Plasma and red blood cell concentrations of zinc, copper, selenium and magnesium in the first week of paediatric critical illness.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Critically ill children are at risk of micronutrient deficiencies, which might lead to poor clinical outcomes. However, the interpretation of micronutrient concentrations in plasma is complicated due to age-dependent and critical illness-dependent changes. Certain red blood cell (RBC) concentrations might reflect the overall body status more reliably than plasma levels in the presence of systemic inflammatory response. This study longitudinally examined micronutrient concentrations in both plasma and RBC in critically ill children. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC RCT investigated the impact of early versus late initiation of parenteral macronutrient supplementation in critically ill children. All children received micronutrients when EN was insufficient (<80 % energy requirements). Blood samples were obtained on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admission. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used to measure zinc, selenium, and copper in plasma and selenium, copper, and magnesium in RBCs. Plasma magnesium was measured with colorimetric detection. Micronutrient concentrations were compared with age-specific reference values in healthy children and expressed using Z-scores. Changes in micronutrient concentrations over time were examined using the Friedman and post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: For 67 critically ill children, median (Q1; Q3) age 9.5 (5.5; 13.2) years, PIM3 score -2.3 (-3.1; -0.8), samples were available at various time points during their PICU stay. For 22 patients, longitudinal samples were available. On day 1, the median plasma Z-score for zinc was -5.2 (-5.2; -2.9), copper -1.6 (-2.9; -0.2), selenium -2.6 (-3.8; -1.0), magnesium -0.2 (-1.6; 1.3), and median RBC Z-score for copper was 0.5 (-0.1; 1.3), selenium -0.3 (-1.1; 0.7), magnesium 0.2 (-0.4; 1.3). In the longitudinal analysis, plasma zinc was significantly higher on day 5 (Z-score -3.2 (-4.6; -1.4)) than on day 1 (Z-score -5.2 (-5.2; -3.0), p = 0.032), and plasma magnesium was significantly higher on day 3 (Z-score 1.1 (-0.7; 4.0)) than on day 1 (Z-score -0.3 (-1.6; 0.5), p = 0.018). Plasma copper and selenium remained stable, and the RBC concentrations of all micronutrients remained stable during the first five days. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients had low plasma zinc, copper and selenium concentrations in the first week of their PICU stay, whereas they had normal to high RBC concentrations. More research is needed to examine the relationships between micronutrients and clinical outcome.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinimetric properties of the core outcome measurement instruments for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness (CONCISE).

BACKGROUND: CONCISE is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults. Clinicians and researchers need to be aware of the clinimetric properties of these instruments and understand any limitations to ensure valid and reliable research. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the measurement instruments identified in CONCISE. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2022 (MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, CINAHL via Healthcare Databases Advanced Search, CENTRAL via Cochrane). Studies were included if they examined at least one clinimetric property of a CONCISE measurement instrument or recognised variation in adults ≥ 18 years with critical illness or recovering from critical illness in any language. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures was used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in line with COSMIN guidance. The COSMIN checklist was used to evaluate the risk of bias and the quality of clinimetric properties. Overall certainty of the evidence was rated using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Narrative synthesis was performed and where possible, meta-analysis was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 4316 studies were screened. Forty-seven were included in the review, reporting data for 12308 participants. The Short Form-36 Questionnaire (Physical Component Score and Physical Functioning), sit-to-stand test, 6-m walk test and Barthel Index had the strongest clinimetric properties and certainty of evidence. The Short Physical Performance Battery, Katz Index and handgrip strength had less favourable results. There was limited data for Lawson Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. The risk of bias ranged from inadequate to very good. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to high. CONCLUSIONS: Variable evidence exists to support the clinimetric properties of the CONCISE measurement instruments. We suggest using this review alongside CONCISE to guide outcome selection for future trials of nutrition and metabolic interventions in critical illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023438187). Registered 21/06/2023.

Early hypophosphatemia in critically ill children and the effect of parenteral nutrition: A secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC RCT.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hypophosphatemia during critical illness has been associated with adverse outcome. The reintroduction of enteral or parenteral nutrition, leading to refeeding hypophosphatemia (RFH), has been presented as potential risk factor. We investigated the occurrence of early RFH, its association with clinical outcome, and the impact of early parenteral nutrition (PN) on the development of early RFH in pediatric critical illness. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC randomized controlled trial (N = 1440), which showed that withholding supplemental parenteral nutrition (PN) for 1 week (late-PN) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) accelerated recovery and reduced new infections compared to early-PN (<24 h). Patients with renal replacement therapy or unavailable phosphate concentrations were excluded from this analysis. Early RFH was defined as serum/plasma phosphate <0.65 mmol/L and a drop of >0.16 mmol/L within 3 days of admission to the PICU. The association between baseline characteristics and early RFH, and the association of early RFH with clinical outcome were investigated using logistic and linear regression models, both uncorrected and corrected for possible confounders. To examine the impact of nutritional intake on phosphate concentrations, structural nested mean models with propensity score and censoring models were used. RESULTS: A total of 1247 patients were eligible (618 early-PN, 629 late-PN). Early RFH occurred in 40 patients (3%) in total, significantly more in the early-PN group (n = 31, within-group occurrence 5%) than in the late-PN-group (n = 9, within-group occurrence 1%, p < 0.001). Patients who were older (OR 1.14 (95% CI 1.08; 1.21) per year added, p < 0.001) and who had a higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PIM3) score had a higher risk of developing early RFH (OR 1.36 (95% CI 1.15; 1.59) per unit added, p < 0.001), whereas patients in the late-PN group had a lower risk of early RFH (OR 0.24 (95% CI 0.10; 0.49), p < 0.001). Early RFH was significantly associated with a 56% longer PICU stay (p = 0.003) and 42% longer hospital stay (p = 0.007), but not with new infections (OR 2.01 (95% CI 0.90; 4.30), p = 0.08) or length of mechanical ventilatory support (OR 1.05 (95% CI -3.92; 6.03), p = 0.68), when adjusted for possible confounders. Increase of parenteral nutrition intake (in % kcal of predicted resting energy expenditure) decreased phosphate concentrations (c = -0.002 (95% CI -0.002; -0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early RFH occurred in 3% of critically ill children. Patients randomized to late-PN had a lower chance of developing early RFH, which may be explained by the more gradual build-up of nutrition. As early RFH might impact recovery, it is important to closely monitor phosphate concentrations in patients, especially of those at risk for early RFH.

