A new risk score to assess atrial fibrillation risk in hypertensive patients (ESCARVAL-RISK Project.

This study aimed to assess atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence and predictive factors in hypertensive patients and to formulate an AF risk assessment score that can be used to identify the patients most likely to develop AF. This was a cohort study of patients recruited in primary healthcare centers. Patients aged 40 years or older with hypertension, free of AF and with no previous cardiovascular events were included. Patients attended annual visits according to clinical practice until the end of study or onset of AF. The association between AF incidence and explanatory variables (age, sex, body mass index, medical history and other) was analyzed. Finally, 12,206 patients were included (52.6% men, and mean age was 64.9 years); the mean follow-up was 36.7 months, and 394 (3.2%) patients were diagnosed with AF. The incidence of AF was 10.5/1000 person-years. Age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.08), male sex (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.53-2.31), obesity (HR 2.57; 95% CI 1.70-3.90), and heart failure (HR 2.44; 95% CI 1.45-4.11) were independent predictors (p < 0.001). We propose a risk score based on significant predictors, which enables the identification of people with hypertension who are at the greatest risk of AF.

Influence of renal function on anticoagulation control in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation taking vitamin K antagonists.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been related to poor anticoagulation control and an increased risk of bleeding. This study aims to evaluate the association between impaired renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and anticoagulation control in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) therapy. We also assessed whether the predictive value of the SAMe-TT2 R2 score prevailed for subgroups both with and without CKD. METHODS: This is an ancillary analysis of 1381 patients from the PAULA study, which was a cross-sectional, retrospective and nationwide multicenter study. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Anticoagulation control levels progressively worsened across each stage of CKD. Multiple linear regression analysis showed CKD as an independent predictor of time in therapeutic range (TTR). In the subgroup of patients with preserved renal function, female sex, diet affecting INR, polypharmacy and amiodarone were associated with poorer TTR. The SAMe-TT2 R2 score had a significant but modest predictive value for TTR<65% (AUC, area under the curve 0.558, P = .002). In the subgroup of patients with CKD, the SAMe-TT2 R2 (>2 points) showed no significant predictive capacity for TTR (AUC 0.528, P = .354). The average TTR was similar for both sexes (P = .255), but with a higher percentage of males subjects with TTR ≥65% (P = .013). CONCLUSION: Chronic kidney disease is associated with poor anticoagulation control in patients with non-valvular AF taking VKA. The SAMe-TT2 R2 score was not predictive of poor TTR in the subgroup with CKD, although a modest predictive value for poor TTR was found in those without CKD.

Guía de práctica clínica sobre tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca crónica / Clinical practice guide on chronic heart failure treatment

El objetivo general de la Guía de Práctica Clínica es proporcionar a los agentes encargados de la asistencia y cuidados de este tipo de pacientes, una herramienta que les permita tomar las mejores decisiones sobre algunos de los problemas que ocasionan su atención y que no han sido resueltos. Esta Guía ha sido desarrollada para generar recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca crónica (ICC). Abarca los siguientes aspectos: TRATAMIENTO FARMACOLÓGICO: - Inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina ( o antagonistas de los receptores de la angiotensina), Betabloqueantes y antagonistas de la aldosterona en pacientes mayores de 65 años con disfunción sistólica. En pacientes con con fracción de eyección preservada o ligeramente deprimida. - Efectividad de la eplerona frente a espironolactona. - Eficacia del sacubitrilo/valsartán sustituyendo a un inhibidor de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina (o a un antagonista del receptor de la angiotensina II), junto a betabloqueante y antagonistas de la aldosterona. TRATAMIENTO NO FARMACOLÓGICO: -Control temprano tras el alta hospitalaria. -Eficacia de las medidas higiénico-dietéticas. -Monitorización mediante péptidos natriuréticos para control del tratamiento farmacológico. -Eficacia de los programas de telemedicina. -Eficacia de las rehabilitación cardiaca basada en el ejercicio. -Eficacia de los desfibriladores automáticos implantables en mayores de 65 años.

Respuesta de los autores: Fibrilación auricular en la práctica clínica: todavía faltan respuestas, pero ¿interpretamos bien las que tenemos? / Reply: Atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: More answers are required, but do we interpret properly the current evidence?

