Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso para la formación y el desarrollo de la ecografía clínica en Medicina Interna: recomendaciones desde el Grupo de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (GTECO-SEMI) / Executive summary of the consensus document for the training and development of clinical ultrasound in internal medicine: Recommendations from the Clinical Ultrasound Working Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (GTECO-SEMI)

Introducción Dada la creciente adopción de la ecografía clínica en medicina, es fundamental estandarizar su aplicación, su formación y su investigación. Objetivos y métodos El propósito de este documento es proporcionar recomendaciones de consenso para responder cuestiones sobre la práctica y el funcionamiento de las unidades de ecografía clínica. Participaron 19 expertos y responsables de unidades avanzadas de ecografía clínica. Se utilizó un método de consenso Delphi modificado. Resultados Se consideraron un total de 137 declaraciones de consenso, basadas en la evidencia y en la opinión experta. Las declaraciones fueron distribuidas en 10 áreas. Un total de 99 recomendaciones alcanzaron consenso. Conclusiones Este consenso define los aspectos más importantes de la ecografía clínica en el ámbito de la Medicina Interna, con el objetivo de homogeneizar y promover este avance asistencial en sus diferentes vertientes. El documento ha sido elaborado por el Grupo de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica y avalado por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna. (AU)

Introduction Given the increasing adoption of clinical ultrasound in medicine, it is essential to standardize its application, training, and research. Objectives and methods The purpose of this document is to provide consensus recommendations to address questions about the practice and operation of clinical ultrasound units. Nineteen experts and leaders from advanced clinical ultrasound units participated. A modified Delphi consensus method was used. Results A total of 137 consensus statements, based on evidence and expert opinion, were considered. The statements were distributed across 10 areas, and 99 recommendations achieved consensus. Conclusions This consensus defines the most important aspects of clinical ultrasound in the field of internal medicine, with the aim of standardizing and promoting this healthcare advancement in its various aspects. The document has been prepared by the Clinical Ultrasound Working Group and endorsed by the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. (AU)

Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso para la formación y el desarrollo de la ecografía clínica en Medicina Interna: recomendaciones desde el Grupo de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (GTECO-SEMI) / Executive summary of the consensus document for the training and development of clinical ultrasound in internal medicine: Recommendations from the Clinical Ultrasound Working Group of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (GTECO-SEMI)

Introducción Dada la creciente adopción de la ecografía clínica en medicina, es fundamental estandarizar su aplicación, su formación y su investigación. Objetivos y métodos El propósito de este documento es proporcionar recomendaciones de consenso para responder cuestiones sobre la práctica y el funcionamiento de las unidades de ecografía clínica. Participaron 19 expertos y responsables de unidades avanzadas de ecografía clínica. Se utilizó un método de consenso Delphi modificado. Resultados Se consideraron un total de 137 declaraciones de consenso, basadas en la evidencia y en la opinión experta. Las declaraciones fueron distribuidas en 10 áreas. Un total de 99 recomendaciones alcanzaron consenso. Conclusiones Este consenso define los aspectos más importantes de la ecografía clínica en el ámbito de la Medicina Interna, con el objetivo de homogeneizar y promover este avance asistencial en sus diferentes vertientes. El documento ha sido elaborado por el Grupo de Trabajo de Ecografía Clínica y avalado por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna. (AU)

Introduction Given the increasing adoption of clinical ultrasound in medicine, it is essential to standardize its application, training, and research. Objectives and methods The purpose of this document is to provide consensus recommendations to address questions about the practice and operation of clinical ultrasound units. Nineteen experts and leaders from advanced clinical ultrasound units participated. A modified Delphi consensus method was used. Results A total of 137 consensus statements, based on evidence and expert opinion, were considered. The statements were distributed across 10 areas, and 99 recommendations achieved consensus. Conclusions This consensus defines the most important aspects of clinical ultrasound in the field of internal medicine, with the aim of standardizing and promoting this healthcare advancement in its various aspects. The document has been prepared by the Clinical Ultrasound Working Group and endorsed by the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. (AU)

