Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(12): e1917626, 2019 12 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851345

RESUMO

Importance: Concussion on university campuses is a significant health problem. Characterizing the incidence of concussion on college campuses may inform education and resource allocation policy at student health care centers. Objectives: To establish a measure of concussion incidence among collegiate undergraduate students and to describe characteristics associated with concussion incidence, including sex, cause, and month. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included data from 3 academic years from August 2015 to April 2018 at a large, public university in the United States. Participants included any undergraduate student or varsity athlete who was diagnosed with at least 1 concussion during the academic year. Exposures: Sport- and non-sport-related activities of undergraduate students. Main Outcomes and Measures: Concussion diagnosis. Results: Among 954 undergraduate students from the general undergraduate population with at least 1 concussion, including 502 men and 452 women, 1020 concussions were diagnosed in 3 academic years. During 2 academic years, a total of 80 concussions occurred among the varsity athlete population, including 26 men and 54 women. Overall, concussion incidence among both the general undergraduate population and varsity athletes was 132.4 (95% CI, 123.2-142.0) concussions per 10 000 students. Men sustained concussions at a rate of 126.1 (95% CI, 114.1-139.0) concussions per 10 000 students and women sustained concussions at a rate of 140.0 (95% CI, 126.2-155.3) concussions per 10 000 students for the 2016 to 2017 and 2017 to 2018 academic years. Concussion incidence peaked in August at the start of the academic year and the rate of non-sport-related concussions (81.0 [95% CI, 73.9-88.7] concussions per 10 000 students for academic years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018) was higher than the rate of sport-related concussions (51.5 [95% CI, 49.5-57.7] concussions per 10 000 students for academic years 2016-2017 and 2017-2018). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found concussions to be common among this US collegiate population. While concussion is often associated with sport, the incidence of non-sport-related concussion was higher than that of sport-related concussion throughout the academic year. Additional research is warranted to determine if this incidence measure among undergraduate students is generalizable to other university populations.


Assuntos
Concussão Encefálica/epidemiologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Traumatismos em Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos em Atletas/epidemiologia , Traumatismos em Atletas/etiologia , Concussão Encefálica/diagnóstico , Concussão Encefálica/etiologia , Colorado/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Universidades , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Am Board Fam Pract ; 17(1): 1-5, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15014046

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although influenza is a commonly encountered condition in primary care, and diagnosis is increasingly important given the availability of new treatments, there has been no systematic review of the evidence on clinical diagnosis. METHODS: This was a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis where appropriate. We included cohort studies and randomized trials that compared the history and physical examination with a reference laboratory test for the diagnosis of influenza A and/or B. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Seven studies reported the sensitivity and specificity for a total of 59 variables. We combined studies of influenza A or B alone with those of influenza A and B. Rigors [likelihood ratio (LR) +7.2], the combination of fever and presenting within 3 days of the onset of illness (LR +4.0), and sweating (LR +3.0) were best at ruling-in influenza when present. When absent, the following decreased the likelihood of influenza: any systemic symptoms (LR -0.36), coughing (LR -0.38), not being able to cope with daily activities (LR -0.39), and being confined to bed (LR -0.50). Cough, nasal congestion, and fever (subjective or objective) had the highest calculable areas under the ROC curve. CONCLUSIONS: Individual signs and symptoms are of limited value for the diagnosis of influenza. Development of clinical decision rules that systematically combine symptoms may be a more useful strategy.


Assuntos
Influenza Humana/diagnóstico , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Funções Verossimilhança , Anamnese , Exame Físico , Curva ROC , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA