Bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer: could it be particularly effective in patients with clear cell carcinoma?

PURPOSE: Treatment of recurrent ovarian carcinoma is a challenge, particularly for the clear cell (CCC) subtype. However, there is a preclinical rationale that these patients could achieve a benefit from antiangiogenic therapy. To assess this hypothesis, we used the growth modulation index (GMI), which represents an intrapatient comparison of two successive progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective real-world study performed on 34 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, treated with bevacizumab-containing regimens from January 2009 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was GMI. An established cut-off > 1.33 was defined as a sign of drug activity. RESULTS: 73.5% of patients had high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC), and 17.7% had CCC; 70.6% of patients received carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab, and 29.4% received weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab. According to histological subtype, the overall response rate and median PFS were 52% and 14 months for HGSOC and 83.3% and 20 months for CCC, respectively. The overall population median GMI was 0.99; it was 0.95 and 2.36 for HGSOC and CCC, respectively. CCC subtype was significantly correlated with GMI > 1.33 (odds ratio 41.67; 95% confidence interval 3.6-486.94; p = .03). CONCLUSION: Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy in recurrent CCC is associated with a remarkable benefit in this cohort. The efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs in CCC warrants further prospective evaluation.

Evaluation of belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a clinical practice setting: Results from a 24-month OBSErve study in Argentina.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical effectiveness of belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in real-world practice in Argentina. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study analysed medical record data of patients with SLE treated with belimumab in 15 centres in Argentina. Primary endpoint: overall clinical response (assessed on a scale similar to the 6-point Physician Global Assessment) at months 6, 12, 18 and 24, all versus index (belimumab initiation). Secondary endpoints: improvement in disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI), SLE manifestations, and corticosteroid dose change. RESULTS: Records for 81 patients (91% female) were analysed. Clinical improvements were reported for 95%, 95%, 98% and 100% patients at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. Mean SELENA-SLEDAI score decreased from 11.21 at index to 4.76, 3.77, 3.86 and 2.17 at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. Number of flares decreased from 1.05 at index to 0.21, 0.09, 0.22 and 0.30 at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. Mean corticosteroid dose was 14.59 mg/day at index, and 6.45, 5.18, 5.17 and 4.78 mg/day at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post index, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world patients with SLE treated with belimumab in Argentina demonstrated clinical improvements and reductions in corticosteroid dose.

Sexto reporte de eventos adversos con tratamientos biológicos en Argentina: Informe del registro BIOBADASAR / Sixth report of adverse events with biological treatments in Argentina: Report of the BIOBADASAR registry

Objetivo: Actualizar los resultados del registro BIOBADASAR sobre seguridad, duración y causas de interrupción del tratamiento luego de 8 años de seguimiento. Métodos: BIOBADASAR es un registro de seguridad de terapias biológicas establecido por la Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología. Se presenta la descripción de BIOBADASAR 3.0, una cohorte compuesta por 53 centros de Argentina seguidos prospectivamente desde agosto de 2010 hasta enero de 2018. Resultados: Se registraron 4656 pacientes, 6234 tratamientos [3765 casos (terapia con biológicos) y 2469 controles (terapia no biológicos)]. Se interrumpió el tratamiento en el 44,6% en los casos vs. 27,9% en los controles. Causa principal de discontinuación fue por ineficacia (40% casos vs. 32% controles). Se presentaron 3154 eventos adversos (2230 en casos vs. 924 en controles), de los cuales el 13,6% fueron graves (9,8% en casos y 3,7% en controles). El evento adverso (EA) más frecuente en ambos grupos fueron las infecciones (43,56% en casos vs. 34,31% en los controles, RR: 3,42; IC 95%: 3,02-3,88), y de ellas las de vías aéreas superiores (14,5%). Las neoplasias se presentaron en 78 casos vs. 45 en controles (RR: 1,98; IC 95%: 1,37-2,86). Conclusiones: En este sexto reporte no se observan tendencias diferentes sobre seguridad, duración y causas de interrupción del tratamiento respecto a informes previos. Las infecciones fueron el principal EA y la ineficacia, seguido por EA y la pérdida de pacientes las principales causas de suspensión del tratamiento. El advenimiento de nuevos agentes biológicos y la necesidad de control en seguridad a largo plazo, fortalece el uso de este tipo de registro.