Papel del Doppler de la vena femoral en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico prospectivo / Role of the femoral vein doppler in acute heart failure patients: results from a prospective multicentric study

Antecedentes y objetivo El objetivo de nuestro estudio es definir el papel de la ecografía Doppler pulsada (PW-Doppler) de la vena femoral común en la evaluación de la dilatación de la vena cava inferior (VCI), la probabilidad de hipertensión pulmonar, la insuficiencia tricuspídea y la excursión sistólica del plano anular tricuspídeo (TAPSE). Métodos Se trata de un estudio prospectivo en dos hospitales en 74 pacientes ingresados con insuficiencia cardiaca aguda. Se realizó ecografía PW-Doppler de vena femoral común, ecocardiografía y evaluación de la VCI en el momento del ingreso, así como PW-Doppler y ecografía de VCI al alta hospitalaria. Resultados La detección de un flujo pulsátil (138 exploraciones) tuvo una curva ROC excelente para la detección de VCI mayor de 2cm (AUC 0,931, Sn95%, Sp 90%, VPP 93%, VPN 94%) con una odds ratio (OR) de 211,2 (intervalo de confianza del 95% 48,13-926,72). La pulsatilidad del flujo también tuvo el mayor rendimiento en la detección de la hipertensión pulmonar (AUC 0,8, Sn 95%, Sp 64%, VPP 84%, VPN 84%) y en la detección de la insuficiencia tricuspídea moderada-grave (AUC 0,79, Sn 95%, Sp 67%, VPP 88%, VPN 78%). Si el flujo es continuo, podemos descartar razonablemente una disminución del TAPSE (VPN 89%). Conclusión La detección del flujo PW-Doppler de vena femoral común puede ser una ventana alternativa para la detección de una dilatación de la VCI de 2cm, TR significativa y la probabilidad de hipertensión pulmonar elevada en la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda. También permite descartar razonablemente la disfunción del ventrículo derecho en casos de normalidad en estos pacientes (AU)

Background and objective The aim of our study is to define the role of Pulsed-Doppler (PW-Doppler) Ultrasound of the common femoral vein in the assessment of dilatation Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), probability of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), and Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Methods This is a prospective two-hospital study in 74 patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF). We performed PW-Doppler ultrasound of the common femoral vein, Point of Care cardiac ultrasonography and assessment of the IVC at the time of admission, as well as PW-Doppler and ultrasound of the IVC at hospital discharge. Results The detection of a pulsatile flow (138 scans) had an excellent ROC curve for the detection of IVC greater than 2cm (AUC 0.931, Sn 95%, Sp 90%, PPV 93%, NPV 94%) with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 211.2 (95% confidence interval 48.13-926.72). The pulsatility of the flow also had the highest performance in the detection of PH (AUC 0.8, Sn 95%, Sp 64%, PPV 84%, NPV 84%) and in the detection of moderate-severe TR (AUC 0.79, Sn 95%, Sp 67%, PPV 88%, NPV 78%). If the flow is continuous, we can reasonably rule out diminished TAPSE (NPV 89%). Conclussion Detection of PW-Doppler flow of the common femoral vein may be an alternative window for the detection of an IVC dilation of 2cm, significant TR, and the likelihood of high PH in acute heart failure. It also allows us to reasonably rule out dysfunction of the right ventricle in cases of normality in these patients (AU)

