The platelet function dose-response to abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization is variable.

The platelet function dose-response to incremental abciximab (Reopro, Eli Lilly/Centocor, Indianapolis, IN) bolus dosing during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated in 85 patients using a point-of-service platelet function assay. Patients received incremental bolus doses of abciximab at 10- to 20-min intervals; platelet function was measured at 10-min intervals during dosing. The percentage of patients achieving > or = 80% inhibition of platelet function after 50%, 75%, and 100% of a standard abciximab bolus was 40%, 87%, and 95%, respectively. There were no significant associations between the platelet function dose-response to abciximab and age, weight, platelet count, hematocrit, heparin dose, peak activated clotting time, thienopyridine use prior to PCI, gender, cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, or clinical syndrome. This study demonstrated significant interpatient variability in platelet function dose-response to abciximab with a substantial proportion (87%) of patients achieving high-level platelet function inhibition with less than the standard abciximab bolus dose.

Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal level of platelet inhibition with a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist necessary to minimize thrombotic complications in patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred patients undergoing a PCI with the planned use of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor had platelet inhibition measured at 10 minutes, 1 hour, 8 hours, and 24 hours after the initiation of therapy with the Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay (Accumetrics). Major adverse cardiac events (MACES: composite of death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization) were prospectively monitored, and the incidence correlated with the measured level of platelet function inhibition at all time points. One quarter of all patients did not achieve >/=95% inhibition 10 minutes after the bolus and experienced a significantly higher incidence of MACEs (14.4% versus 6.4%, P=0.006). Patients whose platelet function was <70% inhibited at 8 hours after the start of therapy had a MACE rate of 25% versus 8.1% for those >/=70% inhibited (P=0.009). By multivariate analysis, platelet function inhibition >/=95% at 10 minutes after the start of therapy was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of a MACE (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variability in the level of platelet function inhibition is achieved with GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy among patients undergoing PCI. The level of platelet function inhibition as measured by a point-of-care assay is an independent predictor for the risk of MACEs after PCI.

Prevention of coronary restenosis.

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) was introduced 22 years ago as a nonsurgical catheter-based treatment for obstructive coronary artery disease. Over the following 2 decades, major advances in equipment and techniques led to tremendous growth in the use of PTCA to treat coronary artery disease and angina. Restenosis persists as the limiting factor in the maintenance of vessel patency after PTCA, occurring in 30% to 50% of patients and accounting for significant morbidity and health care expenditures. Plaque persistence and vessel recoil, thrombus formation, constrictive remodeling, and neointimal proliferation are the primary contributors to the development of restenosis after PTCA. Early clinical trials in restenosis prevention using various revascularization devices, antiplatelet drugs, antithrombotic drugs, and antiinflammatory drugs were uniformly negative. Coronary stents are the only devices that have shown a reduction in the incidence of restenosis. Recently, novel therapies, such as intracoronary radiation, antioxidant drugs, and platelet-derived growth factor antagonists, have shown reductions in the incidence of restenosis in small randomized trials. This review focuses on the etiology and pathophysiology of restenosis and discusses current and future therapies that may reduce the incidence of restenosis.