Objective: Update the results of the BIOBADASAR registry on safety, duration and causes of treatment interruption after 8 years of follow-up. Methods: BIOBADASAR is a safety record of biological therapies established by the Argentine Society of Rheumatology. The description of BIOBADASAR 3.0 is presented, a cohort of 53 centers in Argentina followed prospectively from August 2010 to January 2018. Results: 4656 patients were registered, 6234 treatments [3765 cases (therapy with biologicals) and 2469 controls (non-biological therapy)]. Treatment was interrupted in 44.6% in cases vs. 27.9% in controls. Main cause of discontinuation was due to inefficiency (40% cases vs. 32% controls). There were 3154 adverse events (2230 in cases vs. 924 in controls), of which 13.6% were tombs (9.8% in cases and 3.7% in controls). The most frequent adverse event (AE) in both groups were infections (43.56% in cases vs. 34.31% in controls, RR: 3.42, 95% CI: 3.02-3.88), and the upper airway pathways (14.5%). Neoplasms were published in 78 cases versus 45 controls (RR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.37-2.86). Conclusions: In this article, there are no different trends regarding safety, duration and causes of interruption of treatment compared to previous reports. Infections were the main causes of treatment discontinuation. The advent of new biological agents and the need for control over long-term security, strengthens the use of this type of registration.

Estudio multicéntrico no intervencional en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea tratados con tocilizumab / Non-interventional multicenter study in patients with arthritis rheumatoid treated with tocilizumab

Introducción: Tocilizumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal humanizado anti-receptor de IL-6 que ha demostrado eficacia y seguridad en artritis reumatoidea (AR). Métodos y objetivos: Estudio observacional de cohorte en pacientes con AR moderada a severa tratados con tocilizumab con 6 meses de seguimiento. El objetivo primario fue establecer la adherencia al tratamiento y secundariamente estudiar la efectividad y seguridad. Resultados: Cincuenta pacientes fueron tratados con tocilizumab (86% asociados a DMAR y 14% a monoterapia). La adherencia fue 42/50 (84%; IC 95%: 71-93%) y el porcentaje de respuesta luego de 6 meses según criterios de la ACR20/50/70/90 fueron 68,2%, 40,9%, 13,6% y9,1% respectivamente. El recuento de 28 articulaciones dolorosas (TJC28) e inflamadas (SJC28) se redujo significativamente de 12 y 8 en el momento basal a 5 y 2 a los 6 meses respectivamente (p <0,001). Se observó una reducción significativa en los parámetros de evaluación de actividad del médico y en las evaluaciones reportadas por el paciente. No se registraron eventos adversos de intensidad severa ni eventos adversos serios relacionados con la medicación. Conclusiones: Se observó que 42/50 pacientes adhirieron al tratamiento con una respuesta significativa en los parámetros de efectividad y adecuado perfil de seguridad consistente con los estudios publicados previamente

Características de los tratamientos biológicos en enfermedades reumáticas en Argentina: quinto informe del registro BIOBADASAR / Features of rheumatic diseases biological treatments in Argentina: BIOBADASAR fifth report

Introducción: El proyecto BIOBADASAR (Registro argentino deeventos adversos con tratamientos biológicos en reumatología)comenzó en agosto de 2010, para recabar información a largo plazosobre los eventos adversos en tratamientos biológicos en pacientescon enfermedades reumáticas en la práctica clínica cotidiana enArgentina.Pacientes y método: Se registraron datos de cada paciente,tratamientos y acontecimientos adversos relevantes o importantes.Los pacientes debían tener enfermedad diagnosticada y tratadacon un agente biológico. Cada caso se comparó con un control:un paciente con tratamiento no biológico con característicasdemográficas similares. Se analizaron los datos con análisis de lavarianza, con test de t de Student, Mann Whitney, test chi2, o testexacto de Fisher. El análisis de supervivencia de los tratamientoshasta su discontinuación o interrupción se realizó con el método deKaplan-Meier y test log-rank...

