RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of patient education on videotaped topical instillation of artificial tear drops on subsequent topical instillation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients, who had been using glaucoma drops for at least 6 months and with a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/100 or better, were studied. The patients were asked to instill an artificial tear drop using their accustomed technique while being video recorded. The patients viewed the recordings, and the errors in their drop instillation method were pointed out. This was followed by an educational session on proper drop instillation technique. After 30 minutes, patients were videotaped instilling drops to ascertain the effect of the educational session. The variables compared were: number of drops instilled, number of drops reaching the ocular surface, and the number of times the tip of the medication bottle touched the eye or ocular adnexa. RESULTS: Before the instruction session, patients squeezed an average of 1.5 ± 0.9 drops from the bottle, and the average number of drops reaching the conjunctival fornix was 0.9 ± 0.7. The tip of the bottle touched the ocular adnexa in 29/45 (64.4%) patients. After the education session, the patients squeezed an average of 1.2 ± 0.5 drops and an average of 1.2 ± 0.4 drops reached the conjunctival fornix. The tip of the bottle touched the ocular adnexa in 13/45 (28.9%) patients. With proper instructions, the percentage of patients that instilled just one drop on the eye increased from 66 to 82%. CONCLUSION: A single educational session on the proper use of topical drops improves the successful instillation of eye drops. However, it was not determined whether the patients will retain the improved instillation technique for long-term or if the intervention results in only a short-term improvement. How to cite this article: Lazcano-Gomez G, Castillejos A, Kahook M, Jimenez-Roman J, Gonzalez-Salinas R. Video-graphic Assessment of Glaucoma Drop Instillation. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2015;9(2):47-50.
RESUMO
UNLABELLED: Objective. To present a 4-year experience of surveillance and management of surgical wound complications in a cohort of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at a cancer hospital. METHODS: A descriptive follow-up study was undertaken at a teaching, referral cancer hospital in Mexico City (National Cancer Institute). Patients (n = 1774) underwent 1888 breast cancer surgeries. The main outcome measures were wound complications (surgical site infections [SSI], flap necrosis, and dehiscence). RESULTS: There were 873 (46.2%) wound complications recorded. The most frequent complications were SSI (n = 387, 20.5%), flap necrosis (n = 274, 14.5%), and dehiscence (n = 212, 11.2%). Most patients with infections were treated with oral antibiotics and local wound management (n = 353, 91.9%) with positive results. Flap necrosis and dehiscence were treated under the wound bed preparation model with debridement plus combined (concomitant or sequential) dressings and ointments that favored wound healing, achieving closure at the last appointment in 189 (48.4%) patients. Average time to closure for necrotized and dehisced wounds was 52.4 ± 45.7 and 45.2 ± 36.1 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: An average delay of 10 days on the initiation of adjuvant treatment was observed in patients with a wound complication (SSI, flap necrosis, or dehiscence) compared to patients without wound complications (P = 0.002). The frequency of wound complications was high. Active surveillance allowed the authors to diagnose wound complications early in their development. Local wound management under the wound preparation model and use of antibiotics when an infection is suspected were successful therapies in most patients.