Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0263227, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085363

RESUMO

Peripheral Venous Catheter (PVC) is a widely used device in the hospital setting and is often associated with significant adverse events that may impair treatment administration and patient health. The aim of the present study is to define the incremental benefits related to the implementation and the standardized and simultaneous use of three disposable devices for skin antisepsis, infusion, and cleaning, assuming the hospital's point of view, from an effectiveness, efficiency, and organizational perspective. For the achievement of the above objective, real-life data were collected by means of an observational prospective study, involving two hospitals in the Liguria Region (Northern Italy). Consecutive cases were enrolled and placed into two different scenarios: 1) use of all the three disposable devices, thus representing the scenario related to the implementation of a standardized optimal procedure (Scenario 1); 2) use of only one or two disposable devices, representing the scenario related to not being in a standardized optimal procedure (Scenario 2). For the definition of effectiveness indicators, the reason for PVC removal and the PVC-related adverse events occurrence were collected for each patient enrolled. In addition, an activity-based costing analysis grounded on a process-mapping technique was conducted to define the overall economic absorption sustained by hospitals when taking in charge patients requiring a PVC. Among the 380 patients enrolled in the study, 18% were treated with the standardized optimal procedure (Scenario 1). The two Scenarios differed in terms of number of patients for whom the PCV was removed due to the end of therapy (86.8% versus 39.40%, p-value = 0.000), with a consequent decrease in the adverse events occurrence rate. The economic evaluation demonstrated the sustainability and feasibility of implementing the standardized optimal procedure specifically related to the need for lower economic resources for the hospital management of adverse events occurred (€19.60 versus €21.71, p-value = 0.0019). An organizational advantage also emerged concerning an overall lower time to execute all the PVC-related activities (4.39 versus 5.72 minutes, p-value = 0.00). Results demonstrate the feasibility in the adoption of the standardized optimal procedure for PVC management, with significant advantages not only from a clinical point of view, but also from an organizational and economic perspective, thus being able to increase the overall operational efficiency of the hospitals.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/normas , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Periférico/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Evid Based Med ; 22(1): 1-3, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27986814

RESUMO

Evidence-based guidelines are considered an essential tool in assisting physicians, policymakers and patients when choosing among alternative care options and are considered unbiased standards of care. Unfortunately, depending on how their reliability is measured, up to 50% of guidelines can be considered untrustworthy. This carries serious consequences for patients' safety, resource use and health economics burden. Although conflict of interests, panel composition and methodological flaws are traditionally thought to be the main reasons undermining their untrustworthiness, corruption and waste of biomedical research also contribute. We discuss these issues in the hope for a wider awareness of the limits of guidelines.


Assuntos
Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Erros Médicos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas
3.
Ital Heart J Suppl ; 6(10): 674-81, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16273755

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Elderly subjects frequently experience a decline in function following hospitalization and surgery. Specific changes in the provision of acute hospital care can improve the ability of acutely ill older patients to perform activities of daily living at the time of discharge and the quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of older (age > or =80 years) cardiac surgery patients managed with multicomponent intervention. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2004, we studied records of 193 octogenarian patients who underwent cardiac surgery and were treated with a multicomponent intervention that included: specially designed environment, patient-centered care, planning for patient discharge at home, and an interdisciplinary approach that incorporates in- and out-of-hospital health professionals. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 26.4 months and 100% complete. Mean age of patients was 82.3 +/- 2 years. Eighty-nine patients had myocardial revascularization (CABG), 40 aortic valve replacement (AVR), 34 AVR + CABG, 8 mitral valve replacement (MVR), 11 MVR + CABG and 11 other interventions. Rates of hospital death, major complications and prolonged stay (> 14 days) were as follows: CABG 4 (4.4%), 3 (3.3%), 6 (6.4%); AVR 1 (2.5%), 3 (7.5%), 2 (5%); AVR + CABG 1 (2.9%), 2 (5.8%), 4 (11.7%); MVR 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 1 (12.5%); MVR + CABG 2 (18.1%), 2 (18.1%), 3 (27.2%). Multivariate predictors of hospital deaths were NYHA class, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping time, urgent procedure and ischemic mitral valve procedures. The actuarial 6-year survival was as follows: CABG 91%,AVR 92.5%, AVR + CABG 88.2%, MVR + CABG 81.8%. Total survival rate, free from rehospitalization and redo surgery, was 89.7, 69.8 and 99% respectively. Multivariate predictors of late death were urgent procedure and ischemic mitral valve procedures. At follow-up NYHA classification had improved a median of two classes. Global patients' satisfaction was excellent in 76.7% of survivors; 95.7% were autonomous, 40.5% live at home, 64% had a light-moderate physical activity, and 70% of patients had good social relationships and quality of life. Medical therapy was reduced in 29.3% and level of anxiety improved in 76%. CONCLUSIONS: An interdisciplinary approach and multicomponent intervention with an appropriate postoperative care, provides beneficial effects on outcome in geriatric cardiac surgery patients.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Seguimentos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Valva Mitral , Revascularização Miocárdica/mortalidade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...