Background: BIOBADASAR (Argentine Registry of Adverse Eventsin Biological Treatments in Rheumatology) was started in August2010 to obtain long-term information of patients with rheumatic diseases,treatments and adverse events in everyday clinical practice.Patients and methods: Data on patients’ demographics,treatments and adverse events were collected. Patients had a diagnosisof a rheumatic disease and were treated with biological agent.To compare information, a control group was included, consisting ofpatients treated with similar demographic characteristics but treatedwith a non-biological agent. Data were analysed with Anova,Student´s t, Mann Whitney, chi2, Fisher´s exact tests, as appropriate.Survival analysis of treatments was performed with Kaplan-Meiercurves and log-rank test...

[Satisfaction of relatives of the patients admitted to an intensive careunit: Perceptions of relatives and professionals]. / Satisfacción de los familiares de los pacientes ingresados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos: percepción de los familiares y los profesionales

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the satisfaction of relatives of critical care patients with regard to the environment, relationship with professionals and visitation and compare it to the perception of professionals. METHODOLOGY: A descriptive study in two phases. In the first phase validated telephone survey within 15 days of discharge to the relatives of the patients was performed. In the second phase, the same modified questionnaire was self-administered to the professionals. The same variables were studied in both populations. RESULTS: We interviewed 78 family members and 44 professionals. 95% of professionals vs 67% of the families claimed not to know the name of the nurses (P < .001). Over 70% of professionals and families agreed that the visit protocol is correct and that the information was adequate income. 70% of professionals felt that the information received at admission is not understood by the family although 97% of households claimed to have understood themselves. Statistically significant differences were observed in relation to the location of the unit assessment, the waiting, the aspects of information and comfort, always being the professionals who felt greater dissatisfaction (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The perceptions of relatives and professionals were mostly uneven, making it necessary to continue exploring the differences through qualitative and participatory methodologies.

Satisfacción de los familiares de los pacientes ingresados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos: percepción de los familiares y los profesionales / Satisfaction of relatives of the patients admitted to an intensive care unit: Perceptions of relatives and professionals

Objetivos: Estimar la satisfacción de familiares de pacientes críticos con respecto al entorno asistencial, la relación con los profesionales y el régimen de visitas, y compararla con la percepción de los profesionales. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo en 2 fases. En la primera fase se realizó encuesta telefónica validada a los 15días del alta a los familiares de los pacientes. En la segunda fase se entregó el mismo cuestionario modificado autoadministrado para los profesionales. Resultados: Se entrevistó a 78 familiares y 44 profesionales. El 95% de los profesionales vs el 67% de los familiares afirmaban no conocer el nombre de los profesionales de enfermería (p < 0,001). Más del 70% de los profesionales y los familiares coincidían en que el protocolo de visitas es correcto y que la información era adecuada al ingreso. El 70% de los profesionales percibieron que la información recibida al ingreso no es comprendida por los familiares, aunque un 97% de los familiares afirmaban sí haberla comprendido. Se observan diferencias estadísticamente significativas en relación con la valoración sobre la localización de la unidad, la sala de espera, la de información y aspectos de la comodidad, siendo siempre los profesionales los que estimaban mayor insatisfacción (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: La percepción de los familiares y los profesionales fue mayoritariamente desigual, por lo que consideramos necesario continuar explorando las diferencias a través de metodologías cualitativas y participativas

