Results from the long-term extension of PRIME: A randomized Phase 1b trial of aducanumab.

INTRODUCTION: Aducanumab selectively targets aggregated forms of amyloid beta (Aß), a neuropathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: PRIME was a Phase 1b, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of aducanumab. During the 12-month placebo-controlled period, participants with prodromal AD or mild AD dementia were randomized to receive aducanumab or placebo. At week 56, participants could enroll in a long-term extension (LTE), in which all participants received aducanumab. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) were the most common adverse event. Dose titration was associated with a decrease in the incidence of ARIA-E. Over 48 months, aducanumab decreased brain amyloid levels in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Exploratory endpoints suggested a continued benefit in the reduction of clinical decline over 48 months. DISCUSSION: The safety profile of aducanumab remained unchanged in the LTE of PRIME. Amyloid plaque levels continued to decrease in participants treated with aducanumab. HIGHLIGHTS: PRIME was a Phase 1b, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of aducanumab. We report cumulative safety and 48-month efficacy results from PRIME. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema (ARIA-E) were the most common adverse event (AE); 61% of participants with ARIA-E were asymptomatic. Dose titration was associated with a decrease in the incidence of ARIA-E. Aducanumab decreased levels of amyloid beta (Aß) in a dose- and time-dependent manner.

Genome-Wide Association Studies of ARIA From the Aducanumab Phase 3 ENGAGE and EMERGE Studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were the most common adverse events reported in the phase 3 ENGAGE and EMERGE trials of aducanumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody. APOE ε4 carrier status has been shown to increase risk of ARIA in prior trials of aducanumab and other anti-amyloid therapies; however, the remainder of the human genome has not been evaluated for ARIA risk factors. Therefore, we sought to determine in a hypothesis-free manner whether genetic variants beyond APOE influence risk of ARIA in aducanumab-treated patients. METHODS: We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of ARIA in participants in the ENGAGE and EMERGE trials. Participants had mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease or mild Alzheimer disease dementia and were amyloid-positive on PET scans. All participants underwent regular MRI monitoring to detect and diagnose ARIA. RESULTS: Of the 3,285 participants in the intent-to-treat population, this analysis included 1,691 with genotyping array data who received at least one dose of aducanumab with at least one post-baseline MRI. All participants in the study cohort were of European ancestry; 51% were female. The mean age was 70.3 years. 31% had ARIA-E, 19% had ARIA-H microhemorrhage, and 14% had ARIA-H superficial siderosis. We identified one genome-wide significant (p < 5.0 × 10-8) association at the chromosome 19 locus encompassing APOE. The APOE association with ARIA was stronger in ε4/ε4 homozygotes (OR = 4.28, 4.58, 7.84; p < 2.9 × 10-14 for ARIA-E, ARIA-H microhemorrhage, and ARIA-H superficial siderosis, respectively) than in ε3/ε4 heterozygotes (OR = 1.74, 1.46, 3.14; p ≤ 0.03). We found greater odds of radiographically severe ARIA (OR = 7.04-24.64, p ≤ 2.72 × 10-5) than radiographically mild ARIA (OR = 3.19-5.00, p ≤ 1.37 × 10-5) among ε4/ε4 homozygotes. APOE ε4 was also significantly associated with both symptomatic (ε4/ε4 OR = 3.64-9.52; p < 0.004) and asymptomatic (ε4/ε4 OR = 4.20-7.94, p < 1.7 × 10-11) cases, although among ARIA cases, APOE did not appear to modulate symptomatic status. No other genome-wide significant associations were found. DISCUSSION: We identified a strong, genome-wide significant association between APOE and risk of ARIA. Future, larger studies may be better powered to detect associations beyond APOE. These findings indicate that APOE is the strongest genetic risk factor of ARIA incidence, with implications for patient management and risk-benefit treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Both trials (ENGAGE [221AD301]: NCT02477800 and EMERGE [221AD302]: NCT02484547) were registered in June 2015 at clinicaltrials.gov and enrolled patients from August 2015 to July 2018.

Alzheimer disease neuropathology in a patient previously treated with aducanumab.

