Provocative discography in low back pain patients with or without somatization disorder: a randomized prospective evaluation.

Recent reports of provocative discography not only instill confusion, but also create numerous questions about its value in evaluating low back pain. It was reported that provocative discography produced pain in patients who were not suffering with low back pain but suffering with somatization disorder and depression. This study was designed to evaluate 50 randomly assigned patients, with 25 patients in Group I without somatization disorder and 25 patients in Group II with diagnosis of somatization disorder. In addition, depression, generalized anxiety disorder and combinations thereof were also evaluated. All patients underwent discography, investigating two to three discs in each patient. All studies included a control level with a disc that did not produce the patient's pain upon injection of contrast medium. Provocation with exact pain reproduction concordant with the symptom complex upon injection of contrast into the disc was considered positive. Any other response, with or without pain, was considered negative. Results showed positive provocative discography in 46% of the patients in the somatization group compared to 54% in the non-somatization group; in 46% of patients with depression compared to 54% of patients without depression; in 15 of 30 patients with generalized anxiety disorder; in 11 of 20 patients without generalized anxiety disorder; and in 42% of patients with combined somatization and depression, with negative discography in 58% of the patients. It is concluded that provocative discography provides similar results in patients with or without somatization, with or without depression, with somatization but with or without depression or with other combinations of the psychological triad of somatization disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder.

Evaluation of the relative contributions of various structures in chronic low back pain.

An attempt was made to determine the relative contribution of various structures to chronic low back pain, including facet joint(s), disc(s), and sacroiliac joint(s) in a prospective evaluation. Precision diagnostic blocks, including disc injections, facet joint blocks, and sacroiliac joint injections, are frequently used. In contrast, selective nerve root blocks or transforaminal epidural injections are used occasionally to evaluate persistent or recurrent low back pain in patients without appropriate radiologic or neurophysiologic diagnosis. One hundred and twenty patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were evaluated with precision diagnostic injections, which included medial branch blocks, provocative discography and sacroiliac joint injections. In 40% (95% CL, 31%, 49%), of the patients, facet joint pain was diagnosed; and in 26% (95% CL, 18%, 34%) of the patients discogenic pain was diagnosed; and 2% of the patients were diagnosed with sacroiliac joint pain.

Influence of psychological factors on the ability to diagnose chronic low back pain of facet joint origin.

This study was designed to determine the prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in patients suffering with or without somatization disorder. The study was performed using comparative local anesthetic blocks. One hundred consecutive patients with chronic low back pain, with or without somatization, were evaluated. The results showed that, among patients suffering with chronic low back pain, 44% of the patients without somatization and 38% of the patients with somatization were positive for facet joint pain. The diagnosis of facet joint pain was not influenced by the presence or absence of somatization disorder. The evaluation also was extended to depression, generalized anxiety disorder and combinations with or without somatization thereof which showed no significant differences in the prevalence of facet joint pain. The results of this study demonstrated that the facet joint was a source of pain in chronic low back pain patients in 44% of the patients without somatization and 38% of the patients with somatization. This study also showed that there was no correlation between the presence or absence of facet joint pain and the presence or absence of somatization disorder or any other psychological condition or combination thereof.

Effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis in refractory spinal stenosis.

The increasing proportion of elderly patients, coupled with increasing longevity, causes the problem of lumbosacral pain secondary to spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine to be an important issue. Symptoms of spinal stenosis are caused by entrapment and compression of intraspinal vascular and nervous structures; which may lead to inactivity, loss of productivity, and potential loss of independence, particularly in the elderly. Surgical decompression is considered as the natural treatment. However, the results of surgical treatments have been mixed. Results of conservative treatment are also not encouraging. While the effectiveness of caudal epidural blocks for lumbar canal stenosis was positive, the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections showed no beneficial effects on symptomatology of spinal stenosis. Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis has been studied in patients with refractory low back pain secondary to post lumbar laminectomy syndrome, as well as spinal stenosis. The specific role of adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis in the management of refractory low back and lower extremity pain secondary to spinal stenosis has not been studied. This retrospective evaluation included 18 patients derived from a total sample of 239 patients undergoing adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis over a period of 3 years. The results showed significant improvement with reduction of pain; with improvement of physical health, mental health, and functional status. Improvement in psychological status was also noted, with decrease in narcotic intake. Epidural adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis is a safe and probably effective modality of treatment in managing symptomatic moderate to severe lumbar spinal canal stenosis.