Prevalence of clinical forms of Chagas disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis - data from the RAISE study.

Background: There is a lack of up-to-date estimates about the prevalence of Chagas disease (ChD) clinical presentations and, therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence of clinical forms of ChD among seropositive adults, pooling available data. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in Medline, Embase, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde and Cochrane databases looking for studies published from 1990 to August 2023, which investigated the prevalence of ChD clinical forms among seropositive adults, including: (i) indeterminate phase, (ii) chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM), (iii) digestive and (iv) mixed (CCM + digestive) forms. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models. Studies quality and risk of bias was assessed with the Leboeuf-Yde and Lauritsen tool. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic. The study was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022354237). Findings: 1246 articles were selected for screening and 73 studies were included in the final analysis (17,132 patients, 44% men). Most studies were conducted with outpatients (n = 50), followed by population-based studies (n = 15). The pooled prevalence of the ChD clinical forms was: indeterminate 42.6% (95% CI: 36.9-48.6), CCM 42.7% (95% CI: 37.3-48.3), digestive 17.7% (95% CI: 14.9-20.9), and mixed 10.2% (95% CI: 7.9-13.2). In population-based studies, prevalence was lower for CCM (31.2%, 95% CI: 24.4-38.9) and higher for indeterminate (47.2%, 95% CI: 39.0-55.5) form. In meta-regression, age was inversely associated with the prevalence of indeterminate (ß = -0.05, P < 0.001) form, and directly associated with CCM (ß = 0.06, P < 0.001) and digestive (ß = 0.02, P < 0.001) forms. Heterogeneity was overall high. Interpretation: Compared to previous publications, our pooled estimates show a higher prevalence of CCM among ChD seropositive patients, but similar rates of the digestive form. Funding: This study was funded by the World Heart Federation, through a research collaboration with Novartis Pharma AG.

Efficacy and safety of the dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide for weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES: Tirzepatide is a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for type 2 diabetes. We performed a meta-analysis to assess tirzepatide's weight reduction efficacy and safety. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials published from inception to July 2022, comparing tirzepatide with placebo for the co-primary endpoints of absolute and percent change in weight. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for continuous and binary outcomes, respectively. Review Manager 5.4.1 and RStudio were used for the statistical analysis, and RoB-2 (Cochrane) to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 397 search results, 6 studies (4036 participants) ranging from 12 to 72 weeks were included. Pooled analysis showed that tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg were more effective than placebo, with MD in body weight of -7.7 kg (95% CI -11.0, -4.4; p < 0.001), -11.6 kg (95% CI -18.8, -4.3; p = 0.002), and -11.8 kg (95% CI -17.4, -6.2; p < 0.001), respectively, and MD in percent change in weight of -8.1% (95% CI -11.0, -5.2; p < 0.001), -11.9% (95% CI -18.1, -5.6; p < 0.001), and -12.4% (95% CI -17.2, -7.5; p < 0.001), respectively. Tirzepatide also reduced BMI and waist circumference. Adverse events were more common with tirzepatide with respect to nausea (OR 4.2; 95% CI 2.4, 7.5; p < 0.001), vomiting (OR 7.0; 95% CI 4.3, 11.4; p < 0.001), and diarrhea (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.6, 4.9; p < 0.001) (15 mg dose), when compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results support that tirzepatide leads to substantial weight reduction and constitutes a valuable therapeutic option for weight management, despite an increase in gastrointestinal symptoms. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: CRD42022348576.

Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors is a standard practice for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors pretreatment remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment on thrombotic and hemorrhagic endpoints in STEMI patients. METHODS: We searched multiple databases for studies that compared P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment with no pretreatment in STEMI patients and reported endpoints of interest. Random effects model was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 3 randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies, comprising 70,465 patients assigned to either P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment (50,328 patients) or no pretreatment (20,137 patients). Compared to no pretreatment, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment did not result in significant reductions in all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.03; p = 0.07), myocardial infarction (RR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.53-1.07; p = 0.11), or major bleeding (RR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.56-1.16; p = 0.22) at 30 days. However, our subgroup analysis revealed that P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment administered in the pre-hospital setting was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction compared to no pretreatment (RR 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56-0.91; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that pretreatment with oral P2Y12 inhibitors before PCI in patients with STEMI was not associated with reduced all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or major bleeding. However, pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors in the pre-hospital setting appears to be beneficial in reducing reinfarction.