RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Ethiopia has experienced rapid expansion of antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, as long-term retention in ART therapy is key for ART effectiveness, determinants of attrition need to be identified so appropriate interventions can be designed. METHODS: We used data from the 'Cohort of African people Starting Antiretroviral therapy' (CASA) project, a prospective study of a cohort of HIV-infected patients who started ART in seven health facilities (HFs). We analysed the data of patients who had started first-line ART between January 2013 and December 2014. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of retention at different time points. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with attrition. RESULTS: A total of 1198 patients were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier estimates of retention in care were 83.9%, 82.1% and 79.8% at 12, 18 and 24 months after starting ART, respectively. Attrition was mainly due to loss to follow-up, transferred-out patients and documented mortality. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed that male sex, CD4 count <200 cells/µL and the type of HF were significantly associated with attrition. CONCLUSIONS: The observed attrition differences according to gender suggest that separate interventions designed for women and men should be explored. Moreover, innovative strategies to increase HIV testing should be supported to avoid CD4 levels falling too low, a factor significantly associated with higher attrition in our study. Finally, specific studies to analyse the reasons for different levels of attrition among HFs are required.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines. METHODS: A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing. RESULTS: The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings. CONCLUSIONS: The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.
CONTEXTO: Diferenças de sexo e gênero são muitas vezes negligenciadas no desenho da pesquisa, na implementação do estudo e no relato científico, bem como na comunicação científica em geral. Este descuido limita a capacidade de generalização dos achados das pesquisas e a sua aplicabilidade à prática clínica, em particular para as mulheres, mas também para os homens. Este artigo descreve a fundamentação lógica para um conjunto internacional de diretrizes, com o intuito de encorajar uma abordagem mais sistemática para o relato de sexo e gênero na pesquisa entre disciplinas. MÉTODOS: Um painel de 13 peritos, representando nove países, desenvolveu as diretrizes por meio de uma série de teleconferências, apresentações em conferências e uma oficina de dois dias. Realizou-se uma pesquisa na internet com 716 editores de revistas, cientistas e outros membros da comunidade editorial internacional, bem como uma busca bibliográfica sobre políticas de gênero e sexo na publicação científica. RESULTADOS: As diretrizes sobre Equidade de Sexo e Gênero em Pesquisa (Sex and Gender Equity in Research - SAGER) são um procedimento abrangente para relatar informações sobre sexo e gênero no desenho do estudo, na análise de dados, nos resultados e na interpretação dos achados. CONCLUSÕES: As diretrizes da SAGER destinam-se principalmente a orientar os autores na preparação de seus manuscritos, mas também são úteis para os editores, como guardiões da ciência, para integrar a avaliação de sexo e gênero em todos os manuscritos como parte integrante do processo editorial.