Objectives: To estimate the satisfaction of relatives of critical care patients with regard to the environment, relationship with professionals and visitation and compare it to the perception of professionals. Methodology: A descriptive study in two phases. In the first phase validated telephone survey within 15 days of discharge to the relatives of the patients was performed. In the second phase, the same modified questionnaire was self-administered to the professionals. The same variables were studied in both populations. Results: We interviewed 78 family members and 44 professionals. 95% of professionals vs 67% of the families claimed not to know the name of the nurses (P < .001). Over 70% of professionals and families agreed that the visit protocol is correct and that the information was adequate income. 70% of professionals felt that the information received at admission is not understood by the family although 97% of households claimed to have understood themselves. Statistically significant differences were observed in relation to the location of the unit assessment, the waiting, the aspects of information and comfort, always being the professionals who felt greater dissatisfaction (P < .05). Conclusions: The perceptions of relatives and professionals were mostly uneven, making it necessary to continue exploring the differences through qualitative and participatory methodologies

BIOBADASER, BIOBADAMERICA, and BIOBADADERM: safety registers sharing commonalities across diseases and countries.

Registers facilitate the collection and communication of safety concerns. There are as many different register structures as registers, making the merging of rare data and comparison between registers difficult. BIOBADASER, the Safety Register of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology has served as template for other registers within the specialty, BIOBADAMERICA, and outside rheumatology, BIOBADADERM. Here we present the limitations and strengths of such template registers.

Defectos de cierre orofaciales: paladar hendido y labio leporino. Una revisión bibliográfica / Orofacial closure defects: cleft lip and palate. A literature review

Los defectos de cierre orofaciales son un problema relativamente frecuente que supone un importante consumo de recursos sanitarios, además del sufrimiento que llevan implícito para el paciente y su familia. Existen diversas teorías que explican su origen, aunque ninguna tiene evidencias suficientemente sólidas. Las más aceptadas suponen una importante base genética que podría verse modificada por la presencia de agentes externos. Conocer las causas que los provocan permitiría intentar prevenir su aparición, campo en el que el médico de familia puede tener un importante papel (AU)

Orofacial clefts are a common problem that can lead to significant healthcare use and costs, as well as suffering on the part of the affected individuals and families. There are several theories explaining their origin, but some of the findings are inconsistent. The most accepted theories involve a major genetic basis that could be modified by the presence of external agents. Understanding the underlying causes could help to prevent its occurrence, an area in which the family physician can play an important role (AU)

[Orofacial closure defects: cleft lip and palate. A literature review]. / Defectos de cierre orofaciales: paladar hendido y labio leporino. Una revisión bibliográfica.

Orofacial clefts are a common problem that can lead to significant healthcare use and costs, as well as suffering on the part of the affected individuals and families. There are several theories explaining their origin, but some of the findings are inconsistent. The most accepted theories involve a major genetic basis that could be modified by the presence of external agents. Understanding the underlying causes could help to prevent its occurrence, an area in which the family physician can play an important role.

Difficult clinical management of anti-tuberculosis DRESS syndrome.

We describe 11 cases of anti-tuberculosis DRESS (drug-related rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome, a potentially serious complication of treatment that led to interruption of treatment for prolonged periods, systemic corticosteroid use and the resumption of treatment with less effective regimens. All patients had rash and toxic hepatitis, one died of multi-organ failure and, contrary to expectations, the evolution of tuberculosis (advanced in most cases) did not progress under corticosteroid treatment. The drug most frequently involved was rifampicin, while retreatment schemes included, in most cases, levofloxacin, ethambutol, streptomycin and cycloserine.

Tercer reporte de eventos adversos con tratamientos biológicos en Argentina. Informe de registro biobadasar / Thrid report of adverse events with biologics in Argentina. Report from biobadasar registry

Introducción: BIOBADASAR (Registro Argentino de Eventos Adversos con Tratamientos Biológicos en Reumatología) comenzó en agosto de 2010. La importancia de este registro es mostrar datos locales que, probablemente, puedan diferir de otros registros. El objetivo es comunicar los resultados del tercer reporte de BIOBADASAR. Métodos: Todos los pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas que requirieron tratamiento con agentes biológicos y pacientes controles sin estos tratamientos fueron incluidos en la base de datos provenientes de 32 centros participando a lo largo de la Argentina. Tres áreas de datos son analizados: características de los pacientes, tratamientos y eventos adversos...

