Patients' perceptions regarding oral anticoagulation therapy and its effect on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulation clinics have improved the time spent within therapeutic range and decreased hemorrhagic complications and costs in chronic oral anticoagulation. Whether these benefits correlate to patients' quality of life (QOL) remains to be determined. The impact of patients' perceptions about anticoagulation on QOL has not been evaluated. The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively patients' perceptions and quality of life in patients chronically anticoagulated. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the prevalence of positive and negative perceptions about oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) and to identify vulnerable groups. Patients anonymously completed the SF-36 survey and a questionnaire that focused on patients' perceptions of protection from thrombotic complications or fear of haemorrhage due to the anticoagulation. We related those perceptions to the General Health SF-36 score, to the patient's characteristics, the absolute bleeding risk (i.e. intended International Normalized Ratio [INR]), duration of therapy and medical attention. RESULTS: One thousand patients were included and 905 questionnaires evaluated. Most patients felt protected and better since the beginning of therapy (71.5% and 61.5%, respectively). Patient characteristics associated with negative perceptions were; female sex (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.58, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.06-2.36, p = 0.01); patients with less than 1 year of therapy (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.34-3.48, p = 0.006); those not satisfied with medical attention (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.53-5.18, p = 0.0001); and those that modified their lifestyle (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.49-4.91, p = 0.0002). Patients with a lower bleeding risk (INR 2.0-3.0) had more negative perceptions than those with a higher risk. Patients with negative perceptions achieved the lowest score in the SF-36 survey. Haemorrhages did not affect patients' perception or QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions correlated with QOL. We were able to identify patient characteristics associated with poor QOL and thus the group of patients whose negative perceptions most warranted special attention from their clinicians.

[Present and future of oral anticoagulants]. / Presente y futuro de los anticoagulantes orales.

The number of patients under oral anticoagulant therapy has markedly increased lately, mainly due to those with chronic atrial fibrillation. Progress has been made in the control of oral anticoagulation because sensitive and calibrated commercial reagents for prothrombin time have become available. But bleeding is still a problem in these patients. In our experience, the intensity and the duration of the anticoagulant therapy are the most important risk factors for bleeding. The deviation of INR (International Normalized Ratio) can also be associated with higher risk for bleeding. The limitations of oral anticoagulant therapy include frequent laboratory controls for dose adjustment, drug interactions, narrow therapeutic range and the high variability in patient response. These limitations prompted the development of new antithrombotic agents. A number of low molecular weight active site inhibitors of thrombin are being developed and one of them is orally bioavailable, and could become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists.

Bleeding risk factors in chronic oral anticoagulation with acenocoumarol.

We studied major bleeding complications, death related to hemorrhage, and tried to identify predisposing factors for bleeding in outpatients treated with acenocoumarol. We evaluated 811 outpatients attending a specialized anticoagulant therapy unit. The intended INR range was 3.5-4.5 for mechanical heart valve replacement (N= 384) and 2.0-3.0 for other indications (N= 427). The variability of INR for the total follow-up and the 2 months before the hemorrhage was calculated. The total follow-up was 1,963.26 years with 27,321 control tests. We observed 47 major bleeding episodes, including 2 fatal (central nervous system hemorrhages), in 37 patients. 49.5% of the patients had underlying diseases. The rate of major and fatal hemorrhage was 2.39 and 0.10 episodes per 100 patients year, respectively. Hemorrhagic complications were more frequently observed in patients with a more intense intended range (8.2% in the INR 3.5-4.5 group vs. 1.5% in the 2.0-3.0 INR group). The risk of major bleeding increased in patients with an achieved INR higher than 6 and in those with higher INR variability during follow-up. The estimated probability of bleeding also increased with time: it was 0.102% at 78 months, and at the beginning of therapy it was 0.006% and 0.007% at 1 and 4 months, respectively. The intensity of anticoagulation and the deviation of the INR from the target are the most important risk factors for bleeding in patients taking acenocoumarol. Monitoring the variability of INR can help identifying patients predisposed to bleeding. However, the screening for underlying disease should always be performed.

Presente y futuro de los anticoagulantes orales. / [Present and future of oral anticoagulants]

The number of patients under oral anticoagulant therapy has markedly increased lately, mainly due to those with chronic atrial fibrillation. Progress has been made in the control of oral anticoagulation because sensitive and calibrated commercial reagents for prothrombin time have become available. But bleeding is still a problem in these patients. In our experience, the intensity and the duration of the anticoagulant therapy are the most important risk factors for bleeding. The deviation of INR (International Normalized Ratio) can also be associated with higher risk for bleeding. The limitations of oral anticoagulant therapy include frequent laboratory controls for dose adjustment, drug interactions, narrow therapeutic range and the high variability in patient response. These limitations prompted the development of new antithrombotic agents. A number of low molecular weight active site inhibitors of thrombin are being developed and one of them is orally bioavailable, and could become an alternative to vitamin K antagonists.