Role of the femoral vein doppler in acute heart failure patients: results from a prospective multicentric study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to define the role of Pulsed-Doppler (PW-Doppler) Ultrasound of the Common Femoral Vein (CFV) in the assessment of dilatation Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), probability of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), and Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). METHODS: This is a prospective two-hospital study in 74 patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF). We performed PW-Doppler ultrasound of the common femoral vein, Point of Care (POC) cardiac ultrasonography and assessment of the IVC at the time of admission, as well as PW-Doppler and ultrasound of the IVC at hospital discharge. RESULTS: The detection of a pulsatile flow (138 scans) had an excellent ROC curve for the detection of IVC greater than 2cm (AUC 0.931, Sn 95%, Sp 90%, PPV 93%, NPV 94%) with an Odds Ratio (OR) of 211.2 (95% confidence interval 48.13-926.72). The pulsatility of the flow also had the highest performance in the detection of PH (AUC 0.8, Sn 95%, Sp 64%, PPV 84%, NPV 84%) and in the detection of moderate-severe TR (AUC 0.79, Sn 95%, Sp 67%, PPV 88%, NPV 78%). If the flow is continuous, we can reasonably rule out diminished TAPSE (NPV 89%). CONCLUSSION: Detection of PW-Doppler flow of the CFV may be an alternative window for the detection of an IVC dilation of 2cm, significant TR, and the likelihood of high PH in acute heart failure. It also allows us to reasonably rule out dysfunction of the right ventricle in cases of normality in these patients.

Prevalencia de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en pacientes con alto riesgo cardiovascular / Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with high cardiovascular risk

Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de aneurisma de aorta abdominal (AAA), definido por un diámetro arterial ≥30mm, en pacientes con alto o muy alto riesgo cardiovascular (RCV) y evaluar sus características clínicas. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio observacional, transversal y multicéntrico realizado en servicios de Medicina Interna del país a varones con edad >55años y mujeres >65años que tenían un RCV alto o muy alto reclutados durante 24meses. Resultados: Se incluyeron 659 pacientes. La prevalencia de AAA fue del 8% (53 pacientes). El 76,9% fueron varones, con edad media de 71±8,7años. El análisis multivariante demostró asociación entre AAA y la edad (OR: 1,06; IC95%: 1,02-1,1; p<0,01), el sexo masculino (OR: 5,6; IC95%: 1,6-18,8; p=0,01), el tabaquismo activo (OR: 3,22; IC95%: 1,16-8,93; p=0,024) y la arteriopatía periférica (OR: 3,51; IC95%: 1,73-7,09; p<0,01), siendo la diabetes mellitus un factor protector independiente (OR: 0,41; IC95%: 0,22-0,78; p=0,06). Los pacientes con dilatación subaneurismática de la aorta (diámetro de la aorta abdominal 25-29,9mm) presentaban similares características que los pacientes con AAA. Conclusiones: La prevalencia de AAA en pacientes de alto RCV es elevada. El cribado ecográfico puede ser realizado por médicos generalistas. Pueden beneficiarse de un cribado oportunista los varones de más de 65años, con RCV elevado, especialmente si presentan tabaquismo activo o arteriopatía periférica

Background: To determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (arterial diameter ≥30mm), in patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) and to evaluate their clinical features. Patients and methods: Observational, cross-sectional and multicentric study conducted in Spanish Internal Medicine Services. We enrolled men with age >55years and women >65years who had a high or very high CVR. Results: The study included 659 patients. The prevalence of AAA was 8% (53 patients). 76.9% were male with a mean age of 71±8.7years. The multivariate analysis showed an association between AAA and age (OR: 1.06; 95%CI: 1.02-1.1; P<.01), male sex (OR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.6-18.8; P=.01), active smoking (OR: 3.22; 95%CI: 1.16-8.93; P=.024) and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 1.73-7.09; P<.01). Diabetes mellitus was an independent protective factor (OR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.22-0.78; P=.06). Those with subaneurysmal dilatation of the abdominal aorta (diameter 25-29.9mm) presented similar features as patients with AAA. Conclusions: The prevalence of AAA in patients with high CVR is high. Ultrasound screening can be performed by general practitioners. Men >65years with elevated CVR could benefit, particularly in the presence of active smoking or peripheral arterial disease

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with high cardiovascular risk. / Prevalencia de aneurisma de aorta abdominal en pacientes con alto riesgo cardiovascular.

