Adecuación y calidad de las ecografías abdominales solicitadas por los profesionales de medicina / Acceptability and quality of abdominal ultrasound studies requested by medical professionals

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la adecuación/calidad de las ecografías abdominales solicitadas por médicos de atención primaria de Barcelona, desarrollar una guía para la ecografía y evaluar su impacto en la adecuación. MÉTODOS: Diseño estudio en 2 fases, una descriptiva, retrospectiva, que evalúa la calidad/adecuación de las solicitudes (fase preintervención), y otra que evalúa el impacto en la calidad/adecuación gracias a la guía (fase postintervención). Sujetos: solicitudes de ecografías durante enero-junio del 2010 procedentes de 10 centros de AP y el mismo número de solicitudes provenientes de los mismos centros después de la intervención. Variables. Fase preintervención: motivo de la visita y petición; presencia de orientación diagnóstica; resultado de la ecografía; calidad/adecuación de la solicitud. Intervención: diseño de una guía mediante técnica grupo nominal y difusión de la guía en los mismos centros. Fase postintervención: 3 meses después de la difusión, analizar el mismo número de solicitudes evaluando las mismas variables que en la fase preintervención. RESULTADOS: Fase preintervención, 1.063 solicitudes, 52,4% mujeres, edad media 52±16 años (rango 11-94). Fase postintervención, 1.060 solicitudes, 57,6% mujeres, edad 54±17 años (rango 6-91). Principales motivos de petición: dolor abdominal/molestias 38,3% (preintervención) y 43,1% (postintervención). Orientación diagnóstica en el 14,5% (preintervención) y el 40,8% (postintervención). Resultado de ecografía normal en el 46,0% (preintervención) y el 42,3% (postintervención). Calidad de las solicitudes buena en el 42,7% (preintervención) y el 46,5% (postintervención). Adecuación de ecografía del 70,5% (preintervención) y del 94,1% (postintervención). A mayor calidad de la solicitud, mejor adecuación y mayor presencia de patología. CONCLUSIONES: La guía de la ecografía mejora la calidad de las solicitudes, la orientación diagnóstica y su adecuación

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability/quality of abdominal ultrasound studies requested by primary care physicians in Barcelona; to develop ultrasound guidelines and assess their impact on acceptability. METHODS: Desing 2-phase study, one retrospective, descriptive phase evaluating the acceptability/quality of requests (pre-intervention phase) and another to assess the impact of guidelines on acceptability/quality (post-intervention phase). Subjects: Requests for ultrasound studies from January-June 2010 from 10 primary care centers and the same number of requests from the same centers after the intervention. Variables. Pre-intervention phase: reason for consultation and request; presence of diagnostic orientation; results of ultrasound; acceptability/quality of the request. Intervention: design guidelines using the nominal group technique, dissemination of guidelines in the same centers. Post-intervention phase: three months after dissemination analyze the same number of requests assessing the same variables included in the pre-intervention phase. RESULTS: Pre-intervention phase: 1,063 requests, 52.4% women, mean age 52±16 years (range 11-94). Post-intervention phase: 1,060 requests, 57.6% women, mean age 54±17 years (range 6-91). Main reasons for requests: abdominal pain/discomfort 38.3% (pre-intervention) and 43.1% (post-intervention). Diagnostic orientation in 14.5% (pre-intervention) and 40.8% (post-intervention). Normal ultrasound results in 46.0% (pre-intervention) and 42.3% (post-intervention). Good quality of requests in 42.7% (pre-intervention) and 46.5% (post-intervention). Acceptability of ultrasound: 70.5% (pre-intervention) and 94.1% (post-intervention). The better the quality of the request, the better the acceptability of the studies and the greater the number of pathological conditions identified. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for ultrasound improve the quality of requests, diagnostic orientation and acceptability of the studies

[Acceptability and quality of abdominal ultrasound studies requested by medical professionals]. / Adecuación y calidad de las ecografías abdominales solicitadas por los profesionales de medicina.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the acceptability/quality of abdominal ultrasound studies requested by primary care physicians in Barcelona; to develop ultrasound guidelines and assess their impact on acceptability. DESIGN: 2-phase study, one retrospective, descriptive phase evaluating the acceptability/quality of requests (pre-intervention phase) and another to assess the impact of guidelines on acceptability/quality (post-intervention phase). SUBJECTS: Requests for ultrasound studies from January-June 2010 from 10 primary care centers and the same number of requests from the same centers after the intervention. VARIABLES: Pre-intervention phase: reason for consultation and request; presence of diagnostic orientation; results of ultrasound; acceptability/quality of the request. INTERVENTION: design guidelines using the nominal group technique, dissemination of guidelines in the same centers. Post-intervention phase: three months after dissemination analyze the same number of requests assessing the same variables included in the pre-intervention phase. RESULTS: Pre-intervention phase: 1,063 requests, 52.4% women, mean age 52±16years (range 11-94). Post-intervention phase: 1,060 requests, 57.6% women, mean age 54±17years (range 6-91). Main reasons for requests: abdominal pain/discomfort 38.3% (pre-intervention) and 43.1% (post-intervention). Diagnostic orientation in 14.5% (pre-intervention) and 40.8% (post-intervention). Normal ultrasound results in 46.0% (pre-intervention) and 42.3% (post-intervention). Good quality of requests in 42.7% (pre-intervention) and 46.5% (post-intervention). Acceptability of ultrasound: 70.5% (pre-intervention) and 94.1% (post-intervention). The better the quality of the request, the better the acceptability of the studies and the greater the number of pathological conditions identified. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for ultrasound improve the quality of requests, diagnostic orientation and acceptability of the studies.