Introduction: BIOBADASAR (Argentine Registry of Adverse Events with Biological Treatments in Rheumatology) began in August 2010. The importance of this registry is to show local data that may probably differ from other registries. The objective is to communicate the results of the third BIOBADASAR report. Methods: All patients with rheumatic diseases who required treatment with biological agents and control patients without these treatments were included in the database from 32 participating centers throughout Argentina. Three areas of data are analyzed: patient characteristics, treatments and adverse events...

Monoterapia biológica en pacientes con artritis reumatoidea en Argentina / Biological monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Argentina

Introducción: La utilización de agentes biológicos para el tratamiento de la Artritis Reumatoidea (AR) es habitualmente usada en aquellos pacientes con enfermedad activa que no hayan respondido al tratamiento con drogas modificadoras de la Artritis Reumatoidea convencionales (DMARD, por sus siglas en inglés) o que hayan presentado intolerancia a las mismas. Al estado actual de la evidencia, la terapia combinada de agentes biológicos más un DMARD convencional (principalmente metotrexato) constituye el estándar de tratamiento. Sin embargo existen algunos escenarios como la intolerancia, la falta de adherencia y la aparición de eventos adversos a las DMARDs convencionales donde la monoterapia biológica emerge como una opción terapéutica válida. Según los distintos registros a nivel internacional, la frecuencia de utilización de agentes biológicos en monoterapia oscila entre 12 a 39%. Debido a la ausencia de estos datos a nivel local decidimos realizar este estudio para conocer el porcentaje de pacientes que se encuentran en monoterapia biológica y analizar las causas que llevaron a este tipo de tratamiento. Materiales y métodos: Estudio de tipo corte transversal donde se invitó a participar a diferentes centros reumatológicos distribuidos a lo largo de Argentina. Cada centro revisó las historias clínicas de los últimos 30 a 50 pacientes consecutivos vistos con AR, mayores de 18 años, que habían presentado inadecuada respuesta al tratamiento con DMARDs y que estaban bajo tratamiento biológico. Se completaba una ficha por cada paciente incluido, registrando datos demográficos, de la enfermedad y tratamientos previos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 32 centros y se evaluaron 1148 historias clínicas de pacientes con AR durante el mes de octubre y noviembre del 2012. Un 21,4% (246) de los pacientes al momento del estudio se encontraba bajo tratamiento biológico en monoterapia...

Introduction: The use of biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is commonly used in patients with active disease who have not responded to treatment with conventional rheumatoid arthritis-modifying drugs (DMARDs) or Who have presented intolerance to them. At the present state of evidence, combined therapy of biological agents plus conventional DMARD (mainly methotrexate) is the standard of treatment. However, there are some scenarios such as intolerance, lack of adherence and the appearance of adverse events to conventional DMARDs where biological monotherapy emerges as a valid therapeutic option. According to different international registries, the frequency of use of biological agents in monotherapy ranges from 12 to 39%. Due to the absence of these data at the local level we decided to carry out this study to know the percentage of patients who are in biological monotherapy and to analyze the causes that led to this type of treatment. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study where different rheumatologic centers throughout Argentina were invited to participate. Each center reviewed the medical records of the last 30 to 50 consecutive patients seen with RA, older than 18 years, who had inadequate response to treatment with DMARDs and who were under biological treatment. One card was completed for each patient included, recording demographic, disease and previous treatment data. Results: Thirty-two centers were included and 1148 clinical records of patients with RA were evaluated during October and November 2012. A total of 244 patients (246) at the time of the study were under monotherapy...

