Mexican Registry of Cardiomyopathies: baseline data, diagnostic strategies, and treatment approaches in Mexico.

Objectives: The study aimed to know the clinical, demographic, diagnostic, and treatments characteristics in patients with cardiomyopathies in Mexico. Methods: The Mexican Registry of Cardiomyopathies (REMEMI) is an observational, prospective and national study of patients with cardiomyopathies, which includes: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy of the right ventricle (ARVC). Results: A total of 1026 patients from most states of the Mexican Republic (19) were included, with 494 corresponding to DCM, 490 to HCM, 35 to RCM, and seven to ARVC. We found significant differences between the various cardiomyopathy phenotypes (p < 0.05) in the coexistence with diabetes, use of implantable defibrillator, presence of ventricular tachycardia, and NYHA functional class ≥ 1. There were no significant differences in age and predominant gender between each one. When analyzing by phenotype, we found that patients with HCM have limited use of diagnostic methods considered indispensable, such as cardiac magnetic resonance, Holter monitoring, and genetic testing in patients and their relatives. Conclusion: Seeking contemporary information through observational registries in Mexico is a valuable opportunity to understand the characteristics of the methods used in the study and treatment of diseases such as cardiomyopathies by Mexican physicians. It can provide information for the implementation of management guidelines and strategies to disseminate findings to improve healthcare in our country.

Objetivo: Conocer las características clínicas y demográficas, así como las herramientas diagnósticas y tratamientos utilizados en pacientes con miocardiopatías en México. Métodos: El Registro Mexicano de Miocardiopatías (REMEMI) es un estudio observacional, prospectivo y nacional de pacientes con diagnóstico de miocardiopatía, que incluye: miocardiopatía dilatada (MCD), miocardiopatía hipertrófica (MCH), miocardiopatía restrictiva (MCR) y miocardiopatía arritmogénica del ventrículo derecho (MAVD). Resultados: Se incluyó un total de 1026 pacientes provenientes de la mayoría de los estados de la República Mexicana (19), de los cuales 494 corresponden a MCD, 490 a MCH, 35 a MCR y 7 a MAVD. Encontramos diferencias significativas entre los diversos fenotipos de miocardiopatías (p < 0.05) en la coexistencia con diabetes, empleo de desfibrilador implantable, presencia de taquicardia ventricular y la clase funcional de la NYHA ≥ 1. No hubo diferencias significativas en la edad y sexo predominante entre cada uno. Al analizar por fenotipo encontramos que la MCH tienen poco empleo de métodos diagnósticos considerados como indispensables como la resonancia magnética cardiaca, el monitoreo Holter y el estudio genético en los pacientes y sus familiares. Conclusión: La búsqueda de información contemporánea a través de registros observacionales en México es una buena oportunidad para conocer las características de los métodos empleados en el estudio y tratamiento de enfermedades como las miocardiopatías por médicos mexicanos, y puede ofrecernos información para la implementación de guías de manejo y estrategias de difusión de los hallazgos para así mejorar el cuidado de la salud en nuestro país.

Expert-approved best practice recommendations on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care (SedPall).

BACKGROUND: The use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in end-of-life care is associated with clinical, ethical and legal challenges. In view of these and of the issue's great importance to patients undergoing intolerable suffering, we conducted a project titled SedPall ("From anxiolysis to deep continuous sedation - Development of recommendations for sedation in palliative care") with the purpose of developing best practice recommendations on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care and obtaining feedback and approval from experts in this area. DESIGN: Our stepwise approach entailed drafting the recommendations, obtaining expert feedback, conducting a single-round Delphi study, and convening a consensus conference. As an interdisciplinary group, we created a set of best practice recommendations based on previously published guidance and empirical and normative analysis, and drawing on feedback from experts, including patient representatives and of public involvement participants. We set the required agreement rate for approval at the single-round Delphi and the consensus conference at ≥80%. RESULTS: Ten experts commented on the recommendations' first draft. The Delphi panel comprised 50 experts and patient and public involvement participants, while 46 participants attended the consensus conference. In total, the participants in these stages of the process approved 66 recommendations, covering the topics "indications", "intent/purpose [of sedation]", "decision-making", "information and consent", "medication and type of sedation", "monitoring", "management of fluids and nutrition", "continuing other measures", "support for relatives", and "team support". The recommendations include suggestions on terminology and comments on legal issues. CONCLUSION: Further research will be required for evaluating the feasibility of the recommendations' implementation and their effectiveness. The recommendations and the suggested terminology may serve as a resource for healthcare professionals in Germany on the use of sedative drugs and intentional sedation in specialist palliative care and may contribute to discussion on the topic at an international level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00015047 (German Clinical Trials Register).

A case report, bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax as a late complication for SARS CoV-2 infection.

The beta-coronavirus discovered in Wuhan in 2019 (COVID-19) provokes a series of affections from mild symptoms to life-threatening complications. There is evidence that associates the disease to spontaneous pneumothorax, however, the mechanism is unknown. The patient was a 45-year-old male with previous pneumonia due to COVID-19 who was attended the emergency department, where chest radiography was taken, confirming the diagnosis of right pneumothorax. However, the patient developed a new episode of pleuritic pain three days later, and a new radiograph showed left pneumothorax requiring a new chest tube. The simple tomography shows intraparenchymal bullae in the apical region of both lungs. The patient was kept under observation, and when improving, both endopleural chest drains were removed, and the patient was discharged. Spontaneous bilateral pneumothorax is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication. Identifying pulmonary bullae in patients with COVID-19 could be an early sign for these patients to develop spontaneous pneumothorax.

Effects of antimicrobial prophylaxis and blood stream infections in patients with acute liver failure: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated whether antimicrobial prophylaxis alters the incidence of bloodstream infection in patients with acute liver failure (ALF), and whether bloodstream infections affect overall mortality within 21 days after development of ALF. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 1551 patients with ALF enrolled by the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group from January 1998 through November 2009. We analyzed data on infections in the first 7 days after admission and the effects of prophylaxis with antimicrobial drugs on the development of bloodstream infections and 21-day mortality. RESULTS: In our study population, 600 patients (39%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis and 226 patients (14.6%) developed at least 1 bloodstream infection. Exposure to antimicrobial drugs did not affect the proportion of patients who developed bloodstream infections (12.8% in patients with prophylaxis vs 15.7% in nonprophylaxed patients; P = .12), but a greater percentage of patients who received prophylaxis received liver transplants (28% vs 22%; P = .01). After adjusting for confounding factors, overall mortality within 21 days was associated independently with age (odds ratio [OR], 1.014), Model for End-stage Liver Disease score at admission (OR, 1.078), and vasopressor administration at admission (OR, 2.499). Low grade of coma (OR, 0.47) and liver transplantation (OR, 0.101) reduced mortality. Although bloodstream infection was associated significantly with 21-day mortality (P = .004), an interaction between bloodstream infection and etiology was detected: blood stream infection affected mortality to a greater extent in nonacetaminophen ALF patients (OR, 2.03) than in acetaminophen ALF patients (OR, 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a large, observational study, antimicrobial prophylaxis does not reduce the incidence of bloodstream infection or mortality within 21 days of ALF. However, bloodstream infections were associated with increased 21-day mortality in patients with ALF-to a greater extent in patients without than with acetaminophen-associated ALF. Our findings do not support the routine use of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with ALF.