RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: to map the clinical parameters used in the speech-language pathology assessment of the chronic cough. METHODS: a scoping review was performed to answer the clinical question: "What are the clinical parameters included in the speech-language pathology assessment of patients with chronic cough?" Evidence was searched by electronic and manual search. The electronic search included: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and LILACS. Each database had a specific search strategy. The manual search included Journal of Voice, Chest, and Thorax, Brazilian Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Grey, and Clinical Trials, in addition to scanning the references of the included studies. The extracted data considered information regarding the publication, sample, assessment, and measures used when assessing chronic cough. RESULTS: the electronic search found 289 studies; the manual search found 1036 studies; 12 were selected for the present study. The most used assessments were: self-assessment (75%), aerodynamic analysis (66.67%), the perceptual auditory judgment of the voice quality (58.33%), acoustic analysis of the voice (41.67%), cough frequency, and cough threshold (41.67%) and electroglottography (25%). CONCLUSIONS: the subjective instruments were used more frequently, while specific objective instruments, which are recent, were used less frequently. Complementary assessments such as vocal assessment, have been frequently used, also, with no other parameter. A lack of homogeneity was identified in the speech-language pathology assessment and measures of patients with chronic cough, thus, the comparison among studies and clinical analysis is difficult.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the efficacy of speech-language pathology therapy in the self-assessment, in the cough frequency, and the vocal quality of adults with chronic cough. METHODS: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis that answered the clinical question: "In adults with chronic cough, what is the effect of the speech-language pathology therapy in the self-assessment, in the cough frequency, and the vocal quality, compared to another intervention?" (PROSPERO 2021/CRD42021226729). An electronic search (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs), and a manual search (Journal of Voice, Brazilian Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Grey and Clinical Trials) with specific search strategies was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis (standardized difference of means, Inverse Variance, and random effects model) and heterogeneity analysis (Chi², Tau², and I²) were performed. RESULTS: We found 610 studies and selected three. There was an uncertain risk of detection bias. The data were heterogeneous, and there was no difference between interventions in self-perception of cough severity (z = 0.09, P = 0.930; tau² = 0.65, I² = 90%) and in the self-perception of the effects of chronic cough on health status (z = 0.30, P = 0.77; tau² = 0.99, I² = 97%). The estimated mean difference was 0.97 to cough frequency, and it was differ significantly from zero (z = 4.47, P < 0.001) but the results are heterogeneous (Chi² (1) = 22.22, P < 0.001, I² = 95%). CONCLUSION: The speech-language pathology therapy had a greater effect size than the control interventions on cough frequency. However, in the subjects' perception, there were no differences between the interventions.