Primer reporte de eventos adversos de tratamientos biológicos en Argentina. Informe de Registro BIOBADASAR / First report of adverse events for biologic treatments in Argentine. BIOBADASAR Register

Introducción: En la actualidad existe gran cantidad de pacientes sometidos a tratamiento con agentes biológicos en enfermedades reumatológicas y se desconocen los efectos adversos predominantes, así como la eficacia y tasa de discontinuación de nuestros pacientes en dichos tratamientos. Objetivo: Comunicar los primeros resultados de BIOBADASAR, Registro Argentino de Acontecimientos Adversos ocasionados por el Uso de Agentes Biológicos en Reumatología. Métodos: Participan del registro 56 centros de Reumatología de Argentina. Se requiere el ingreso de un paciente no tratado con agentes biológicos por cada paciente expuesto ingresado en el registro. Datosdesde el 1 de agosto de 2010 hasta 1 abril 2011. Las variables categóricasse calcularon con chi cuadrado y las continuas con T student. Se calcularon porcentajes de incidencia y por persona/año. Resultados: Se incorporaron 966 pacientes (1132 tratamientos). Mujeres 763 (79%) y hombres 203 (21%). La edad media fue 52 años (3-88); 543 pacientes (56%) fueron tratados con agentes biológicos (casos) y 423 (44%) fueron no tratados con agentes biológicos (controles). 786 pacientes tenían artritis reumatoidea (81,4%) y 79 artritis psoriásica (8,2%), entre otros diagnósticos. La media de tiempo de evolución de enfermedad fue 11 años para los casos y 8,25 años para los controles. El fármaco biológico más utilizado fue el etanercept con 348 tratamientos (50%) y una supervivencia al tratamiento en años cuya media fue 2,90 seguido por el adalimumab con 158 tratamientos (22,7%) y una supervivencia al tratamiento en años cuya media fue 2,15. La causa más frecuente de interrupción de tratamiento en los casos fue ineficacia (42,1%) seguido por eventos adversos (32%).

Características diferenciales entre espondilitis anquilosante pura y espondilitis psoriásica en pacientes argentinos / Differential features between pure ankylosing spondylitis and spondylitis associated to psoriasis in argentine patients

El compromiso axial, característico de la Espondilitis Anquilosante (EA), puede también presentarse en pacientes con diagnóstico de Artritis Psoriásica (APs). El objetivo del presente estudio fue describir las características diferenciales de pacientes con diagnóstico de EA pura comparados con los pacientes con APs y compromiso axial asociado, ingresados en el Registro Iberoamericano de Espondiloartropatías (SpA) (RESPONDIA-Argentina). Pacientes y métodos: Se seleccionaron aquellos pacientes que cumplían criterios de Nueva York modificados, pertenecientes a la cohorte prospectiva, observacional y multicéntrica de SpA en Argentina (RESPONDIA-Argentina), que acudieron a la consulta ambulatoria entre junio y diciembre del 2006. Los datos fueron extraídos online de la base REGISPONSER. Se recolectaron datos de actividad de la enfermedad, status funcional, características clínicas y radiológicas, tratamiento y calidad de vida, mediante herramientas validadas.Análisis estadístico: Para la comparación de datos categóricos se utilizó el Test de Chi Cuadrado o Test Exacto de Fisher y para las variables continuas el Test de Student y Test de Mann-Whitney. Se consideró significativa una p <0,05. Resultados: Se incluyeron 140 pacientes, 86 (61,4%) presentaban diagnóstico de EA y 54 (38,6%) Espondilitis Psoriásica (EPs). El tiempo de evolución de la enfermedad fue comparable en ambos grupos (mediana 3 vs. 5,5 años, respectivamente). En pacientes con diagnóstico de EA predominó en forma significativa el sexo masculino 88% vs. 48,1% (p <0,05), el antecedente de lumbalgia 81,4% vs. 51,9% (p <0,05), la presencia de síndrome sacroilíaco 52,3% vs. 33,3% (p <0,05), el antecedente de historia familiar de SpA 23,4% vs. 7,7% (p <0,05) y el compromiso moderado de caderas 20,9% vs. 2,1%(p<0,05)...