Amyloid beta (Aß) plaque is a defining pathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Aducanumab, a monoclonal IgG1 that selectively binds aggregated species of Aß, has been shown by amyloid positron emission tomography (Amyloid PET) to reduce Aß plaques in patients with prodromal and mild AD. This is the first autopsy report of the AD neuropathology in a patient previously treated with aducanumab. The patient was an 84-year-old woman who was randomized to the placebo arm of the PRIME Phase 1b study (221AD103). The patient progressed to moderate dementia (MMSE = 14/30), beyond the targeted early AD treatment stage, before receiving aducanumab in the long-term extension (LTE). The patient then received 32 monthly doses of aducanumab, titrated up to 6 mg/kg, for a cumulative dose of 186 mg/kg. In the LTE, Amyloid PET scans demonstrated robust Aß plaque reduction, from a composite standard uptake value ratio (SUVR) of 1.5 at screening to < 1.1 at 56 weeks post-aducanumab dosing. MRI examinations were negative for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). She passed away in hospice care 4 months after her last dose of aducanumab. The postmortem neuropathologic examination confirmed AD neuropathologic changes. Aß and IBA1 immunohistochemistry assays demonstrated sparse residual Aß plaque engaged by amoeboid reactive microglia. Phospho-Tau (pTau) immunohistochemistry demonstrated neocortical neurofibrillary degeneration (Braak stage V, NIA/AA Stage B3). However, the density of pTau neuropathology, including neuritic plaque pTau (NP-Tau), appeared lower in the PRIME LTE Patient compared to a reference cohort of untreated Braak stage V-VI, NIA/AA Stage B3 AD cases. Taken together, this case report is the first to provide Amyloid PET and neuropathologic evidence substantiating the impact of aducanumab to reduce Aß plaque neuropathology in a patient with AD. Furthermore, this report underscores the critical importance of autopsy neuropathology studies to augment our understanding of aducanumab's mechanism of action and impact on AD biomarkers.

Development of a cognitive composite for measuring change in progressive supranuclear palsy.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) experience cognitive changes that are challenging to follow without a validated neuropsychological test battery to measure progression. This study describes a composite measure to evaluate cognition in individuals with PSP. METHODS: Baseline cognitive test data from 486 participants with PSP in the PASSPORT (NCT03068468) study included the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Color Trails Test (CTT) parts 1 and 2, letter-number sequencing, and letter fluency. Data were analyzed using summary statistics and a matrix of Pearson correlations. A hypothetical factor structure was constructed and validated. RESULTS: Observed correlations were highest for scores between story memory and story recall (correlation coefficient = 0.78) and lowest for scores between letter fluency and picture naming (correlation coefficient = 0.11), and picture naming and figure copy (correlation coefficient = 0.12). After excluding picture naming and Color Trails Test (CTT) parts 1 and 2, a 3-factor structure was hypothesized for the remaining 13 tests. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated goodness of fit within acceptable limits (comparative fit index and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.98, standardized root-mean-square residual and root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05-0.06). Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of change from baseline to week 52 in RBANS and PSP cognitive composite score produced mean-to-standard-deviation ratios of 0.418 and 0.780, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This novel composite endpoint, based on RBANS and designed to account for motor impairments in PSP, improves on current cognitive assessments PSP.

Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate.

BACKGROUND: Peginterferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate (GA) are approved first-line therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their therapeutic efficacy has not been compared directly. METHODS: Clinical outcomes at 2 years, including no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or GA 20 mg/ml once daily (QD) were compared by propensity score matching analysis using individual patient data from ADVANCE and CONFIRM phase III clinical trials. In addition, clinical outcomes at 1-3 years for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a Q2W or GA 40 mg/ml three times a week (TIW) were evaluated using a matching-adjusted comparison analysis of individual patient data from ADVANCE and the ADVANCE extension study, ATTAIN, and aggregate patient data from the phase III GALA and the GALA extension studies. RESULTS: Propensity-score-matched peginterferon beta-1a patients (n = 336) had a significantly lower annualized relapse rate [ARR (0.204 versus 0.282); rate ratio = 0.724; p = 0.045], a significantly lower probability of 12-week confirmed disability worsening (10.0% versus 14.6%; hazard ratio = 0.625; p = 0.048), and a significantly higher rate of NEDA (20.3% versus 11.5%; p = 0.047) compared with GA 20 mg/ml QD patients after 2 years of treatment. Matching-adjusted peginterferon beta-1a patients (effective n = 276) demonstrated a similar ARR at 1 year (0.278 versus 0.318; p = 0.375) and significantly lower ARR at 2 years (0.0901 versus 0.203; p = 0.032) and 3 years (0.109 versus 0.209; p = 0.047) compared with GA 40 mg/ml TIW patients (n = 834). CONCLUSION: Results from separate matching comparisons of phase III clinical trials and extension studies suggest that peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg Q2W may provide better clinical outcomes than GA (20 mg/ml QD or 40 mg/ml TIW).

Matching-adjusted comparisons demonstrate better clinical outcomes in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with teriflunomide.