No disponible

Validez y utilidad del péptido ventricular natriurético tipo B (BNP) en la detección de disfunción ventricular izquierda en pacientes de alto riesgo en atención primaria / Validity and usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for early detection of left ventricular dysfunction in high-risk patients in Primary Care

Objetivo: Determinar la validez y utilidad del BNP en atención primaria para detectar la disfunción ventricular en pacientes asintomáticos con alto riesgo de insuficiencia cardiaca (IC). Diseño: Estudio descriptivo prospectivo y multicéntrico de validación de prueba diagnóstica. Emplazamiento: Consultas de atención primaria de 7 centros de salud de la comunidad de Madrid. Participantes: Muestra consecutiva de 204 pacientes asintomáticos con riesgo elevado de presentar IC (estadios A y B de la American Heart Association). Mediciones principales: Se recogieron datos de la anamnesis, exploración física, electrocardiograma, factores de riesgo de IC y tratamiento actual. Se determinó el BNP en sangre venosa en la propia consulta mediante Triage BNP Test® (Biosite®) realizándose en las siguientes 72h un ecocardiograma (prueba de referencia). Comparamos los niveles de BNP según presencia o ausencia de disfunción ventricular, tipo (sistólica/diastólica) y grado. Se calcularon la sensibilidad, especificidad y los valores predictivos para el mejor punto de corte en la curva ROC. Resultados: Los valores de BNP fueron más altos (p<0,001) en pacientes con disfunción sistólica ventricular izquierda (DSVI). No se hallaron diferencias significativas para la disfunción diastólica. El mejor punto de corte para la detección de DSVI fue 71,00 pg/ml, siendo el área bajo la curva de 0,757 (IC 95%: 0,64-0,87). La sensibilidad fue del 75% (IC 95%: 50,66-99,34), especificidad 70,19% (62,81-77,57), valor predictivo positivo 20% (IC 95%: 9,05-30,95) y valor predictivo negativo 96,58% (IC 95%: 92,86-100), siendo la prevalencia de DSVI en esta población del 9,04%. Conclusiones: El BNP puede tener utilidad en el diagnóstico precoz de DSVI en pacientes de alto riesgo de IC en consultas de atención primaria debido a su alto VPN (> 96%)(AU)

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of BNP test for early diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction in patients at high-risk for heart failure. Design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: 7 Primary Care Centres in Madrid (Spain). Participants: A consecutive sample of 204 consecutive asymptomatic patients with high risk for heart failure (Stages A-B, AHA/ACC Classification). Main measurements: BNP plasma levels were measured in the clinical setting using Triage BNP Test® (Biosite®) and an echocardiography was performed in the following 3 days in a single hospital unit as a reference standard. Plasma BNP levels were compared depending on the presence/absence of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), type and severity degree. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Área under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for BNP assay were calculated. Results: BNP values were significantly higher (P<.001) in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). No significant differences were found for diastolic dysfunction. The best cut-off value to discriminate the patients with LVSD was 71.00 pg/ml, with an Área under the ROC curve of 0.757 (95% CI 0.64-0.87). Sensitivity for LVD diagnosis was 75% (95% CI 50.66-99.34), specificity 70.19% (95% CI 62.81-77.57), positive predictive value (PPV) 20% (95% CI 9.05-30.95), and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.58% (95% CI 92.86-100), with LVSD prevalence of 9.04% in this population. Conclusions: BNP determinations are of value in diagnosing LVSD in a primary care setting, with similar sensitivities and specificities. Due to the high NPV is useful to rule-out patients for echocardiography(AU)

[Validity and usefulness of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for early detection of left ventricular dysfunction in high-risk patients in primary care]. / Validez y utilidad del péptido ventricular natriurético tipo B (BNP) en la detección de disfunción ventricular izquierda en pacientes de alto riesgo en atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of BNP test for early diagnosis of left ventricular dysfunction in patients at high-risk for heart failure. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: 7 Primary Care Centres in Madrid (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 204 consecutive asymptomatic patients with high risk for heart failure (Stages A-B, AHA/ACC Classification). MAIN MEASUREMENTS: BNP plasma levels were measured in the clinical setting using Triage BNP Test(®) (Biosite(®)) and an echocardiography was performed in the following 3 days in a single hospital unit as a reference standard. Plasma BNP levels were compared depending on the presence/absence of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), type and severity degree. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and Área under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for BNP assay were calculated. RESULTS: BNP values were significantly higher (P<.001) in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). No significant differences were found for diastolic dysfunction. The best cut-off value to discriminate the patients with LVSD was 71.00 pg/ml, with an Área under the ROC curve of 0.757 (95% CI 0.64-0.87). Sensitivity for LVD diagnosis was 75% (95% CI 50.66-99.34), specificity 70.19% (95% CI 62.81-77.57), positive predictive value (PPV) 20% (95% CI 9.05-30.95), and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.58% (95% CI 92.86-100), with LVSD prevalence of 9.04% in this population. CONCLUSIONS: BNP determinations are of value in diagnosing LVSD in a primary care setting, with similar sensitivities and specificities. Due to the high NPV is useful to rule-out patients for echocardiography.