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (arterial diameter ≥30mm), in patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk (CVR) and to evaluate their clinical features. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional and multicentric study conducted in Spanish Internal Medicine Services. We enrolled men with age >55years and women >65years who had a high or very high CVR. RESULTS: The study included 659 patients. The prevalence of AAA was 8% (53 patients). 76.9% were male with a mean age of 71±8.7years. The multivariate analysis showed an association between AAA and age (OR: 1.06; 95%CI: 1.02-1.1; P<.01), male sex (OR: 5.6; 95%CI: 1.6-18.8; P=.01), active smoking (OR: 3.22; 95%CI: 1.16-8.93; P=.024) and peripheral arterial disease (OR: 3.51; 95%CI: 1.73-7.09; P<.01). Diabetes mellitus was an independent protective factor (OR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.22-0.78; P=.06). Those with subaneurysmal dilatation of the abdominal aorta (diameter 25-29.9mm) presented similar features as patients with AAA. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AAA in patients with high CVR is high. Ultrasound screening can be performed by general practitioners. Men >65years with elevated CVR could benefit, particularly in the presence of active smoking or peripheral arterial disease.

Enseñanza de las bases de la ecocardioscopia en el pregrado: los estudiantes como mentores / Teaching the basics of echocardiography in the undergraduate: students as mentors

Objetivo. Analizar la capacidad de los alumnos de Medicina para integrarse en la enseñanza práctica de los planos básicos en ecocardioscopia mediante un diseño de mentoría paritaria. Metodología. Treinta y seis alumnos de Medicina previamente adiestrados en la obtención de planos en ecocardioscopia (mentores) enseñaron al resto de alumnos de 5.o curso (n=126). La metodología docente incluyó 3 etapas: teoría (curso online), entrenamiento básico (3 sesiones con 15h de experiencia práctica en ultrasonidos y un mínimo de 20 estudios ecocardiográficos por mentor) y evaluación clínica objetiva estructurada (ECOE) en la que se puntuaba la adecuación de los planos ecográficos básicos y la correcta identificación de 16 estructuras cardiacas. Resultados. La puntuación media ponderada obtenida por los alumnos en la ECOE fue de 8,66±1,98 puntos (sobre un máximo de 10). Solo 10 alumnos (8,4%) obtuvieron una puntuación inferior a 5 y 15 (12,6%) inferior a 7. Cincuenta alumnos (42%) obtuvieron 10 puntos. La estructura más fácilmente identificada fue el ventrículo izquierdo en el plano paraesternal eje corto, con un 89,9% de respuestas correctas. La estructura peor identificada fue la válvula mitral en el plano subxifoideo, con un 69,7% de respuestas correctas. Conclusiones. La enseñanza basada en la mentoría paritaria consigue un nivel de entrenamiento adecuado en la obtención de planos básicos en la ecocardioscopia. El periodo de formación es relativamente corto. El sistema de mentoría paritaria puede facilitar la implantación de la enseñanza sobre aspectos básicos en ultrasonidos a un elevado número de alumnos de pregrado (AU)

Objective. To analyse the ability of medical students to incorporate the practical teaching of basic echocardiography planes using a peer mentoring design. Methodology. Thirty-six medical students previously trained in obtaining echocardiography planes (mentors) taught the other 5th-year students (n=126). The teaching methodology included three stages: theory (online course), basic training (three 15h sessions of practical experience in ultrasound and at least 20 echocardiographic studies per mentor) and objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA), which scored the appropriateness of the basic ultrasound planes and the correct identification of 16 cardiac structures. Results. The students’ weighted mean score in the OSCA was 8.66±1.98 points (out of 10). Only 10 students (8.4%) scored less than 5, and 15 (12.6%) scored less than 7. Fifty students (42%) scored 10 points. The most easily identified structure was the left ventricle in the short-axis parasternal plane, with 89.9% of correct answers. The most poorly identified structure was the mitral valve in the subxiphoid plane, with 69.7% of correct answers. Conclusions. Peer mentoring-based teaching achieves an appropriate level of training in obtaining basic echocardiography planes. The training period is relatively short. The peer mentoring system can facilitate the implementation of teaching on basic aspects of ultrasound to a large number of undergraduate students (AU)