Core outcome measures for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness: an international modified Delphi consensus study evaluation (CONCISE).

BACKGROUND: Clinical research on nutritional and metabolic interventions in critically ill patients is heterogenous regarding time points, outcomes and measurement instruments used, impeding intervention development and data syntheses, and ultimately worsening clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify and develop a set of core outcome domains and associated measurement instruments to include in all research in critically ill patients. METHODS: An updated systematic review informed a two-stage modified Delphi consensus process (domains followed by instruments). Measurement instruments for domains considered 'essential' were taken through the second stage of the Delphi and a subsequent consensus meeting. RESULTS: In total, 213 participants (41 patients/caregivers, 50 clinical researchers and 122 healthcare professionals) from 24 countries contributed. Consensus was reached on time points (30 and 90 days post-randomisation). Three domains were considered 'essential' at 30 days (survival, physical function and Infection) and five at 90 days (survival, physical function, activities of daily living, nutritional status and muscle/nerve function). Core 'essential' measurement instruments reached consensus for survival and activities of daily living, and 'recommended' measurement instruments for physical function, nutritional status and muscle/nerve function. No consensus was reached for a measurement instrument for Infection. Four further domains met criteria for 'recommended,' but not 'essential,' to measure at 30 days post-randomisation (organ dysfunction, muscle/nerve function, nutritional status and wound healing) and three at 90 days (frailty, body composition and organ dysfunction). CONCLUSION: The CONCISE core outcome set is an internationally agreed minimum set of outcomes for use at 30 and 90 days post-randomisation, in nutritional and metabolic clinical research in critically ill adults.

Impact of supplemental parenteral nutrition early during critical illness on invasive fungal infections: a secondary analysis of the EPaNIC randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: In the EPaNIC RCT (N=4640), postponing the administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) to beyond 1 week in the intensive care unit (ICU) (late-PN) reduced the number of ICU-acquired infections and the costs for antimicrobial drugs compared with initiation of PN within 24-48 hours of admission (early-PN). In a secondary analysis, we hypothesize that late-PN reduces the odds to acquire an invasive fungal infection (IFI) in the ICU. METHODS: The impact of late-PN (N=2328) versus early-PN (N=2312) on acquired IFI and on the likelihood to acquire an IFI over time was assessed in univariable and multivariable analyses. Subsequently, we performed multivariable analyses to assess the effect of the mean total daily administered calories from admission until day 3, day 5, and day 7 on the likelihood over time of acquiring an IFI. RESULTS: Fewer late-PN patients acquired an IFI compared with early-PN patients (77/2328 versus 112/2312) (p 0.008). After adjusting for risk factors, the odds to acquire an IFI and the likelihood of acquiring an IFI at any time were lower in late-PN (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90, p 0.009; adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93, p 0.02). Larger caloric amounts from admission until day 7 were associated with a higher likelihood to acquire an IFI over time (HRadj 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16, p 0.009). CONCLUSION: Postponing PN to beyond 1 week and smaller caloric amounts until day 7 in the ICU reduced ICU-acquired IFIs and the likelihood to develop an IFI over time.

Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines

PURPOSE: To provide evidence-based guidelines for early enteral nutrition (EEN) during critical illness. METHODS: We aimed to compare EEN vs. early parenteral nutrition (PN) and vs. delayed EN. We defined "early" EN as EN started within 48 h independent of type or amount. We listed, a priori, conditions in which EN is often delayed, and performed systematic reviews in 24 such subtopics. If sufficient evidence was available, we performed meta-analyses; if not, we qualitatively summarized the evidence and based our recommendations on expert opinion. We used the GRADE approach for guideline development. The final recommendations were compiled via Delphi rounds. RESULTS: We formulated 17 recommendations favouring initiation of EEN and seven recommendations favouring delaying EN. We performed five meta-analyses: in unselected critically ill patients, and specifically in traumatic brain injury, severe acute pancreatitis, gastrointestinal (GI) surgery and abdominal trauma. EEN reduced infectious complications in unselected critically ill patients, in patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and after GI surgery. We did not detect any evidence of superiority for early PN or delayed EN over EEN. All recommendations are weak because of the low quality of evidence, with several based only on expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest using EEN in the majority of critically ill under certain precautions. In the absence of evidence, we suggest delaying EN in critically ill patients with uncontrolled shock, uncontrolled hypoxaemia and acidosis, uncontrolled upper GI bleeding, gastric aspirate >500 ml/6 h, bowel ischaemia, bowel obstruction, abdominal compartment syndrome, and high-output fistula without distal feeding access.