Long-term functional results of transvaginal anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence; a retrospective case series.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: We report our experience with a transvaginal approach with overlapping anal sphincter repair. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate long-term functional outcomes. Women who had undergone transvaginal anal sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence from July 2005 to July 2020 and attended a multidisciplinary team of urogynaecologists and colorectal surgeons at the Mercy Hospital Perineal clinic were included. METHODS: One hundred seven women were included in the study with a median follow-up of 57.5 months. We analysed outcomes by comparing patient's St Mark's score difference before and after surgery. Meaningful clinical difference (MID) was set at 5 points; complications and patient demographics were recorded along with a question about whether they would recommend this treatment to a friend. RESULTS: An improvement was seen in 69.3% of women with a marked improvement in 46.5%. Furthermore, 70% said they would recommend the procedure to a friend, if they were in a similar situation. Wound infection or partial perineal breakdown was reported in 45% of women but did not have a significant impact on outcomes. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal anal sphincter repair is associated with significant improvements in patients' St. Mark's score. Our data show that the long-term success rate of transvaginal/perineal AS repair may be better than previously reported in the literature with 70% of women satisfied at 57 months. Another benefit of the transvaginal route is the possibility of performing a pelvic floor and perineal repair at the time of surgery.

Extraperitoneal high vaginal cuff suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: Results of a modified McCall technique from a longitudinal clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Women with high-grade uterovaginal prolapse have a greater risk of recurrent prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines have recommended sacrospinous suspension (sacrospinous fixation) at the time of vaginal hysterectomy, whenever there is a marked uterovaginal prolapse. We have modified the McCall culdoplasty by placing sutures extraperitoneally, higher and more lateral into the uterosacral/cardinal ligaments to re-support the vaginal cuff at the time of a vaginal hysterectomy. AIMS: To evaluate the results of a modified technique of McCall high culdoplasty and native tissue repair at time of vaginal hysterectomy in women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Longitudinal clinical follow-up conducted between 2000-2018, in a tertiary urogynaecology centre for patients presenting with stage 3-4 uterovaginal prolapse, who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and modified McCall vault suspension. RESULTS: There were 176 cases meeting the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 19.35 months. There were 25 recurrences (14%) of ≥ stage 2 (76% not symptomatic). Twelve of these recurrences (48%) occurred in anterior compartment, six (25%) posterior, three (12%) combined anterior/posterior, two (8%) combined posterior/central and one case had recurrence in all compartments. Only six cases (3%) required another surgical procedure for symptomatic prolapse, all with an enterocele recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our described modified McCall technique incorporates high extraperitoneal approach to apical resuspension along with closure of any existing large hiatal defects of the levator plate at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterine prolapse has excellent outcomes and extremely low complication rates and avoids the need for sacrospinous fixation.

Delayed presentation of mons pubis abscess formation following MUS-case report and surgical video.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has relatively low complication rates. However, although rare, complications such as bladder wall, prepubic and thigh abscess occur. We present an unusual case of MUS vaginal mesh exposure followed by mons pubis abscess formation occurring 18 years postoperatively because of inadvertent prepubic insertion of the right arm. Our objectives were to raise awareness about such a rare complication and to describe the approach for sling removal. METHODS: A 75-year-old woman presented with gradual swelling on the mons pubis followed by pain with a past history of MUS insertion. Examination revealed a palpable, tender, non-fluctuant mass, extending about 10-15 cm from mons pubis to the right labia. There was a 2 × 2-cm vaginal mesh exposure. Following imaging, an examination under anaesthesia was performed with vaginal exploration and complete removal of the right arm of the MUS and closure of the vagina. RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, all surgical sites had healed well, and there was no recurrent SUI or persistent mesh exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Unusual long-term complications of MUS should be considered and recognized. Thorough evaluation is crucial for informed decision-making related to treatment strategies. The vaginal approach to mesh removal is safe and should be practised by experienced surgeons. Patients should be informed regarding the possibility of incontinence after sling removal.

Urethral diverticulum in pregnancy: a case report.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urethral diverticulum in pregnancy is a rare finding and difficult to diagnose. The classical triad of dysuria, dyspareunia and dribbling of urine is found in a minority of women. METHODS: A young woman presented during the first trimester of pregnancy with vaginal and suprapubic pain as well as voiding difficulty. Ultrasound demonstrated a 2-cm hypoechoic lesion to the left of the urethra. She went on to have a cystoscopy that demonstrated a diverticulum. She was found to have chlamydia on PCR. RESULTS: Her pregnancy was complicated by recurrent admissions for pain and also an episode of reactive arthritis. She underwent an uncomplicated surgical excision postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral diverticula should be excluded whenever a patient exhibits unresolved, nonspecific urinary problems. This is an underdiagnosed problem. Pregnancy presents additional challenges, but does not preclude medical or surgical treatment in the patient with significant symptoms.