Adequacy and quality of abdominal echographies requested by primary care professionals.

BACKGROUND: The value of abdominal echography in primary care is great because it is innocuous, inexpensive, easy to perform and provides a great deal of information making this the first examination to be requested in cases of probable abdominal disease. However, too many abdominal echographies are probably requested overcrowding the Departments of Radiodiagnosis with not always justified petitions or with repetition of tests based on little clinical criteria. METHODS/DESIGN: The aim of the study is to evaluate the adequacy and quality of abdominal echographies requested by primary care physicians in the Maresme County (North of Barcelona), develop guidelines for indicating echographies and reevaluate this adequacy after implementing these guidelines.We will perform a two-phase study: the first descriptive, and retrospective evaluating the adequacy and quality of petitions for abdominal echographies, and in the second phase we will evaluate the impact of recommendations for indicating abdominal echographies for PC physicians on the adequacy and quality of echography petitions thereafter.This study will be carried out in 10 primary care centres in the Maresme (Barcelona).1067 abdominal echographies requested by primary care physicians from the above mentioned centres from January 2007 to April 2010 and referred to the Department of Radiology and the same number of applications after the intervention.All the petitions for abdominal echographies requested will be analysed and the clinical histories will be obtained to determine demographic variables, the reason for the visit and for the echography petition and diagnostic orientation, clinical and echographic data, evaluation of the echographies according to the quality and variables characterising the professionals requesting the echographies including: age, sex, laboral situation, length of time in work post, formation, etc.To achieve a consensus of the adequacy of abdominal echography, a work group including gastroenterologists, radiologists and general practitioners will be created following the nominal group. This will allow the design of guidelines for the indication of abdominal echography and posterior evaluation of their impact among physicians by diffusion and posterior reevaluation of the adequacy of the petitions.

Prevalence and factors associated with the presence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in an adult population in Spain.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is unknown in Spain. The purpose of detecting NAFLD patients is to determine the associated factors and prevent its evolution to more severe forms. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and factors associated with NAFLD. METHODS: This is a multicentre, cross-sectional, populational study. Individuals between 15 and 85 years of age were randomly selected from 25 primary healthcare centres in the province of Barcelona, Spain. Clinical histories were reviewed, and anamnesis, physical examination, blood analysis and hepatic echography were performed. Individuals with an alcohol intake greater than 30 g/day in men and greater than 20 g/day in women or with known liver disease were excluded. RESULTS: Seven hundred and sixty-six individuals with a mean age of 53+/-14 years (range 17-83, 42.2% men) were included in the study. One hundred and ninety-eight individuals presented NAFLD with echographic criteria (prevalence 25.8, 33.4% men and 20.3% women P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the following were associated with NAFLD: male sex [odds ratio (OR): 2.34, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.57-3.49], age (OR: 1.04 per year, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05), metabolic syndrome (OR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.29-3.72), insulin resistance (OR: 6.00, 95% CI: 3.43-10.5) and alanine aminotransferase (OR: 4.21, 95% CI: 2.23-7.95). Of the individuals who consumed alcohol, 29.4% consumed alcohol within the inclusion criteria, with a mean of 9.17+/-6.75 standard beverage units per week. Moderate alcohol intake was not related to NAFLD, although a possible protector effect was found with the quantity consumed among the drinkers who did not consume excessive amounts of alcohol (OR: 0.93 per standard beverage units, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98). CONCLUSION: NAFLD prevalence in our population is very high. Male sex, age, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and alanine aminotransferase are the factors associated with NAFLD. Furthermore, studies should be carried out with respect to the controversial effect of alcohol on NAFLD.

Risk factors associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in subjects from primary care units. A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL) consists in the accumulation of fat vacuoles in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes. Many etiologic factors are associated with NAFL, such as, the metabolic syndrome factors, medications, bariatric surgery, nutritional disorders. However, very little information is available on the clinical relevance of this disorder as a health problem in the general population. METHODS AND DESIGN: The aim of the study is establish the risk factors most frequently associated with NAFL in a general adult population assigned to the primary care units and to investigate the relationship between each component of the metabolic syndrome and the risk of having a NAFL. A population based case-control, observational and multicenter study will be carried out in 18 primary care units from the "Area de Gestión del Barcelonés Nord y Maresme" (Barcelona) attending a population of 360,000 inhabitants and will include 326 cases and 370 controls. Cases are defined as all subjects fulfilling the inclusion criteria and with evidence of fatty liver in an abdominal ultrasonography performed for any reason. One control will be randomly selected for each case from the population, matched for age, gender and primary care center. Controls with fatty liver or other liver diseases will be excluded. All cases and controls will be asked about previous hepatic diseases, consumption of alcohol, smoking and drugs, and a physical examination, biochemical analyses including liver function tests, the different components of the metabolic syndrome and the HAIR score will also be performed. Paired controls will also undergo an abdominal ultrasonography. DISCUSSION: This study will attempt to determine the factors most frequently associated with the presence of NAFL investigate the relationship between the metabolic syndrome and the risk of fatty liver and study the influence of the different primary care professionals in avoiding the evolution of the disease.