with psoriatic arthritis

Introducción: un tercio de los pacientes con artritis psoriásica (APs) sufre ansiedad y/o depresión, lo que podría impactar negativamente en la actividad de la enfermedad. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron: evaluar la prevalencia de depresión y ansiedad en pacientes con APs, estudiar su asociación con diferentes factores sociodemográficos y clínicos, y determinar el efecto sobre los diferentes componentes de los índices compuestos de la actividad de la APs. Materiales y métodos: se incluyeron pacientes con APs que cumplían criterios de la Classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR). La depresión se definió según el Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) y la ansiedad según el cuestionario General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). Se realizó regresión logística múltiple para identificar variables asociadas a ansiedad y depresión. Resultados: se incluyeron 100 pacientes con APs, de los cuales el 26% y el 59% presentaron depresión mayor y ansiedad respectivamente. Los pacientes con depresión mayor tuvieron mayor actividad de la enfermedad, dolor, fatiga, ansiedad, y menor educación formal y peor calidad de vida. Aquellos con ansiedad manifestaron mayor actividad de la enfermedad, dolor y fatiga, y peor calidad de vida y capacidad funcional. La alta actividad de la enfermedad y la menor educación formal se asociaron independientemente con depresión mayor. Conclusiones: la presencia de depresión mayor y ansiedad se asoció con mayor actividad de la enfermedad en pacientes con APs.

Introduction: nearly one-third of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients suffer from anxiety and/or depression. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with PsA, establish the relationship with different socio-demographic and clinical factors, and determine the effect of depression and anxiety on various components of disease activity scores. Materials and methods: patients with PsA who met the Classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis (CASPAR) criteria were included. Depression was defined according to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and anxiety according to the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with anxiety and depression. Results: 100 patients were included. The prevalence of major depression and anxiety was 26% and 59%, respectively. Patients with major depression had higher disease activity, pain, fatigue and anxiety, less formal education and worse quality of life. In comparison those patients with anxiety showed higher disease activity, pain and fatigue and worse quality of life and functional capacity. High disease activity and low formal education were independently associated with the existence of major depression. Conclusions: patients with PsA who suffer from major depression and anxiety show higher disease activity levels.

Respuesta immune humoral asociada a las vacunas contra SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea: datos del registro SAR-CoVAC / Humoral immune response associated to the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic arthritis: data from the SAR-CoVAC registry

Introducción: la artritis reumatoidea (AR) y los tratamientos indicados para su manejo pueden afectar la respuesta a la vacuna para SARS-CoV-2. Sin embargo, aún no se cuenta con datos locales. Objetivos: evaluar la respuesta humoral de la vacuna para SARS-CoV-2 y su seguridad en esta población. Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional. Se incluyeron pacientes ≥18 años, con AR ACR/EULAR 2010 que recibieron la vacunación para SARS-CoV-2. Detección de IgG anti-proteína S (kit COVIDAR). Resultados: se incluyeron 120 pacientes con AR. El 24,4% recibió tratamiento con glucocorticoides, 50,9% drogas biológicas y 13,3% inhibidores de JAK (janus kinases). El 6% había tenido infección por SARS-CoV-2 previamente. La vacuna más utilizada en la primera dosis fue Sputnik V (52,9%). El 25% recibió esquemas heterólogos. Luego de la primera dosis, el 59% presentó una prueba no reactiva o indeterminada, y un 18% luego de la segunda dosis. La aplicación de esquemas homólogos de vacuna Sinopharm (63,6% vs 13,3%, p<0,0001), y el uso de abatacept (27,3% vs 5,1%, p=0,005) y rituximab (18,2% vs 0%, p=0,001) al momento de la vacunación se asociaron a un resultado no reactivo o indeterminado. Conclusiones: similar a lo reportado en otras poblaciones internacionales, en esta cohorte, dos de cada 10 pacientes no desarrollaron anticuerpos. Una menor respuesta se asoció con la vacuna Sinopharm y al tratamiento con abatacept y rituximab.

Introduction: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its treatments can affect the response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. However, we still do not have local data. Objectives: to evaluate the humoral response of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and its safety in this population. Materials and methods: observational study. Patients ≥18 years of age, with RA ACR/EULAR 2010 who had received vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 were included. Detection of anti-protein S IgG (COVIDAR Kit). Results: a total of 120 patients with RA were included. A quarter was receiving glucocorticoids, 50.9% biological drugs and 13.3% JAK inhibitors (janus kinases). Only 6% had a history SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most used vaccine was Sputnik V (52.9%) and 25% received mixed regimenes. After the first dose, 59% had a non-reactive or indeterminate test, and after the second, 18% were still having this result. The application of homologous Sinopharm vaccine regimen (63.6% vs 13.3%, p<0.0001) and the use of abatacept (27.3% vs 5.1%, p=0.005) and rituximab (18.2% vs 0%, p=0.001) at vaccination was associated with a non-reactive or indeterminate result. Conclusions: similar to other international populations, in this cohort, two out of 10 patients did not develop antibodies. A lower response was associated with the Sinopharm vaccine and treatment with abatacept and rituximab.