Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 30(10): 687-693, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251974

RESUMO

Few reports assessed endothelial activation biomarkers in kidney allograft biopsies using immunohistochemistry. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between posttransplant outcomes and the immunohistochemistry expression of Caveolin-1, Von Willebrand Factor (Vwf), and T-Cadherin in for-cause biopsies diagnosed as interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy of unknown etiology. Samples with antibody-mediated changes were excluded. The patients were followed for 3 years after the biopsy or until graft loss/death. Seventy-one (71) samples from 66 patients were included. Eighteen (25.4%) patients lost their grafts, mainly due to chronic rejection (33.3%). Caveolin-1 and T-Cadherin were not associated with graft loss. Vwf had good accuracy in predicting graft failure (AUC 0.637, 95% CI 0.486 to 0.788 P =0.101). The presence of more than 10% of Vwf positivity in the microvasculature (Vwf >10%) was associated with reduced death-censored graft survival (58.2% vs. 85.4% P =0.006), and this result was also observed in the subgroup presenting mild interstitial fibrosis (ci=1) (65.7% vs. 88.6% P =0.033). The multivariate analysis showed that Vwf >10% was an independent risk factor for graft loss (HR=2.88, 95% CI 1.03 to 8.02 P =0.043). In conclusion, Vwf might be an additional tool to predict allograft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy of unknown etiology, probably reflecting immune endothelial activation.


Assuntos
Nefropatias , Transplante de Rim , Humanos , Aloenxertos/patologia , Atrofia/patologia , Biópsia , Caveolina 1 , Fibrose , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Rim/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fator de von Willebrand , Imuno-Histoquímica
2.
Ophthalmic Res ; 64(1): 1-9, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32163944

RESUMO

Scleral and iris fixation of intraocular lenses (IOL) are useful in the treatment of surgical or traumatic aphakia, luxation, and subluxation of IOL if the patient does not present appropriate capsular support. However, there is no consensus in the literature about which of these 2 methods is safer and better. The authors performed a literature review searching the main postoperative outcomes obtained with the use of each surgical method. Scleral and iris fixation of IOL are efficient in correction of the patients' visual acuity, even though each technique presents distinct complications which depend especially on the experience of the surgeon with the performed surgical method. It is important to understand that individuals submitted to scleral or iris fixation present previous preoperative complications in their eyes. Besides, both procedures are very complex, involving intense manipulation of the eye globe. The success rate of these surgical techniques is highly variable and has a close relation to the preoperative conditions of the patient's eye and the improvement of the surgeon's learning curve.


Assuntos
Iris/cirurgia , Doenças do Cristalino/cirurgia , Implante de Lente Intraocular/métodos , Lentes Intraoculares , Esclera/cirurgia , Técnicas de Sutura , Acuidade Visual , Humanos , Doenças do Cristalino/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...