BACKGROUND: Peginterferon beta-1a and teriflunomide are both first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS); however, no head-to-head trials have directly compared their clinical efficacy. We performed a matching-adjusted comparison of individual patient data from the peginterferon beta-1a pivotal phase 3 study, ADVANCE, and its extension study, ATTAIN, with pooled aggregated data from the teriflunomide pivotal phase 3 studies, TEMSO and TOWER. METHODS: A total of 512 patients randomized to subcutaneous (SC) peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks in ADVANCE and 731 patients randomized to teriflunomide 14 mg daily (359 from TEMSO and 372 from TOWER) were matched on key baseline characteristics. After matching, weighted annualized relapse rate (ARR) and 24-week confirmed disability worsening (CDW) were calculated and compared for peginterferon beta-1a- and teriflunomide-treated patients. A subset analysis comparing weighted ARR in patients who were newly diagnosed with RMS (diagnosis ≤1 year before study enrollment and disease-modifying therapy naïve) was also performed. RESULTS: After matching, the peginterferon beta-1a and teriflunomide treatment groups were identically matched across baseline characteristics. The proportion of patients in the overall study populations with 24-week CDW at 108 weeks was significantly lower in the peginterferon beta-1a group than the teriflunomide group both before matching (8.5% vs 12.6%; P = 0.0249) and after matching (8.4% vs 12.6%; P = 0.0323). ARR at 108 weeks was numerically lower with peginterferon beta-1a than with teriflunomide both before matching (0.278 vs 0.354; P = 0.1326) and after matching (0.257 vs 0.354; P = 0.0510). Newly diagnosed patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a had numerically lower ARR than patients treated with teriflunomide both at 108 weeks (before matching: 0.225 vs 0.270; P = 0.587; after matching: 0.201 vs 0.270; P = 0.384) and at 5 years (before matching: 0.150 vs 0.196; after matching: 0.142 vs 0.196). CONCLUSIONS: In this matching-adjusted comparison of patients with RMS from three phase 3 trials, a significantly lower proportion of patients treated with SC peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks than with oral teriflunomide 14 mg once daily had 24-week CDW at 108 weeks. In addition, in both the overall population and newly diagnosed patient subgroups, ARR at 108 weeks was numerically lower with peginterferon beta-1a than with teriflunomide. The numerically lower ARR in newly diagnosed patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a compared with those treated with teriflunomide was sustained through up to 5 years of treatment.

Relapse recovery: The forgotten variable in multiple sclerosis clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether basing the decision to initiate immediate vs delayed disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on extent of recovery after initial relapse affects long-term disability accumulation in a multiple sclerosis (MS) evidence-based setting. METHODS: We analyzed the double-blind, placebo-controlled interferon beta-1a 30 mc once a week in clinically isolated syndrome and 10-year-follow-up extension trial. Good recovery after presenting relapse was defined as (1) full early recovery within 28 days of symptom onset (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score of 0 at enrollment maintained ≥6 months) and (2) delayed good recovery (EDSS score > 0 at enrollment and improvement from peak deficit to 6th-month or 1-year visit ≥ median). Time from recovery assignment to future disability (EDSS score ≥ 2.5 or ≥4.0) was studied on a relapse-recovery-stratified age axis and immediate vs 3-year delayed treatment initiation with Kaplan-Meier statistics and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five/328 patients had good recovery (94 immediate and 81 delayed treatment); 153 did not have good recovery (77 immediate and 76 delayed treatment). HRs for EDSS score ≥2.5 outcome were: delayed treatment without good recovery as reference (HR = 1.0), delayed treatment with good recovery (HR6th-month: 0.67, p = 0.207; HR1st-year: 0.40, p = 0.027), immediate treatment without good recovery (HR6th-month: 0.56, p = 0.061; HR1st-year: 0.40, p = 0.011), and immediate treatment with good recovery (HR6th-month: 0.43, p = 0.014; HR1st-year: 0.48, p = 0.034). Placebo patients were switched to long-term treatment after 3 years, and insufficient EDSS score ≥4.0 outcome events were available to study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MS presenting without good recovery after the initial relapse, immediate DMT initiation favorably influences the likelihood of more ambulatory-benign disease akin to patients with good recovery after the initial relapse. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with MS without good recovery after the initial relapse, immediate DMT initiation increases the likelihood of a benign disease course.

Development of a gait module to complement the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) is a patient-reported outcome instrument that quantifies the progressive loss of walking ability from the patient perspective. However, previous psychometric analyses indicated floor and ceiling effects across the multiple sclerosis severity spectrum. This study aimed to address floor effects by creating a gait module that can be used in conjunction with the MSWS-12 for better measurement of treatment benefit in the higher functioning multiple sclerosis population. METHODS: We used a step-wise mixed methods study design, with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients (wave 1, n=88; wave 2, n=30), combining qualitative (concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews) and quantitative (Rasch Measurement Theory) data collection and analytical techniques and consultation interviews with three neurologists specializing in multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: Thirty-seven walking ability concepts were identified, and a five-domain conceptual framework was created. Draft items were generated and refined with patient and neurologist input. Draft items covered gait-related concepts such as dragging, shuffling, limping, tripping and falling. Rasch measurement theory psychometric analysis indicated administering MSWS-12 plus gait items improved measurement precision in targeted populations with better walking ability. CONCLUSION: Study findings indicate that new gait items could improve sensitivity to detect clinical change in walking ability for higher functioning multiple sclerosis patients.

Addressing the targeting range of the ABILHAND-56 in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A mixed methods psychometric study.

BACKGROUND: ABILHAND, a manual ability patient-reported outcome instrument originally developed for stroke patients, has been used in multiple sclerosis clinical trials; however, psychometric analyses indicated the measure's limited measurement range and precision in higher-functioning multiple sclerosis patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify candidate items to expand the measurement range of the ABILHAND-56, thus improving its ability to detect differences in manual ability in higher-functioning multiple sclerosis patients. METHODS: A step-wise mixed methods design strategy was used, comprising two waves of patient interviews, a combination of qualitative (concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing) and quantitative (Rasch measurement theory) analytic techniques, and consultation interviews with three clinical neurologists specializing in multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: Original ABILHAND was well understood in this context of use. Eighty-two new manual ability concepts were identified. Draft supplementary items were generated and refined with patient and neurologist input. Rasch measurement theory psychometric analysis indicated supplementary items improved targeting to higher-functioning multiple sclerosis patients and measurement precision. The final pool of Early Multiple Sclerosis Manual Ability items comprises 20 items. CONCLUSION: The synthesis of qualitative and quantitative methods used in this study improves the ABILHAND content validity to more effectively identify manual ability changes in early multiple sclerosis and potentially help determine treatment effect in higher-functioning patients in clinical trials.

Matching-adjusted comparisons demonstrate better clinical outcomes with SC peginterferon beta-1a every two weeks than with SC interferon beta-1a three times per week.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous (SC) peginterferon beta-1a and SC interferon beta-1a (IFN beta-1a) have demonstrated efficacy in treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) but have never been compared in direct head-to-head clinical trials, the gold-standard comparison. A well-balanced matching-adjusted comparison of weighted individual patient data on SC peginterferon beta-1a, and aggregate data from published phase 3 clinical trials of SC IFN beta-1a, was conducted to provide additional information on the comparative efficacy of these two agents. METHODS: Individual patient data from a study of SC peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every two weeks (ADVANCE) and pooled summary data from four published studies of SC IFN beta-1a 44 mcg three times per week (OPERA I and II, CARE-MS I and II) with similar populations were utilized. A comparison was conducted by weighting individual peginterferon beta-1a-treated patients, using estimated propensity of enrolling in SC IFN beta-1a treatment to match multiple key aggregate baseline characteristics of SC IFN beta-1a-treated patients. After matching, weighted annualized relapse rate (ARR), 24-week confirmed disability worsening (CDW), and clinical no evidence of disease activity (clinical-NEDA) were calculated and compared for peginterferon beta-1a and SC IFN beta-1a. RESULTS: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced across treatment groups. At 2 years, ARR after matching was 0.256 for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a (effective n = 376) and 0.335 for those receiving SC IFN beta-1a (n = 1218) (P = 0.0901). The percentage of patients who were relapse free over 2 years was significantly higher with peginterferon beta-1a than with SC IFN beta-1a (75.1% vs. 57.4% [after matching], P < 0.0001). The peginterferon beta-1a treatment group had a significantly lower proportion of patients with 24-week CDW compared with SC IFN beta-1a (after matching 6.5% vs. 13.2%; P = 0.0007). Clinical-NEDA occurred in a significantly higher proportion of patients treated with SC peginterferon beta-1a versus SC IFN beta-1a (74.1% vs. 48.1%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This matching-adjusted comparison using data from four phase 3 trials with SC IFN beta-1a formulations demonstrated that patients with RRMS treated with SC peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every two weeks achieved better clinical outcomes than patients who received SC IFN beta-1a 44 mcg three times per week.

Optimal Intereye Difference Thresholds in Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness for Predicting a Unilateral Optic Nerve Lesion in Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The optic nerve is a frequent site for involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) detects thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in eyes of patients with MS and in those meeting criteria for clinically or radiologically isolated demyelinating syndromes. Current international diagnostic criteria for MS do not include the optic nerve as an imaging lesion site despite the high prevalence of acute optic neuritis (ON), or occult optic neuropathy, among early MS and clinically isolated syndrome patients; as well as most MS patients over the course of the disease. We sought to determine optimal thresholds for intereye difference in peripapillary RNFL thickness that are most predictive of a unilateral optic nerve lesion. METHODS: We analyzed spectral domain OCT data of 31 healthy volunteers and 124 patients with MS at a single center as part of an ongoing collaborative investigation of visual outcomes. Intereye differences in peripapillary (360°) RNFL thickness were calculated as the absolute value of the difference. First, we determined the 95th percentile value of intereye difference for the healthy volunteers. This value was applied to the convenience sample group of MS patients as a validation cohort determining how well this threshold could distinguish patients with vs without a history of unilateral ON. The relation of intereye differences in peripapillary RNFL thickness to binocular low-contrast letter acuity scores was also examined. RESULTS: Among healthy volunteer participants (n = 31), the 95th percentile value for intereye difference (upper boundary of expected for normal controls) was 6.0 µm. This value was applied to the convenience sample group of MS patients (n = 124, validation cohort). Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying MS patients with a history of unilateral ON were calculated for the 6-µm threshold value in a 2 × 2 table analysis with the application of χ tests (P < 0.0001). The 6-µm threshold was predictive of worse binocular low-contrast acuity scores at 2.5% (P = 0.03) and 1.25% (P = 0.002 by linear regression analyses). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated an optimal intereye difference threshold of 5 µm for identifying unilateral ON in the MS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: An intereye difference of 5-6 µm in RNFL thickness is a robust structural threshold for identifying the presence of a unilateral optic nerve lesion in MS.

Peginterferon beta-1a reduces the evolution of MRI lesions to black holes in patients with RRMS: a post hoc analysis from the ADVANCE study.

The presence of chronic black holes, i.e., chronic lesions that are hypointense on T1-weighted images and are indicative of more severe tissue injury, has been increasingly utilized as a surrogate marker of therapeutic outcome in multiple sclerosis. The ADVANCE study was a 2-year, double-blind, pivotal trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg in 1512 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This report describes the correlation of clinical outcomes with the evolution of acute lesions into chronic black holes in ADVANCE, and the efficacy of peginterferon beta-1a in reducing this evolution. Treatment with peginterferon beta-1a significantly reduced the mean number of new/enlarging T2-weighted (NET2) lesions (0.76 vs. 1.03 from week 24, p = 0.0037; 0.44 vs. 0.99 from week 48, p < 0.0001) and new gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions (0.15 vs. 0.32 from week 24, p < 0.0001; 0.09 vs. 0.19 from week 48) that evolved into chronic black holes by 2 years. Patients with NET2 or Gd+ lesions at 24 weeks that evolved into chronic black holes showed significantly worse clinical outcomes, including a greater proportion with 12-week (14.9 vs. 8.4%; p = 0.0167) and 24-week (12.3 vs. 7.0%; p = 0.0333) confirmed disability worsening and higher mean annualized relapse rate (0.62 vs. 0.43; p = 0.0118), compared with patients with lesions that did not evolve into black holes. The correlation was independent of treatment. Reduced risk of evolution of new lesions into chronic black holes with peginterferon beta-1a treatment suggests potential to reduce long-term disability in RRMS by preventing irreversible tissue damage.

Clinical significance in the change of decline in ALSFRS-R.

Our objective was to survey ALS clinicians and researchers regarding what percentage reduction in the ALSFRS-R (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale - Revised) slope they would consider clinically meaningful. A nine-question survey was provided to 65 members of the Northeast ALS Consortium (NEALS). They were asked to rate the clinical relevance of 10-50% changes in decline of the ALSFRS-R slope on a seven-point scale (1-7), where 1='not at all clinically meaningful', 4='somewhat clinically meaningful', and 7='very clinically meaningful'. Ninety per cent of participants rated a 20% change in the decline of the ALSFRS-R score as the percentage in which a somewhat clinically significant change starts to be noted (i.e. score of 4 or higher). All participants endorsed a 25% or higher change in the ALSFRS-R score as at least somewhat clinically meaningful (score of 4 or higher). Ninety-three per cent of the participants viewed a 50% change in decline as very clinically meaningful (score of 7). This survey demonstrated that the majority of clinicians and clinical researchers surveyed believe that a therapy that resulted in a change of 20% or greater in the slope of the ALSFRS-R would be clinically meaningful.