Utilización de la ventilación no invasiva en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda. Estudio multicéntrico en unidades de cuidados intensivos / Use of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Multicenter study in intensive care units

Objetivo. Estudiar el uso de la ventilación no invasiva (VNI) en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda, en las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) de España. Métodos. Se realizó una encuesta a 254 UCI. Al final de ésta se invitó a participar en un estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo, y proporcionar información detallada sobre pacientes ventilados. Resultados. Contestaron 123 UCI; 119 utilizaban la VNI, de manera muy variable. En la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC), la VNI fue de primera elección en el 89% de las unidades; en el edema agudo de pulmón (EAP), el 79%; en la insuficiencia respiratoria tras la extubación, el 53%; en la neumonía, el 53%, y en el síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo (SDRA), el 17%. Su utilización en la EPOC fue ocasional o nula en el 11% de las unidades, y en el EAP, en el 21%. 18 hospitales enviaron información de 432 pacientes ventilados, de los que 232 (54%) recibieron VNI como primera elección. La neumonía o el SDRA fueron factores independientes en relación con el fracaso de la VNI (odds ratio ajustada [ORa] = 5,71; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 1,83-17,8; p = 0,003). La admisión en una unidad que ventilara de forma no invasiva a más de 50 pacientes/año (ORa = 0,22; IC del 95%, 0,07-0,63; p = 0,005) y una mayor razón PaO2/FIO2 tras una hora de ventilación (ORa = 0,98 por punto; IC del 95%, 0,97-0,99; p < 0,001) fueron factores protectores. Conclusiones. La VNI es ampliamente utilizada en las UCI de España, pero es posible que siga estando infrautilizada en la EPOC y el EAP. El diagnóstico de neumonía o SDRA fue un factor independiente en relación con el fracaso. Ventilar a más de 50 pacientes/año y una mayor PaO2/FIO2 tras una hora fueron factores protectores(AU)

Objectives. Study the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in patients with acute respiratory failure in intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain. Methods. A questionnaire was sent to 254 ICUs, after which, they were invited to participate in a multicenter, retrospective study, providing detailed information on ventilated patients. Results. Answers were received from 123 hospitals. Of these, 119 used NIV, although its use varied greatly. NIV is the treatment of choice in 89% of the units for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in 79% for acute pulmonary edema (APE), in 53% for postextubation failure, in 53% for pneumonia 53%, and in 17% for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It was used occasionally in COPD in 11% of the units, and in 21% of the units for APE. Eighteen hospitals provided additional information on 432 ventilated patients, 232 (54%) of whom received NIV as first line therapy. Presence of pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was an independent predictive factor of NIV failure (ORa = 5.71; CI 95%, 1.83-17.8; p = 0.003). Admission in a unit with experience in NIV in > 50 patients/year (ORa = 0.22; CI 95%, 0.07-0.63; p = 0.005) and a higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio after one hour of ventilation (ORa = 0.98 per point; CI 95%, 0.97-0.99; p < 0.001) were protector factors. Conclusions. In Spain, NIV is widely used but it may continue to be underused in COPD and APE. The diagnosis of pneumonia or ARDS was an independent predictive risk factor. Admission in an ICU with NIV in more than 50 patients/year also have higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio after one hour of ventilation were predictive factors of success(AU)

[ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome during pregnancy: a case report and review of therapeutic options]. / Síndrome coronario agudo con elevación de ST durante el embarazo: descripción de un caso y revisión de las opciones terapéuticas.

ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome is a clinical condition that is rarely observed in pregnant women. However, its manifestation is a situation of high maternal-fetal risk. Pharmacotherapeutical management of these patients is difficult and requires individualized care by a multidisciplinary team since many of the standard treatments are included within the categories of teratogencity C or D of the Food and Drug Administration and experience with techniques such as coronary angioplasty with stent placement is scarce. The case of a 32-year woman who was 11 weeks pregnant and diagnosed of acute coronary syndrome with ST segment and its therapeutic approach are described. Furthermore, the information available on epidemiology, etiology and pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome with ST segment during pregnancy and the specific role of the currently available treatment options are reviewed.

What are we doing in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in Europe? An analysis of a survey.

This study has analysed the status of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in Europe in medical schools, cities in the WHO European Healthy Cities network, and hospitals in the WHO European Health Promoting Hospitals network. Three questionnaires tested by a pilot study were sent in 1996-1997: one to medical school deans, one to the WHO Health Promoting Hospitals Network coordinators and one to the focal points of the WHO Healthy Cities Network. The glossary of terms was taken from the Utstein style guidelines. The 392 medical schools returned 168 questionnaires (43%): 167 teach CPR, 165 basic CPR, 136 advanced CPR and 114 both. The 310 hospitals returned 224 questionnaires and 202 were analysed (65%); 154 train physicians, 184 nurses and 110 nursing students. The 509 cities returned 67 questionnaires (13%); 28 train police officers and 36 fire fighters. A total of 120 institutions train paramedics and 82 lay people. The training hours in basic and advanced CPR vary between medical schools and various professional groups trained in hospitals and cities. More time is devoted to training in advanced CPR than in basic CPR and more in theory than practical training. This survey can be an important incentive for European Organisations to identify priorities in their educational efforts.