Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epilepsy Behav ; 108: 107093, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32402704

RESUMO

Epilepsy surgery is considered to reduce the risk of epilepsy-related mortality, including sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), though data from existing surgical series are conflicting. We retrospectively examined all-cause mortality and SUDEP in a population of 590 epilepsy surgery patients and a comparison group of 122 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy who did not undergo surgery, treated at Columbia University Medical Center between 1977 and 2014. There were 34 deaths in the surgery group, including 14 cases of SUDEP. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for the surgery group was 1.6, and SUDEP rate was 1.9 per 1000 patient-years. There were 13 deaths in the comparison group, including 5 cases of SUDEP. Standardized mortality ratio for the comparison group was 3.6, and SUDEP rate was 4.6 per 1000 patient-years. Both were significantly greater than in the surgery group (p < 0.05). All but one of the surgical SUDEP cases, and all of the comparison group SUDEP cases, had a history of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (BTCS). Of postoperative SUDEP cases, one was seizure-free, and two were free of BTCS at last clinical follow-up. Time to SUDEP in the surgery group was longer than in the comparison group (10.1 vs 5.9 years, p = 0.013), with 10 of the 14 cases occurring >10 years after surgery. All-cause mortality was reduced after epilepsy surgery relative to the comparison group. There was an early benefit of surgery on the occurrence of SUDEP, which was reduced after 10 years. A larger, multicenter study is needed to further investigate the time course of postsurgical SUDEP.


Assuntos
Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/mortalidade , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/cirurgia , Epilepsias Parciais/mortalidade , Epilepsias Parciais/cirurgia , Morte Súbita Inesperada na Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Causas de Morte/tendências , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Convulsões/mortalidade , Convulsões/cirurgia
2.
Epilepsia ; 59(3): 595-606, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29392715

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Selective laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) using magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is emerging as a treatment option for drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). SLAH is less invasive than open resection, but there are limited series reporting its safety and efficacy, particularly in patients without clear evidence of mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS). METHODS: We report seizure outcomes and complications in our first 30 patients who underwent SLAH for drug-resistant MTLE between January 2013 and December 2016. We compare patients who required stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to confirm mesial temporal onset with those treated based on imaging evidence of MTS. RESULTS: Twelve patients with SEEG-confirmed, non-MTS MTLE and 18 patients with MRI-confirmed MTS underwent SLAH. MTS patients were older (median age 50 vs 30 years) and had longer standing epilepsy (median 40.5 vs 5.5 years) than non-MTS patients. Engel class I seizure freedom was achieved in 7 of 12 non-MTS patients (58%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 30%-86%) and 10 of 18 MTS patients (56%, 95% CI 33%-79%), with no significant difference between groups (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI 0.26-4.91, P = .88). Length of stay was 1 day for most patients (range 0-3 days). Procedural complications were rare and without long-term sequelae. SIGNIFICANCE: We report similar rates of seizure freedom following SLAH in patients with MTS and SEEG-confirmed, non-MTS MTLE. Consistent with early literature, these rates are slightly lower than typically observed with surgical resection (60%-80%). However, SLAH is less invasive than open surgery, with shorter hospital stays and recovery, and severe procedural complications are rare. SLAH may be a reasonable first-line surgical option for patients with both MTS and SEEG confirmed, non-MTS MTLE.


Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/cirurgia , Hipocampo/patologia , Hipocampo/cirurgia , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Técnicas Estereotáxicas , Adulto , Idoso , Eletroencefalografia/tendências , Epilepsia do Lobo Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Esclerose , Técnicas Estereotáxicas/tendências , Lobo Temporal/patologia , Lobo Temporal/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Neuromodulation ; 20(7): 678-683, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28580703

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study is to assess the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation (e-TNS) via a transcutaneous supraorbital stimulator as an acute treatment for migraine attacks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, open-labeled clinical trial conducted at the Columbia University Headache Center (NY, USA). Thirty patients who were experiencing an acute migraine attack with or without aura were treated with a one-hour session of e-TNS (CEFALY Technology) at the clinic. Pain intensity was scored using a visual analogue scale (VAS) before the treatment, after the one-hour treatment session, and at two hours after treatment initiation. Rescue migraine medication intake was recorded at 2 and 24 hours. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mean pain intensity was significantly reduced by 57.1% after the one-hour e-TNS treatment (-3.22 ± 2.40; p < 0.001) and by 52.8% at two hours (-2.98 ± 2.31; p < 0.001). No patients took rescue medication within the two-hour observation phase. Within the 24-hour follow-up, 34.6% of patients used a rescue medication. No adverse events or subjective complaints were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this open-labeled study suggest that transcutaneous supraorbital neurostimulation may be a safe and effective acute treatment for migraine attacks, and merits further study with a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Nervo Trigêmeo , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...