Obese teenagers treated by Lap-Band System: the Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about obesity surgery in young and adolescent patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in obese teenagers. METHODS: Patients < or = 19 years old selected from the database of the Italian Collaborative Study Group for Lap-Band were analyzed according to mortality, comorbidities, laparotomic conversion, intra- and postoperative complications, body mass index (BMI), and % excess weight loss (EWL) at different times of follow-up. Data were expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (1.5%) of 3813 patients who underwent operation with the Lap-Band System were < or = 19 years old: 47F/11M; mean age, 17.96 +/- 0.99 years (range, 15-19); mean BMI, 46.1 +/- 6.31 Kg/m2 (range, 34.9 - 69.25); mean % excess weight, 86.4 +/- 27.1 (range, 34 - 226.53). Sixteen (27.5%) of the 58 patients were superobese (BMI > or = 50). In 27/58 (46.5%) patients, 1 or more comorbidities were diagnosed. Mortality was absent. Laparotomic conversion was necessary in 1 patient with gastric perforation on the anterior wall. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 6/58 (10.3%). The band was removed in 6/58 (10.3%) patients for gastric erosion (3 patients), psychologic, intolerance (2 patients), and in the remaining patient was converted 2 years after surgery (BMI 31) to gastric bypass or gastric pouch dilatation. Patient follow-up at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was 48/52 (92.3%), 37/42 (88.1%), 25/33 (75.7%), and 10/10, respectively. At these times, mean BMI was 35.9 +/- 8.4, 37.8 +/- 11.27, 34.9 +/- 12.2, and 29.7 +/- 5.2 Kg/m2. Mean %EWL at the same time was 45.6 +/- 29.6, 39.7 +/- 29.8, 43.7 +/- 38.1, and 55.6 +/- 29.2. Five/25 (20%) patients had < or = 25% EWL at 5 years follow-up, while none of the 10 patients subject to follow-up at 7 years had < or = 25% EWL. CONCLUSIONS: Lap-Band System is an interesting option for teenagers suffering obesity and its related comorbidities, which deserves further investigation.

BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon: The Italian Experience with 2,515 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The temporary use of the BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) in morbidly obesity is increasing worldwide. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the efficacy of this device in a large population, in terms of weight loss and its influence on co-morbidities. METHODS: Data were retrospectively recruited from the data-base of the Italian Collaborative Study Group for Lap-Band and BIB (GILB). After diagnostic endoscopy, the BIB was positioned and was filled with saline (500-700 ml) and methylene blue (10 ml). Patients were discharged with diet counselling ( approximately 1000 Kcal) and medical therapy. The BIB was removed after 6 months. Positioning and removal were performed under conscious or unconscious sedation. Mortality, complications, BMI, %EWL, BMI loss and co-morbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: From May 2000 to September 2004, 2,515 patients underwent BIB (722M/1,793F; mean age 38.9+/-14.7, range 12-71; mean BMI 44.4+/-7.8 kg/m(2) ; range 28.0-79.1; and mean excess weight 59.5+/-29.8 kg, range 16-210). BIB positioning was uncomplicated in all but two cases (0.08%) with acute gastric dilation treated conservatively. Overall complication rate was 70/2,515 (2.8%). Gastric perforation occurred in 5 patients (0.19%), 4 of whom had undergone previous gastric surgery: 2 died and 2 were successfully treated by laparoscopic repair after balloon removal. 19 gastric obstructions (0.76%) presented in the first week after positioning and were successfully treated by balloon removal. Balloon rupture (n=9; 0.36%) was not prevalent within any particular period of BIB treatment, and was also treated by BIB removal. Esophagitis (n=32; 1.27%) and gastric ulcer (n=5; 0.2%) presented in patients without a history of peptic disease and were treated conservatively by drugs. Preoperative co-morbidities were diagnosed in 1,394/2,471 patients (56.4%); these resolved in 617/1,394 (44.3%), improved (less pharmacological dosage or shift to other therapies) in 625/1,394 (44.8%), and were unchanged in 152/1,394 (10.9%). After 6 months, mean BMI was 35.4+/-11.8 kg/m(2) (range 24-73) and %EWL was 33.9+/-18.7 (range 0-87). BMI loss was 4.9+/-12.7 kg/m(2) (range 0-25). CONCLUSIONS: BIB is an effective procedure with satisfactory weight loss and improvement in co-morbidities after 6 months. Previous gastric surgery is a contraindication to BIB placement.

Total intravenous anesthesia with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cistracurium in morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: According to physical impairments of massive obesity, cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal physiology must be considered as much as pharmacokinetic behavior. Anesthetic management of morbidly obese patients has to be carefully planned, in order to minimize the increased risks of aspirative pneumonitis, hemodynamic instability and delay in recovery. The ideal anesthesia should provide a smooth and quick induction, allowing rapid airway control, prominent hemodynamic stability, and rapid emergence from anesthesia. To approach these ideal conditions, a Total Intravenous Anesthesia (TIVA) with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium was designed and analyzed. METHODS: 10 consenting morbidly obese patients scheduled for elective Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding participated in the study. TIVA with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium was used in all cases. Time to loss of consciousness, tracheal intubation, perianesthetic physiological parameters and complications, incidence of awareness with recall, recovery times, postoperative analgesia and costs of drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: The analyzed data showed adequate time and physiological conditions for induction and tracheal intubation, stable maintenance with easy handling of deepness, low incidence of perianesthetic complications, excellent recovery performance and institutional efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: TIVA with midazolam, remifentanil, propofol and cisatracurium was found to be effective, secure, predictable and economic for the anesthetic management of morbidly obese patients.