Axial involvement, characteristic feature of Ankylosing Spondylitis(AS), can also be present in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).Purpose: To describe differential characteristics of the axial involvementin AS as compared with that seen in PsA patients. Patients and methods: Consecutive Spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients attending ambulatory care in 11 rheumatology services locatedin 6 different Argentine provinces between June and December2006 were enrolled. Patients were diagnosed in accordance to the classification criteria of the European Spondyloarhtropathy Study Group (ESSG), and were included in a prospective, observational and multi-centre cohort of SpA in Argentina (RESPONDIAArgentina). Data were collected, transmitted on-line and stored in the Spanish SpA Registry (REGISPONSER) website. Demographic,disease activity and functional status, clinical forms, treatment and quality of life data were collected by means of validated tools. For this analysis, patients were selected only if they met modified New York criteria for AS.Statistical analysis: Categorical...

Adaptación al español y validación del cuestionario de detección epidemiológica para artritis reumatoidea / Adaptation and validation to Spanish of rheumatoid arthritis epidemiology detection questionnaire

La detección epidemiológica de la artritis reumatoidea constituye un desafío, dado lo proteiforme de su presentación, por lo que la generación o adaptación y validación de instrumentos es de vital importancia. El objetivo de este estudio es la adaptación lingüística y validación al castellano de un cuestionario utilizado previamente (The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden. Scand J Rheumatol 1999; 28:340-3). Se utilizó una muestra de pacientes con artritis reumatoidea conocida (criterios ACR 87) y controles sanos (N total = 100) para estimar las propiedades de factibilidad, fiabilidad, validez, sensibilidad y especificidad. La sensibilidad del instrumento fue del 100 por ciento (96,9-100), especificidad 94,1 por ciento (88,4-99,7), con un coeficiente Kappa 0,83 (IC95 por ciento: 0,70-0,97) p <0,01. La concordancia entre las preguntas resultó significativa, con Kappa 0,81 (IC95 por ciento: 0,66-0,96) p <0,01 y la consistencia interna mostró un coeficiente de Cronbach 0,892. El análisis factorial exploratorio mostró dosdimensiones coherentes con la versión original.

The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling.

Jasmonates are essential phytohormones for plant development and survival. However, the molecular details of their signalling pathway remain largely unknown. The identification more than a decade ago of COI1 as an F-box protein suggested the existence of a repressor of jasmonate responses that is targeted by the SCF(COI1) complex for proteasome degradation in response to jasmonate. Here we report the identification of JASMONATE-INSENSITIVE 3 (JAI3) and a family of related proteins named JAZ (jasmonate ZIM-domain), in Arabidopsis thaliana. Our results demonstrate that JAI3 and other JAZs are direct targets of the SCF(COI1) E3 ubiquitin ligase and jasmonate treatment induces their proteasome degradation. Moreover, JAI3 negatively regulates the key transcriptional activator of jasmonate responses, MYC2. The JAZ family therefore represents the molecular link between the two previously known steps in the jasmonate pathway. Furthermore, we demonstrate the existence of a regulatory feed-back loop involving MYC2 and JAZ proteins, which provides a mechanistic explanation for the pulsed response to jasmonate and the subsequent desensitization of the cell.

Oligoartritis como forma de presentación temprana de sarcoma granulocítico / Oligoarthritis as inicial manifestation of granulocytic sarcoma

La literatura médica refiere bastamente la asociación de neoplasia y enfermedad reumática pero, en general, de una manera poco consistente. Neoplasmas sólidos, linfomas, mielomas y leucemias pueden causar enfermedad reumática por infiltración o por mecanismos inmunológicos, pero en la mayoría de los casos es difícil demostrar causalidad.1 Numerosos autores debaten este tema, existen muchas publicaciones internacionales al respecto citándose diferentes tipos de cáncer en el contexto de varios síndromes de naturaleza autoinmune. 2,3 Síndromes autoinmunes paraneoplásicos se observan también en pacientes con enfermedad mielodisplásica. Una revisión de casos individuales y pequeñas series sugieren que alrededor del 10% de estos pacientes puede experimentar varios síndromes autoinmunes, incluyendo como manifestaciones clínicas más frecuentes vasculitis cutáneas y sistémicas, fiebre, artritis, infiltrados pulmonares, polineuropatía periférica, enfermedad intestinal inflamatoria y glomerulonefritis que habitualmente responden también al tratamiento inmunosupresor o esteroideo

Analysis of drug resistance-associated mutations in treatment-naïve individuals infected with different genetic forms of HIV-1 circulating in countries of the former Soviet Union.

There are few data on drug resistance-associated mutations in the former Soviet Union since, studies have usually been focused on the env or gag genes for subtype information. This study examines the prevalence and patterns of resistance-associated mutations to reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitors (RTI, PRI) in 278 HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve subjects from countries of Eastern Europe, and defines characteristic polymorphisms of RT and PR sequences in HIV-1 subtype A viruses. Blood samples were collected between 1997 and 2004. Plasma RNA was used for PR-RT amplification by reverse transcription coupled with nested PCR and sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis was done with neighbor-joining trees and bootscanning. Analysis of drug resistance mutations, with Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database's algorithm, resulted in an overall prevalence of 12.9% resistance to RTI and 3.9% to PRI. The most frequent substitutions in the RT region were at positions 62 and 236. V77I substitution in PR was found in 47.8% of samples. Polymorphisms in subtype A sequences were identified. This is the first study reporting the prevalence and patterns of both PRI and RTI resistance-associated mutations in naïve HIV-1 infected patients from the former Soviet Union. These data underline the importance of genotypic resistance testing of chronically HIV-1-infected patients before initiating treatment, in order to select the most suitable drug regimen.

Natural resistance-associated mutations to Enfuvirtide (T20) and polymorphisms in the gp41 region of different HIV-1 genetic forms from T20 naive patients.

BACKGROUND: The natural occurrence of primary resistance mutations in reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR) genes of HIV-1 isolates from untreated patients has been reported and it may have important implications for the response to drug treatment. It is predictable that the same occurs in the HR1 region of gp41 sequence from patients who have never received T20 therapy, and in this regard it would be important to know not only the mutation frequencies at HR1 region but also the natural polymorphisms at resistance-associated positions present in the absence of this drug. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to investigate the existence of natural resistance-associated mutations to T20 in HR1 gp41 region corresponding to different HIV-1 genetic forms from T20 naive patients and to determine their prevalence. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred HIV-1 gp41 sequences were included: subtype B: 164 (81.3%); subtype A: 15 (8.2%); subtype G: 10 (4.6%); subtype F: 6 (3.5%); subtype C: 3 (1.8%); subtype K: 1 (0.6%); and subtype D: 1 (0.6%). We analyzed the resistance-associated mutations previously described: Q32H/R, G36D/S, I37V, V38A/M, Q39R/H, Q40H, N42T/D/Q/H, N43D/S/K/Q, L44M, L45M, R46M and V69I. RESULTS: Natural resistance mutations to T20 were found at a high frequency: 10.5%, corresponding to 9.1% in subtype B and 16.7% in non-B subtype samples. Polymorphisms were more frequent in non-B and recombinant forms than in subtype B (p<0.001). Different substitutions were related to subtypes: N42S in subtypes A, B, G and C, but not in F, Q56R in subtype A from CRF02_AG, and L54M in subtype B from CRF14_BG. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study describing natural-resistance to T20 among different HIV-1 subtypes, warranting a study of the biological significance of this mutations and their clinical relevance. The detection of differences between subtypes may have an influence on the rate and patterns of resistance in patients undergoing T20 treatment.