In vivo assessment of coronary stents with 64-row multidetector computed tomography: analysis of metal artifacts.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate stent-induced artifacts by 64-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: We studied 26 stented patients with MDCT before conventional coronary angiography (CCA). The CT values were measured. Stents were classified as occluded, with significant stenosis, with nonsignificant stenosis, or patent. For the patent stents, mean in-stent and out-stent CT values were compared; stents 3 mm or smaller were compared with stents larger than 3 mm. Multidetector CT was compared with CCA. RESULTS: We analyzed 42 stents. At CCA, 34 stents were patent, 5 were nonsignificantly stenosed, 1 was significantly stenosed, and 2 were occluded. At MDCT, 33 of 34 patent stents, 2 occluded stents, and 1 stent with significant stenosis were correctly diagnosed; nonsignificant stenoses were undetected, 1 patent stent was misdiagnosed as occluded (κ = 0.727). The out-stent CT value was lower than in-stent CT value both in stents 3 mm or smaller (P = 0.001) and stents larger than 3 mm (P < 0.001). The in-stent CT value of stents 3 mm or smaller was higher (P = 0.011) than that of stents larger than 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Metal artifacts cause overlooking of nonsignificant stenosis.

A new device to seal large coronary aneurysms: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery aneurysm is an uncommon disease. It is defined as a coronary artery dilatation, exceeding the diameter of the normal adjacent segment or the diameter of the patient's largest coronary vessel by 1.5 to 2 times. Coronary artery aneurysms are typically diagnosed by coronary angiography. The prognosis of coronary artery aneurysm is not well known and the management is challenging. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old Italian-Caucasian man presented to our hospital with angina. Coronary angiography revealed a large coronary aneurysm of the right coronary artery, which was successfully treated by the percutaneous implantation of an MGuardTM stent. CONCLUSION: This case report provides evidence that coronary artery aneurysms, even if very large, can be safely treated by MGuardTM stent implantation. We strongly emphasize the high flexibility and good deliverability of this device, which leads to the complete exclusion of the aneurysm mediated by the process of endothelization of its thin mesh sleeves.

Diagnostic work up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Consensus statement.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) has become a widespread diagnostic tool. Since its introduction CMR has been used to image patients with known or suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Several abnormalities have been found and described by CMR and at present this diagnostic tool is considered very important for the diagnosis. However, the diagnosis of ARVC relies upon the fulfillment of both clinical and functional criteria and CMR can provide several but not all the information useful for the diagnosis. Furthermore, some findings such as evidence of right ventricular epicardial fat once considered a peculiar marker of ARVC, have been shown to possess a low specificity. This document was prepared by representatives of the three Italian official Organizations involved in CMR. Its main scope is to highlight the problems encountered when studying patients with suspected ARVC by CMR, to indicate the basic technical equipment needed, to recommend a proper imaging protocol and to offer a consensus on the main diagnostic features relevant for the diagnosis.

Diagnostic work-up of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become a widespread diagnostic tool. Since its introduction, CMR has been used to image patients with a known or suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Several abnormalities have been found and described by CMR and at present this diagnostic tool is considered very important for the diagnosis. However, the diagnosis of ARVC relies upon the fulfillment of both clinical and functional criteria and CMR can provide several but not all the information useful for the diagnosis. Furthermore, some findings such as evidence of right ventricular epicardial fat, once considered a peculiar marker of ARVC, have been shown to possess a low specificity. This document was prepared by representatives of the three Italian official Organizations involved in CMR. Its main scope is to highlight the problems encountered when studying patients with suspected ARVC at CMR, to indicate the basic technical equipment needed, to recommend a proper imaging protocol and to offer a consensus on the main features relevant for the diagnosis.

Acute spontaneous aortic pathologies associated with intramural hematoma: can a differential diagnosis be made by imaging techniques?

Acute intramural aortic hematoma may result from ruptured vasa vasorum without intimal disruption (IMH hereafter) but can also be found in association with processes in which an intimal lesion is present, such as aortic dissections (AD), where the hematoma represents the acute thrombosis of the false lumen, or in penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU), where blood collects beyond the disrupted internal elastic lamina. As the clinical presentation of these conditions is very similar, imaging techniques should aim both to diagnose the hematoma and to characterize the underlying pathology. This review critically analyzes the diagnostic potential of several imaging methods based on personal experience and literature reports. Although intramural hematoma can be easily diagnosed unrespective of the tomographic imaging modality, it is usually difficult to distinguish between IMH and hematomas associated either to AD or to PAU. Indeed, only PAU related hematomas can be consistently diagnosed due to the high probability of unveiling the causative wall ulceration; conversely, the differential diagnosis between IMH and AD - associated hematomas is still matter of controversy. According to the literature, the two conditions cannot be differentiated by transesophageal echocardiography, though some reports state that a distinction might be made by MR imaging. As regards CT, only a small percentage of AD - associated hematomas exhibit clear evidence of a typical intimal flap, allowing for a safe diagnosis to be made: often, unfortunately, the intimal lesion subsequently found at surgery cannot be detected, yielding a picture of IMH. Therefore, the radiological report should give the same diagnostic probability to both conditions.