Protocol-in-a-Day Workshop: Expediting IRB Approval for Junior and Senior Faculty.

Delays in research protocol development may be a single factor that hinders the career progression of academic faculty. Structured educational guidance during this phase proves crucial in mitigating setbacks in Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and expediting trial implementation. To address this, the Protocol-in-a-Day (PIAD) workshop, a comprehensive 1-day event involving members from six critical facets of RO clinical trial implementation, was established, offering significant input to individual protocols. Efficacy and satisfaction of the PIAD workshop were assessed through a 5-question survey and the average time from submission to IRB initial approval. The normality of the data was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk Test. Nonparametric data was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test for significance. A total of 18 protocols that went through the PIAD workshop were activated. The mean time to IRB approval for protocols that went through PIAD was 39.8 days compared to 58.4 days for those that did not go through the PIAD workshop. Based on survey results, 100% of PIAD participants said the PIAD workshop was useful and 94% of participants stated that the PIAD workshop improved the overall quality of their protocol. Participant surveys further highlighted substantial improvements in trial quality, language, and statistical design and revealed that all participants found the workshop helpful. Therefore, both junior and senior faculty benefitted from this educational program during protocol development, as both groups demonstrated shorter times to IRB approval than non-participants. This acceleration not only fosters efficient trial implementation but also supports academic faculty in their career development.

Definitive single fraction spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic sarcoma: Simultaneous integrated boost is associated with high tumor control and low vertebral fracture risk.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoma spinal metastases (SSM) are particularly difficult to manage given their poor response rates to chemotherapy and inherent radioresistance. We evaluated outcomes in a cohort of patients with SSM uniformly treated using single-fraction simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at a single tertiary institution treated with SSRS for SSM between April 2007-April 2023. 16-24 Gy was delivered to the GTV and 16 Gy uniformly to the CTV. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess time to progression of disease (PD) with proportionate hazards modelling used to determine hazard ratios (HR) and respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: 70 patients with 100 lesions underwent SSRS for SSM. Median follow-up was 19.3 months (IQR 7.7-27.8). Median age was 55 years (IQR42-63). Median GTV and CTVs were 14.5 cm3 (IQR 5-32) and 52.7 cm3 (IQR 29.5-87.5) respectively. Median GTV prescription dose and biologically equivalent dose (BED) [α/ß = 10] was 24 Gy and 81.6 Gy respectively. 85 lesions received 24 Gy to the GTV. 27 % of patients had Bilsky 1b or greater disease. 16 of 100 lesions recurred representing a crude local failure rate of 16 % with a median time to failure of 10.4 months (IQR 5.7-18) in cases which failed locally. 1-year actuarial local control (LC) was 89 %. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.3 months (IQR 7.7-25) from SSRS. Every 1 Gy increase in GTV absolute minimum dose (DMin) across the range (5.8-25 Gy) was associated with a reduced risk of local failure (HR = 0.871 [95 % CI 0.782-0.97], p = 0.009). 9 % of patients developed vertebral compression fractures at a median of 13 months post SSRS (IQR 7-25). CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the most homogenously treated and the largest cohorts of patients with SSM treated with single-fraction SSRS. Despite inherent radioresistance, SSRS confers durable and high rates of local control in SSM without unexpected long-term toxicity rates.

DrugMechDB: A Curated Database of Drug Mechanisms.

Computational drug repositioning methods have emerged as an attractive and effective solution to find new candidates for existing therapies, reducing the time and cost of drug development. Repositioning methods based on biomedical knowledge graphs typically offer useful supporting biological evidence. This evidence is based on reasoning chains or subgraphs that connect a drug to a disease prediction. However, there are no databases of drug mechanisms that can be used to train and evaluate such methods. Here, we introduce the Drug Mechanism Database (DrugMechDB), a manually curated database that describes drug mechanisms as paths through a knowledge graph. DrugMechDB integrates a diverse range of authoritative free-text resources to describe 4,583 drug indications with 32,249 relationships, representing 14 major biological scales. DrugMechDB can be employed as a benchmark dataset for assessing computational drug repositioning models or as a valuable resource for training such models.

DrugMechDB: A Curated Database of Drug Mechanisms.

Computational drug repositioning methods have emerged as an attractive and effective solution to find new candidates for existing therapies, reducing the time and cost of drug development. Repositioning methods based on biomedical knowledge graphs typically offer useful supporting biological evidence. This evidence is based on reasoning chains or subgraphs that connect a drug to disease predictions. However, there are no databases of drug mechanisms that can be used to train and evaluate such methods. Here, we introduce the Drug Mechanism Database (DrugMechDB), a manually curated database that describes drug mechanisms as paths through a knowledge graph. DrugMechDB integrates a diverse range of authoritative free-text resources to describe 4,583 drug indications with 32,249 relationships, representing 14 major biological scales. DrugMechDB can be employed as a benchmark dataset for assessing computational drug repurposing models or as a valuable resource for training such models.

Safety and Efficacy of Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases.

PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT) for spine metastases using a simultaneous integrated boost (SSIB) was shown as an alternative to the treatment of select osseous metastases that are not amenable to spine stereotactic radiosurgery. We sought to update our clinical experience using SSIB in patients for whom dose escalation was warranted but spine stereotactic radiosurgery was not feasible. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 58 patients with 63 spinal metastatic sites treated with SSIB between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The gross tumor volume and clinical target volume were prescribed 40 and 30 Gy in 10 fractions, respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 31 months. Of 79% of patients who reported pain before RT with SSIB, 82% reported an improvement following treatment. Patient-reported pain scores on a 10-point scale revealed a significant decrease in pain at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after SSIB (P < .0001). Additionally, there were limited toxicities; only 1 patient suffered grade 3 toxicity (pain) following RT. There were no reports of radiation-induced myelopathy at last follow-up, and 8 patients (13%) experienced a vertebral column fracture post-treatment. Local control was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%-98%) and 74% (95% CI, 59%-91%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall survival was 64% (95% CI, 53%-78%) and 45% (95% CI, 34%-61%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The median overall survival was 18 months (95% CI, 13-27 months). Multivariable analysis using patient, tumor, and dosimetric characteristics revealed that a higher Karnofsky performance status before RT (hazard ratio, 0.44, 0.22-0.89; P = .02) was associated with longer survival. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate excellent pain relief and local control with limited acute toxicities following treatment with RT using SSIB to 40 Gy. Collectively, our data suggest that dose escalation to spine metastases using SSIB can be safe and efficacious for patients, especially those with radioresistant disease. Further investigation is warranted to validate these findings.