Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transpl Int ; 28(4): 401-9, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25440520

RESUMO

The OPTN/UNOS Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Pilot Program allocates priority to zero-HLA mismatches. However, in unrelated living donor kidney transplants (LDKT)-the same donor source in KPD-no study has shown whether zero-HLA mismatches provide any advantage over >0 HLA mismatches. We hypothesize that zero-HLA mismatches among unrelated LDKT do not benefit graft survival. This retrospective SRTR database study analyzed LDKT recipients from 1987 to 2012. Among unrelated LDKT, subjects with zero-HLA mismatches were compared to a 1:1-5 matched (by donor age ±1 year and year of transplantation) control cohort with >0 HLA mismatches. The primary endpoint was death-censored graft survival. Among 32,654 unrelated LDKT recipients, 83 had zero-HLA mismatches and were matched to 407 controls with >0 HLA mismatches. Kaplan-Meier analyses for death-censored graft and patient survival showed no difference between study and control cohorts. In multivariate marginal Cox models, zero-HLA mismatches saw no benefit with death-censored graft survival (HR = 1.46, 95% CI 0.78-2.73) or patient survival (HR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.68-3.01). Our data suggest that in unrelated LDKT, zero-HLA mismatches may not offer any survival advantage. Therefore, particular study of zero-HLA mismatching is needed to validate its place in the OPTN/UNOS KPD Pilot Program allocation algorithm.


Assuntos
Antígenos HLA-DR , Antígenos de Histocompatibilidade Classe I , Transplante de Rim , Imunologia de Transplantes , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Doadores Vivos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens ; 20(6): 610-5, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21885969

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The utilization of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in kidney transplantation has dramatically improved short-term outcomes but significant gains in long-term outcomes have proved elusive. Nephrotoxicity is the major problem associated with CNIs and is responsible for the disappointing progress seen in long-term graft survival. In this review, we assess CNI efficacy as well as the latest strategies employed to limit long-term CNI nephrotoxicity. RECENT FINDINGS: Three CNI sparing strategies - CNI withdrawal, CNI avoidance, and CNI minimization - are evaluated with discussion of key studies such as the Efficacy Limiting Toxicity Elimination-Symphony and Spare-the-Nephron studies. Recent breakthroughs in transplant immunosuppression are discussed such as the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies, which have led to the recent US Food and Drug Administratrion approval of belatacept, a novel T-cell costimulation blocker. SUMMARY: For now, CNIs remain the proven standard of care in modern immunosuppression. However, some novel agents may challenge the role CNIs play in kidney transplantation in the very near future.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Calcineurina , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Sirolimo/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...