Teaching the basics of echocardiography in the undergraduate: Students as mentors. / Enseñanza de las bases de la ecocardioscopia en el pregrado: los estudiantes como mentores.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the ability of medical students to incorporate the practical teaching of basic echocardiography planes using a peer mentoring design. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-six medical students previously trained in obtaining echocardiography planes (mentors) taught the other 5th-year students (n=126). The teaching methodology included three stages: theory (online course), basic training (three 15h sessions of practical experience in ultrasound and at least 20 echocardiographic studies per mentor) and objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA), which scored the appropriateness of the basic ultrasound planes and the correct identification of 16 cardiac structures. RESULTS: The students' weighted mean score in the OSCA was 8.66±1.98 points (out of 10). Only 10 students (8.4%) scored less than 5, and 15 (12.6%) scored less than 7. Fifty students (42%) scored 10 points. The most easily identified structure was the left ventricle in the short-axis parasternal plane, with 89.9% of correct answers. The most poorly identified structure was the mitral valve in the subxiphoid plane, with 69.7% of correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: Peer mentoring-based teaching achieves an appropriate level of training in obtaining basic echocardiography planes. The training period is relatively short. The peer mentoring system can facilitate the implementation of teaching on basic aspects of ultrasound to a large number of undergraduate students.

Enseñanza de la ecografía clínica en el pregrado: los estudiantes como mentores / Teaching of clinical ultrasonography to undergraduates: students as mentors

Introducción: La ecografía es una técnica diagnóstica por imagen muy útil que complementa la exploración física tradicional. Objetivo: Demostrar que estudiantes previamente formados en ecografía clínica son capaces de instruir a otros estudiantes de forma similar en un corto periodo de tiempo («mentoría paritaria»). Metodología: Cinco estudiantes de medicina de 5.° curso formados en ecografía abdominal y cardiaca por médicos con experiencia instruyeron con el mismo procedimiento a otros 24 estudiantes. La formación constaba de un curso teórico online y de prácticas de unas 12 horas de duración en las que cada uno de los estudiantes debía realizar 6 planos abdominales y 4 planos cardiacos básicos a 20 voluntarios sanos. Posteriormente, los estudiantes fueron sometidos a una evaluación objetiva sobre modelos sanos realizada por facultativos expertos en ecografía clínica. Resultados: Los alumnos consiguieron identificar correctamente el 90,2% de los planos básicos abdominales, a excepción de los planos coronal izquierdo (bazo y riñón izquierdo) y subcostal (vesícula biliar), con unos porcentajes de éxito ligeramente inferiores, del 82,5 y del 80%, respectivamente. Debido a la mayor dificultad de obtención de los planos cardiacos, el porcentaje de aciertos fue menor: 70,3%, en los planos subxifoideo, paraesternal corto y cuatro cámaras. El plano cardiaco con menor error de identificación fue el paraesternal largo (90% de aciertos). No observamos diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los resultados (capacidad docente) de los distintos mentores. Conclusión: Los estudiantes de medicina son capaces de instruir a otros compañeros (mentoría paritaria) en aspectos básicos de ecografía abdominal y cardiaca tras un periodo de formación relativamente corto (AU)

Background: Ultrasonography is a highly useful diagnostic technique that supplements traditional physical examinations. Objective: To demonstrate that students previously trained in clinical ultrasonography are capable of instructing other students in a similar manner in a short period of time (“peer mentoring”). Methodology: Five medical students in their 5th year, trained in abdominal and cardiac ultrasonography by physicians with experience, instructed 24 other students in the same procedure. The training consisted of an online theoretical course and practical training lasting about 12hours, in which each student had to perform 6 basic abdominal planes and 4 basic cardiac planes on 20 healthy volunteers. Subsequently, the students underwent an objective assessment test on healthy models performed by expert physicians in clinical ultrasonography. Results: The students managed to correctly identify 90.2% of the basic abdominal planes, except for the left coronal (spleen and left kidney) and subcostal (gallbladder) planes, with slightly lower success rates of 82.5% and 80%, respectively. Due to the greater difficulty of obtaining cardiac planes, the success rate was lower: 70.3%, in the subxiphoid, short parasternal and four chamber planes. The cardiac plane with the fewest errors in identification was the parasternal long plane (90% success). We observed no statistically significant differences between the results (teaching capacity) of the various mentors. Conclusion: Medical students are capable of instructing other colleagues (peer mentoring) on the basic aspects of abdominal and cardiac ultrasonography after a relatively short training period (AU)

Teaching of clinical ultrasonography to undergraduates: students as mentors. / Enseñanza de la ecografía clínica en el pregrado: los estudiantes como mentores.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasonography is a highly useful diagnostic technique that supplements traditional physical examinations. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that students previously trained in clinical ultrasonography are capable of instructing other students in a similar manner in a short period of time ("peer mentoring"). METHODOLOGY: Five medical students in their 5th year, trained in abdominal and cardiac ultrasonography by physicians with experience, instructed 24 other students in the same procedure. The training consisted of an online theoretical course and practical training lasting about 12hours, in which each student had to perform 6 basic abdominal planes and 4 basic cardiac planes on 20 healthy volunteers. Subsequently, the students underwent an objective assessment test on healthy models performed by expert physicians in clinical ultrasonography. RESULTS: The students managed to correctly identify 90.2% of the basic abdominal planes, except for the left coronal (spleen and left kidney) and subcostal (gallbladder) planes, with slightly lower success rates of 82.5% and 80%, respectively. Due to the greater difficulty of obtaining cardiac planes, the success rate was lower: 70.3%, in the subxiphoid, short parasternal and four chamber planes. The cardiac plane with the fewest errors in identification was the parasternal long plane (90% success). We observed no statistically significant differences between the results (teaching capacity) of the various mentors. CONCLUSION: Medical students are capable of instructing other colleagues (peer mentoring) on the basic aspects of abdominal and cardiac ultrasonography after a relatively short training period.

Ecografía clínica abdominal y educación médica / Abdominal ultrasound and medical education

Introducción. La ecografía es una técnica muy versátil, que permite en tiempo real visualizar múltiples órganos internos y es de inestimable ayuda para la exploración física de los pacientes. Objetivo. Evaluar si la ecografía puede incorporarse en la enseñanza de la medicina y si los alumnos pueden realizar una exploración ecográfica abdominal básica sin un largo periodo de formación. Metodología. Doce estudiantes de medicina recibieron formación en ecografía abdominal básica durante un programa formativo de 15h de duración, que incluía un curso teórico-práctico de 5h y prácticas supervisadas en 20 pacientes seleccionados. Posteriormente realizamos una prueba de evaluación objetiva en la que valoramos la capacidad de los alumnos para obtener los planos ecográficos y detectar diversas enfermedades en 5 pacientes distintos. Resultados. Los estudiantes fueron capaces de identificar correctamente los planos abdominales en más del 90% de las ocasiones. Solo en el corte subcostal derecho para localizar la vesícula este porcentaje fue inferior (80%). La precisión o eficiencia global de la ecografía para el diagnóstico de los hallazgos patológicos relevantes de los enfermos fue superior al 90% (colelitiasis 91,1%; aneurisma de aorta abdominal 100%; esplenomegalia 98,3%; ascitis 100%; vena cava inferior dilatada 100%, y retención aguda de orina 100%). Conclusión. La ecografía puede ser una herramienta formativa en la enseñanza de la medicina y puede ayudar a los alumnos a mejorar la exploración física (AU)

Introduction. Ultrasound is a very versatile diagnostic modality that permits real-time visualization of multiple internal organs. It is of invaluable help for the physical examination of the patients. Aim. To assess if ultrasound can be incorporated into medical education and if the students can perform a basic abdominal ultrasound examination without the necessity of a long period of training. Methodology. Twelve medical students were trained in basic abdominal ultrasound during a 15-hour training program including a 5-hour theoretical and practical course and supervised practice in 20 selected patients. Subsequently, we conducted an evaluation test that assessed the ability of students to obtain the ultrasound views and to detect various pathologies in five different patients. Results. The students were able to correctly identify the abdominal views more than 90% of the times. This percentage was only lower (80%) in the right subcostal view to locate the gallbladder. The accuracy or global efficiency of the ultrasound for the diagnosis of relevant pathological findings of the patients was greater than 90% (91.1% gallstones, abdominal aortic aneurysm 100%; splenomegaly 98.3%, ascites 100%; dilated inferior vena cava 100%; acute urinary retention 100%). Conclusion. The ultrasound may be a feasible learning tool in medical education. Ultrasound can help students to the improve the physical examination (AU)

Abdominal ultrasound and medical education.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound is a very versatile diagnostic modality that permits real-time visualization of multiple internal organs. It is of invaluable help for the physical examination of the patients. AIM: To assess if ultrasound can be incorporated into medical education and if the students can perform a basic abdominal ultrasound examination without the necessity of a long period of training. METHODOLOGY: Twelve medical students were trained in basic abdominal ultrasound during a 15-h training program including a 5-h theoretical and practical course and supervised practice in 20 selected patients. Subsequently, we conducted an evaluation test that assessed the ability of students to obtain the ultrasound views and to detect various pathologies in five different patients. RESULTS: The students were able to correctly identify the abdominal views more than 90% of the times. This percentage was only lower (80%) in the right subcostal view to locate the gallbladder. The accuracy or global efficiency of the ultrasound for the diagnosis of relevant pathological findings of the patients was greater than 90% (91.1% gallstones, abdominal aortic aneurysm 100%; splenomegaly 98.3%, ascites 100%; dilated inferior vena cava 100%; acute urinary retention 100%). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound may be a feasible learning tool in medical education. Ultrasound can help students to improve the physical examination.

[Imaging tests in acute abdominal pain]. / Pruebas de imagen en el dolor abdominal agudo.

Acute abdominal pain constitutes a diagnostic challenge for the physician. The list of diseases that can cause abdominal pain is very extensive. Some of these conditions may be serious and life-threatening. The medical history is fundamental for the judicious choice of the most suitable diagnostic tests. Plain abdominal x-ray has little diagnostic efficiency although it comprises the initial diagnostic test when perforation of a hollow viscus, intestinal obstruction or ingestion of a foreign body is suspected. Abdominal ultrasound is the test of choice in suspected biliary tract pathology, complicated renal colic and gynaecological disease. Abdominal computed axial tomography (CT) may be the most sensitive and specific imaging test for diagnosing most causes of abdominal pain but should be reserved for selected cases.

Pruebas de imagen en el dolor abdominal agudo / Imaging tests in acute abdominal pain

El dolor abdominal agudo constituye un retodiagnóstico para el médico. La lista deenfermedades que pueden provocar dolor abdominales muy amplia. Algunos de estos procesos puedenser graves y comprometer la vida del paciente.La historia clínica es fundamental para la elecciónjuiciosa de las pruebas diagnósticas más adecuadas.La radiografía simple de abdomen tiene una escasarentabilidad diagnóstica, aunque constituye laprueba diagnóstica inicial cuando se sospecha de laperforación de víscera hueca, obstrucción intestinalo ingestión de un cuerpo extraño. La ecografíaabdominal es la prueba de elección ante laposibilidad de una patología de la vía biliar, cólicorenal complicado o enfermedad ginecológica.La tomografía axial computarizada abdominal esposiblemente la prueba de imagen más sensible yespecífica para el diagnóstico de la mayoría de lascausas de dolor abdominal, pero debe reservarsepara casos seleccionados

challenge for the physician. The list of diseases thatcan cause abdominal pain is very extensive. Some ofthese conditions may be serious and life-threatening.The medical history is fundamental for the judiciouschoice of the most suitable diagnostic tests.Plain abdominal x-ray has little diagnostic efficiencyalthough it comprises the initial diagnostic test whenperforation of a hollow viscus, intestinal obstructionor ingestion of a foreign body is suspected.Abdominal ultrasound is the test of choice insuspected biliary tract pathology, complicatedrenal colic and gynaecological disease. Abdominalcomputed axial tomography (CT) may be the mostsensitive and specific imaging test for diagnosingmost causes of abdominal pain but should bereserved for selected cases