RESUMO
Classic Impella exchange interrupts flow when the old device is pulled into the aorta before advancing the new device across the aortic valve, threatening circulatory collapse and loss of left ventricular access. In "double barrel," uninterrupted Impella exchange, the new device is placed into the ventricle alongside the old, where flow is first transitioned completely. Of thirty-one consecutive patients undergoing this procedure, none experienced intraoperative cardiac arrest and 96.8% (30/31) had no new aortic insufficiency. One vascular complication ensued following known preoperative iliac injury. One patient suffered nonembolic stroke; another had subarachnoid hemorrhage. Fifty-five percent (17/31) of patients survived, with 22.6% (7/31) recovering, 25.8% (8/31) undergoing transplant, and 6.5% (2/31) transitioning to durable LVAD. Impella-only survival (83.3%, 10/12) was significantly higher than Impella-ECMO survival (36.8%, 7/19) (OR 14.46, 95% CI 1.74-119.93, p=0.01). We conclude "double barrel" technique is reliable in device-dependent cardiogenic shock patients, offering significant advantage and minimal risk.
RESUMO
We have described a patient with a history of type A-11 dissection repair, who subsequently underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with distal bare metal dissection stents (provisional extension to induce complete attachment) and renal artery stenting for malperfusion. During the next 3 years, the thoracoabdominal aorta had continued to enlarge to 6.9 cm, despite false lumen embolization and thoracic endovascular aortic repair extension. Given the continued aortic enlargement, physician-modified fenestrated endovascular aortic repair was performed within the prior aortic and renal stents with successful aneurysm sealing. The results from the present case have illustrated that continued aneurysmal degeneration can occur after provisional extension to induce complete attachment and that subsequent physician-modified fenestrated endovascular aortic repair is feasible.
